Research Papers

Nonlinear Dynamic Probabilistic Analysis for Turbine Casing Radial Deformation Using Extremum Response Surface Method Based on Support Vector Machine

[+] Author and Article Information
Chengwei Fei

e-mail: feicw544@163.com

Guangchen Bai

e-mail: dlxbgc@buaa.edu.cn
School of Jet Propulsion,
Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,
Beijing, 100191, China

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Design Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the Journal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics. Manuscript received May 18, 2012; final manuscript received February 3, 2013; published online March 26, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Jozsef Kovecses.

J. Comput. Nonlinear Dynam 8(4), 041004 (Mar 26, 2013) (8 pages) Paper No: CND-12-1075; doi: 10.1115/1.4023589 History: Received May 18, 2012; Revised February 03, 2013

To improve the computational efficiency of nonlinear dynamic probabilistic analysis for aeroengine typical components, an extremum response surface method based on the support vector machine (SVM ERSM) was proposed in this paper. The basic principle was introduced and the mathematical model was established for the SVM ERSM. The probabilistic analysis of turbine casing radial deformation was taken as an example to validate the SVM ERSM considering the influences of nonlinear material property and dynamic heat loads. The results of probabilistic analysis imply that the distribution features of random parameters and the major factors are gained for more accurate the design of casing radial deformation. The SVM ERSM offers a feasible and valid method, which possesses high efficiency and high precision in the nonlinear dynamic probabilistic analysis. Moreover, the SVM ERSM is promising to provide an useful insight for casing dynamic optimal design and the blade-tip clearance control of aeroengine high pressure turbine.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Lattime, S. B., and Steinetz, B. M., 2004, “High Pressure Turbine Clearance Control System: Current Practices and Future Directions,” J. Propul. Power, 20(2), pp. 302–311. [CrossRef]
Annette, E. N., Christoph, W. M., and Stephan, S., 2005, “Modeling and Validation of the Thermal Effects on Gas Turbine Transients,” J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 127(3), pp. 564–572. [CrossRef]
Kypuros, J. A., and Melcher, K. J., 2003, “A Reduced Model for Prediction of Thermal and Rotational Effects on Turbine Tip Clearance,” NASA/TM-2003-212226, March; see also URL http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20030032933%5F2003026900.pdf
Gurvich, M. R., and Pipes, R. B., 1996, “Probabilistic Strength Analysis of Four-Directional Laminated Composites,” Compos. Sci. Technol., 56(6), pp. 649–656. [CrossRef]
Fitzpatrick, C. K., Baldwin, M. A., Rullkoetter, P. J., Laz, P. J., 2011, “Combined Probabilistic and Principal Component Analysis Approach for Multivariate Sensitivity Evaluation and Application to Implanted Patellofemoral Mechanics,” J. Biomech., 44(1), pp. 13–21. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Alessandro, Z., Michele, B., Andrea, D. A., Luigino, D., 2010, “Probabilistic Analysis for Design Assessment of Continuous Steel-Concrete Composite Girders,” J. Construct. Steel Res., 66(7), pp. 897–905. [CrossRef]
Pietrzyk, K., and Hagentoft, C., 2008, “Probabilistic Analysis of Air Infiltration in Low-Rise Buildings,” Building and Environment, 43(4), pp. 537–549. [CrossRef]
Nakamura, T., and Fujii, K., 2006, “Probabilistic Transient Thermal Analysis of an Atmospheric Reentry Vehicle Structure,” Aerospace Sci. Technol., 10(4), pp. 346–354. [CrossRef]
Hu, D. Y., Wang, R. Q., and Tao, Z., 2011, “Probabilistic Design for Turbine Disk at High Temperature,” Aircraft Eng. Aerospace Technol., 83(4), pp. 199–207. [CrossRef]
Murat, E. K., Hasan, B. B., and Alemdar, B., 2011, “Probabilistic Nonlinear Analysis of CFR Dams by MCS Using Response Surface Method,” Appl. Math. Model., 35(6), pp. 2752–2770. [CrossRef]
Lü, Q., and Low, B. K., 2011, “Probabilistic Analysis of Underground Rock Excavations Using Response Surface Method and SORM,” Comput. Geotech., 38(8), pp. 1008–1021. [CrossRef]
