0
Journal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics | Volume 2 | Issue 2 | Research Paper
RESEARCH PAPERS

Study of Viscoplasticity Models for the Impact Behavior of High-Strength Steels

[+] Author and Article Information
N. Peixinho

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minho, Campus de Azurém, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugalpeixinho@dem.uminho.pt

A. Pinho

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minho, Campus de Azurém, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal

J. Comput. Nonlinear Dynam 2(2), 114-123 (Nov 17, 2006) (10 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2447129 History: Received April 03, 2006; Revised November 17, 2006
Article
References
Figures
Tables
Citing Articles

This study reports on modeling the mechanical behavior of high-strength steels subjected to impact loading. The materials studied were steel grades of interest for crashworthiness applications: dual-phase and transformation induced plasticity (TRIP) steels. The challenges associated with the numerical simulation of impact events involving these materials include the modeling of extensive plastic deformation, particularly the change of material properties with strain rate. Tensile testing was performed at different strain rates on the materials studied. The test results were used to compare and validate constitutive equations that provide a mathematical description of strain-rate dependence of the material properties. The Cowper–Symonds equation and modified variants were examined. The crashworthiness performance of thin-walled sections made of dual-phase and TRIP steels was also investigated. Axial crushing tests were performed at different speeds on top-hat and hexagonal tubes. The experimental results were compared with numerical simulations obtained using an explicit finite element program (LS-DYNA) and the original and modified Cowper–Symonds equations.
Copyright © 2007 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
+Results of Eq. 7 for TRIP600 ; (0) Rp0.2 proof stress; (◇) intermediate stress; UTS reference interval: 0.0001–209.8∕s; Du=160,171.4∕s; Dy=11,410.6∕s; pu=3.54; py=3.28
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Results of Eq. 7 for TRIP600 ; (0) Rp0.2 proof stress; (◇) intermediate stress; UTS reference interval: 0.0001–209.8∕s; Du=160,171.4∕s; Dy=11,410.6∕s; pu=3.54; py=3.28
Figure 5

Results of Eq. 7 for TRIP600 ; (0) Rp0.2 proof stress; (◇) intermediate stress; UTS reference interval: 0.0001–209.8∕s; Du=160,171.4∕s; Dy=11,410.6∕s; pu=3.54; py=3.28

Grahic Jump Location
+Detail of trigger and laser weld
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Detail of trigger and laser weld
Figure 6

Detail of trigger and laser weld

Grahic Jump Location
+Nominal dimensions of sections: (a) top-hat; and (b) hexagonal
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Nominal dimensions of sections: (a) top-hat; and (b) hexagonal
Figure 7

Nominal dimensions of sections: (a) top-hat; and (b) hexagonal

Grahic Jump Location
+Finite-element model of top-hat tube
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Finite-element model of top-hat tube
Figure 8

Finite-element model of top-hat tube

Grahic Jump Location
+Experimental and numerical load-time histories, DP600, test dt4
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Experimental and numerical load-time histories, DP600, test dt4
Figure 9

Experimental and numerical load-time histories, DP600, test dt4

Grahic Jump Location
+Experimental and numerical load-time histories, DP600, test dt2
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Experimental and numerical load-time histories, DP600, test dt2
Figure 10

Experimental and numerical load-time histories, DP600, test dt2

Grahic Jump Location
+Experimental and numerical load-time histories, TRIP600, test dt5
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Experimental and numerical load-time histories, TRIP600, test dt5
Figure 11

Experimental and numerical load-time histories, TRIP600, test dt5

Grahic Jump Location
+Experimental and numerical load-time histories, TRIP600, test dt7
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Experimental and numerical load-time histories, TRIP600, test dt7
Figure 12

Experimental and numerical load-time histories, TRIP600, test dt7

Grahic Jump Location
+Final deformed shapes obtained experimentally and numerically for DP600: (a) dt4, dp1; and (b) dt2, dp6
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Final deformed shapes obtained experimentally and numerically for DP600: (a) dt4, dp1; and (b) dt2, dp6
Figure 13

Final deformed shapes obtained experimentally and numerically for DP600: (a) dt4, dp1; and (b) dt2, dp6

Grahic Jump Location
+Final deformed shapes obtained experimentally and numerically for TRIP600: (a) dt5, trip2; and (b) dt7, trip6
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Final deformed shapes obtained experimentally and numerically for TRIP600: (a) dt5, trip2; and (b) dt7, trip6
Figure 14

Final deformed shapes obtained experimentally and numerically for TRIP600: (a) dt5, trip2; and (b) dt7, trip6

