Research Papers

Parameters Identification for Nonlinear Dynamic Systems Via Genetic Algorithm Optimization

[+] Author and Article Information
A. C. Gondhalekar, E. P. Petrov, M. Imregun

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, UK

J. Comput. Nonlinear Dynam 4(4), 041002 (Aug 24, 2009) (9 pages) doi:10.1115/1.3187213 History: Received December 05, 2007; Revised November 24, 2008; Published August 24, 2009

This paper presents a frequency domain method for the location, characterization, and identification of localized nonlinearities in mechanical systems. The nonlinearities are determined by recovering nonlinear restoring forces, computed at each degree-of-freedom (DOF). Nonzero values of the nonlinear force indicate nonlinearity at the corresponding DOFs and the variation in the nonlinear force with frequency (force footprint) characterizes the type of nonlinearity. A library of nonlinear force footprints is obtained for various types of individual and combined nonlinearities. Once the location and the type of nonlinearity are determined, a genetic algorithm based optimization is used to extract the actual values of the nonlinear parameters. The method developed allows simultaneous identification of one or more types of nonlinearity at any given DOF. Parametric identification is possible even if the type of nonlinearity is not known in advance, a very useful feature when the type characterization is difficult. The proposed method is tested on simulated response data. Different combinations of localized cubic stiffness nonlinearity, clearance nonlinearity, and frictional nonlinearity are considered to explore the method’s capabilities. Finally, the response data are polluted with random noise to examine the performance of the method in the presence of measurement noise.

Copyright © 2009 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Footprint library for various nonlinearity types

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Comparison of cubic stiffness and clearance away from the resonance

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Flowchart for the genetic algorithm

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Representative 2DOF system

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Response with cubic stiffness (a) and clearance (b) nonlinearity

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Nonlinear force variation for cubic stiffness nonlinearity

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Effect of binary multipliers on the performance of GAs

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Response with 7.5% noise (cubic stiffness nonlinearity)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Error in parameter estimation-cubic stiffness nonlinearity

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Error in parameter estimation (cubic stiffness+clearance)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

Selection of points for the three cases

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 12

Nonlinear beam with cubic stiffness nonlinearity

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 13

Comparison of linear and nonlinear response

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 14

Comparison of nonlinear force for case B




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In