Mollon, G., Dias, D., and Soubra, A. H., 2011, “Probabilistic Analysis of Pressurized Tunnels Against Face Stability Using Collocation Based Stochastic Response Surface Method,” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 137(4), pp. 385–397. [CrossRef]
Bucher, C. G., and Bourgund, U., 1990, “A Fast and Efficient Response Surface Approach for Structural Reliability Problems,” Struct. Safety, 7(1), pp. 57–66. [CrossRef]
Rajashekhar, M. R., and Ellingwood, B. R., 1993, “A New Look at the Response Surface Approach for Reliability Analysis,” Struct. Safety, 12(3), pp. 205–220. [CrossRef]
Kim, S., and Na, S., 1997, “Response Surface Method Using Vector Projected Sampling Points,” Struct. Safety, 19(1), pp. 3–19. [CrossRef]
Guan, X. L., and Melchers, R. E., 2001, “Effect of Response Surface Parameter Variation on Structural Reliability Estimates,” Struct. Safety, 23(4), pp. 429–444. [CrossRef]
Li, H. S., and Lu, Z. Z., 2007, “Support Vector Regression for Structural Reliability Analysis,” Acta Aeronaut. Astronaut. Sin., 28(1), pp. 94–99. Available at http://hkxb.buaa.edu.cn/EN/abstract/abstract9032.shtml
Tan, X. H., Bi, W. H., Hou, X. L., Wei, W., 2011, “Reliability Analysis Using Radial Basis Function Networks and Support Vector Machines,” Comput. Geotech., 38(2), pp. 178–186. [CrossRef]
Guo, Z. W., and Bai, G. C., 2009, “Application of Least Squares Support Vector Machine for Regression to Reliability Analysis,” Chin. J. Aeronaut., 22(2), pp. 160–166. [CrossRef]
Moura, M. C., Zio, E., Lins, L. D., Droguett, E., 2011, “Failure and Reliability Prediction by Support Vector Machines Regression of Time Series Data,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safety, 96(11), pp. 1527 –1534. [CrossRef]
Rocco, C. M., and Moreno, J. A., 2002, “Fast Monte Carlo Reliability Evaluation Using Support Vector Machine,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safety, 76(3), pp. 237–243. [CrossRef]
Zhao, H. B., 2008, “Slope Reliability Analysis Using a Support Vector Machine,” Comput. Geotech., 36(3), pp. 459–467. [CrossRef]
Richard, B., Cremona, C., and Adelaide, L., 2012, “A Response Surface Method Based on Support Vector Machines Trained With an Adaptive Experimental Design,” Struct. Safety, 39(11), pp. 14–21. [CrossRef]
Basudhar, A., and Missoum, S., 2008, “Adaptive Explicit Decision Functions for Probabilistic Design and Optimization Using Support Vector Machines,” Comput. Struct., 86(19–20), pp. 1904–1917. [CrossRef]
Zhang, C. Y., and Bai, G. C., 2012, “Extremum Response Surface Method of Reliability Analysis on Two-Link Flexible Robot Manipulator,” Journal of Center South University, 19(1), pp. 101–107. [CrossRef]
Li, C., and Han, X., 2011, “Analysis of Reliability Sensitivity for Gear Engagement Based on Response Surface Method,” J. Aerospace Power, 26(3), pp. 711–715.
Ma, M., and Lu, Z. Z., 2007, “Structural System Reliability and Sensitivity Analysis Based on Support Vector Machine Regression,” Acta Mech. Solida Sin., 28(4), pp. 415–419. Available at http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-GTLX200704015.htm
Ersoy, H., and Mugan, A., 2002, “Design Sensitivity Analysis of Structures Based Upon the Singular Value Decomposition,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 191(32), pp. 3459–3476. [CrossRef]
Bertina, H. M. Q., and Dayawansa, W. P., 1998, “Non-Smooth Simultaneous Stabilization of Nonlinear Systems: An Interpolation Method,” Syst. Control Lett., 34(1–2), pp. 43–53. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

ERSM idea for structural dynamic PA

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Basic principle of SVM ERSM

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Structure and FEM of turbine casing

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Load spectrums from aeroengine

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Sampling history of extremum output response Y

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Variation of casing radial deformation Y

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Casing radial deformations distribution at t = 180 s

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Simulation results of casing radial deformation Y

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Probabilistic distributions of partial random variables

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Sensitivity analysis results of random variables




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In