0
Research Papers

Error-Controlled Model Reduction in Flexible Multibody Dynamics

[+] Author and Article Information
Jörg Fehr

Institute of Engineering and Computational Mechanics, University of Stuttgart, Pfaffenwaldring 9, 70569 Stuttgart, Germanyfehr@itm.uni-stuttgart.de

Peter Eberhard

Institute of Engineering and Computational Mechanics, University of Stuttgart, Pfaffenwaldring 9, 70569 Stuttgart, Germanyeberhard@itm.uni-stuttgart.de

J. Comput. Nonlinear Dynam 5(3), 031005 (May 14, 2010) (8 pages) doi:10.1115/1.4001372 History: Received January 15, 2009; Revised May 12, 2009; Published May 14, 2010; Online May 14, 2010

One important issue for the simulation of flexible multibody systems is the quality controlled reduction in the flexible bodies degrees of freedom. In this work, the procedure is based on knowledge about the error induced by model reduction. For modal reduction, no error bound is available. For Gramian matrix based reduction methods, analytical error bounds can be developed. However, due to numerical reasons, the dominant eigenvectors of the Gramian matrix have to be approximated. Within this paper, two different methods are presented for this purpose. For moment matching methods, the development of a priori error bounds is still an active field of research. In this paper, an error estimator based on a new second order adaptive global Arnoldi algorithm is introduced and further assists the user in the reduction process. We evaluate and compare those methods by reducing the flexible degrees of freedom of a rack used for active vibration damping of a scanning tunneling microscope.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2010 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Topics: Errors
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Preprocessing for the simulation of a flexible multibody system

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Distribution of expansion points

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Model of the rack

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Relative reduction error using different approaches

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Error indicator used for the reduction process

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Relative reduction error using different approaches

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Relative reduction error using different frequency intervals

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In