Grahic Jump Location
+Experimentally obtained variation of velocity of mass after striking specimen (velocities are determined from high speed film): (•–•): experimental data; (– – –) best curve fit (19)
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Experimentally obtained variation of velocity of mass after striking specimen (velocities are determined from high speed film): (•–•): experimental data; (– – –) best curve fit (19)
Figure 15

Experimentally obtained variation of velocity of mass after striking specimen (velocities are determined from high speed film): (•–•): experimental data; (– – –) best curve fit (19)

Grahic Jump Location
+Comparison of velocity–time histories of the different numerical simulations of Otubushin’s benchmark using Cowper–Symonds equation and modified version
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Comparison of velocity–time histories of the different numerical simulations of Otubushin’s benchmark using Cowper–Symonds equation and modified version
Figure 16

Comparison of velocity–time histories of the different numerical simulations of Otubushin’s benchmark using Cowper–Symonds equation and modified version

Grahic Jump Location
+Variation of strength properties with strain rate: (a) DP600; and (b) TRIP600
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Variation of strength properties with strain rate: (a) DP600; and (b) TRIP600
Figure 1

Variation of strength properties with strain rate: (a) DP600; and (b) TRIP600

Grahic Jump Location
+Results of Cowper–Symonds equation for DP600 steel: (0) Rp0.2 proof stress; (◇): intermediate stress; UTS: (a) reference: UTS; range: 0.0001–141∕s; D=64,601.9∕s; p=3.22; and (b) reference: Rp0.2; range: 0.0001–141∕s; D=1587.6∕s; p=2.33
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Results of Cowper–Symonds equation for DP600 steel: (0) Rp0.2 proof stress; (◇): intermediate stress; UTS: (a) reference: UTS; range: 0.0001–141∕s; D=64,601.9∕s; p=3.22; and (b) reference: Rp0.2; range: 0.0001–141∕s; D=1587.6∕s; p=2.33
Figure 2

Results of Cowper–Symonds equation for DP600 steel: (0) Rp0.2 proof stress; (◇): intermediate stress; UTS: (a) reference: UTS; range: 0.0001–141∕s; D=64,601.9∕s; p=3.22; and (b) reference: Rp0.2; range: 0.0001–141∕s; D=1587.6∕s; p=2.33

Grahic Jump Location
+Results of Cowper–Symonds equation for TRIP600 ; (0) Rp0.2 proof stress; (◇) intermediate stress; UTS: (a) UTS; 0.0001–209.8∕s; D=160,171.4∕s: p=3.54; and (b)Rp0.2; 0.0001–209.8∕s; D=11,410.6∕s; p=3.28
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Results of Cowper–Symonds equation for TRIP600 ; (0) Rp0.2 proof stress; (◇) intermediate stress; UTS: (a) UTS; 0.0001–209.8∕s; D=160,171.4∕s: p=3.54; and (b)Rp0.2; 0.0001–209.8∕s; D=11,410.6∕s; p=3.28
Figure 3

Results of Cowper–Symonds equation for TRIP600 ; (0) Rp0.2 proof stress; (◇) intermediate stress; UTS: (a) UTS; 0.0001–209.8∕s; D=160,171.4∕s: p=3.54; and (b)Rp0.2; 0.0001–209.8∕s; D=11,410.6∕s; p=3.28

Grahic Jump Location
+Results of Eq. 7 for DP600 ; (0) Rp0.2 proof stress; (◇) intermediate stress; UTS reference interval: 0.0001–141∕s; Du=64,601.9∕s; Dy=1587.6∕s; pu=3.22; py=2.33
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Results of Eq. 7 for DP600 ; (0) Rp0.2 proof stress; (◇) intermediate stress; UTS reference interval: 0.0001–141∕s; Du=64,601.9∕s; Dy=1587.6∕s; pu=3.22; py=2.33
Figure 4

Results of Eq. 7 for DP600 ; (0) Rp0.2 proof stress; (◇) intermediate stress; UTS reference interval: 0.0001–141∕s; Du=64,601.9∕s; Dy=1587.6∕s; pu=3.22; py=2.33

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Materials
Power Boilers> Chapter 3
Axially Loaded Members
Design & Analysis of ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Components in the Creep Range> Chapter 2
Members in Bending
Design & Analysis of ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Components in the Creep Range> Chapter 3
Introduction and Definitions
Handbook on Stiffness & Damping in Mechanical Design> Chapter 1
Section III: Subsections NC and ND — Class 2 and 3 Components
Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Volume 1, Fourth Edition> Chapter 7
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In