Research Papers

Nonlinear Bifurcation Analysis of a Single-DoF Model of a Robotic Arm Subject to Digital Position Control

[+] Author and Article Information
Giuseppe Habib

e-mail: giuseppe.habib@uniroma1.it

Giuseppe Rega

e-mail: giuseppe.rega@uniroma1.it
Dipartimento di Ingegneria,
Strutturale e Geotecnica,
Sapienza University of Rome,
Rome, Italy

Gabor Stepan

Department or Applied Mechanics,
Budapest University of Technology and Economics,
H-1521, Budapest, Hungary
e-mail: stepan@mm.bme.hu

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Design Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND NONLINEAR DYNAMICS. Manuscript received November 7, 2011; final manuscript received March 6, 2012; published online June 14, 2012. Assoc. Editor: Claude-Henri Lamarque.

J. Comput. Nonlinear Dynam 8(1), 011009 (Jun 14, 2012) (9 pages) Paper No: CND-11-1209; doi: 10.1115/1.4006430 History: Received November 07, 2011; Revised March 06, 2012

Precision and stability in position control of robots are critical parameters in many industrial applications where high accuracy is needed. It is well known that digital effect is destabilizing and can cause instabilities. In this paper, we analyze a single DoF model of a robotic arm and we present the stability limits in the parameter space of the control gains. Furthermore we introduce a nonlinearity relative to the saturation of the control force in the model, reduce the dynamics of the nonlinear map to its local center manifold, study the bifurcation along the stability border and identify conditions under which a supercritical or subcritical bifurcation occurs. The obtained results explain some of the typical instabilities occurring in industrial applications. We verify the obtained results through numerical simulations.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Gorinevsky, D. M., Formalsky, A. M., and Schneider, A. Y., 1997, Force Control of Robotics Systems, CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, FL.
Siciliano, B., and Villani, L., 1999, Robot Force Control, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Natale, C., 2003, Interaction Control of Robot Manipulators, Springer, New York.
Colgate, E., and Schenkel, G. G., 1997, “Passivity of a Class of Sampled-Data Systems: Application to Haptic Interfaces,” J. Rob. Syst.14(1), pp. 37–47.
Gil, J. J., Avello, A., Rubio, A., and Florez, J., 2004, “Stability Analysis of a 1 DOF Haptic Interface Using the Routh-Hurwitz Criterion,” IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol.12, pp. 583–588. [CrossRef]
Kovacs, L. L., Kovecses, J., and Stepan, G., 2008, “Analysis of Effects of Differential Gain on Dynamic Stability of Digital Force Control,” Int. J. Nonlinear Mech.43, pp. 514–520. [CrossRef]
Stepan, G., 2001, “Vibrations of Machines Subjected to Digital Force Control,” Int. J. Solids Struct., 38, pp. 2149–2159. [CrossRef]
Hamzi, B., Barbot, J. P., Monaco, S., and Normand-Cyrot, D., 2001, “Nonlinear Discrete-Time Control of Systems with a Naimark-Sacker Bifurcation,” Syst. Control Lett., 44(4), pp. 245–258. [CrossRef]
Yaghoobi, H., and Abed, E. H., 2003, “Local Feedback Control of the Naimark-Sacker Bifurcation,” Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos Appl. Sci. Eng., 13(4), pp. 879–893. [CrossRef]
Yuan, Z., Hu, D., and Huang, L., 2005, “Stability and Bifurcation Analysis on a Discrete-Time Neural Network,” J. Comput. Math., 177, pp. 89–100. [CrossRef]
Guckenheimer, J., and Holmes, P., 1986, Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems, and Bifurcation of Vector Fields, Springer, New York.
Nayfeh, A. H., and Balachandran, B., 1995, Applied Nonlinear Dynamics, Wiley, New York.
Troger, H., and Steindl, A., 1991, Nonlinear Stability and Bifurcation Theory, Springer, New York.
Szalai, R., Stepan, G., and Hogan, S. J., 2004, “Global Dynamics of Low Immersion High-Speed Milling,” Chaos.14(4), pp. 1069–1077.
Kuznetsov, Y. A., 1998, Elements of Applied Bifurcation Theory, Springer, New York.
Moon, F. C., 1992, Chaotic and Fractal Dynamics: an Introduction for Applied Scientists and Engineers, Wiley, New York.
Farmer, J. D., Ott, E., and York, J. A., 1983, “The Dimension of Chaotic Attractors,” Physica D, 7, 153–170. [CrossRef]
Grassberger, P., and Procaccia, I., 1983, “Characterization of Strange Attractors,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 50(5), pp. 346–349. [CrossRef]
Hilborn, R. C., 2001, Chaos and Nonlinear Dynamics: an Introduction for Scientists and Engineers, Oxford University, New York.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Transformation for stability analysis

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Stability chart (a) and vibration frequencies on the stability limit (b)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Zone with phase locking in the q0 and p parameter space. The shaded area indicates the existence of an attractor with phase locking. The numbers in the circles indicate the ratio between the period of motion and τ. In the figure τ = 0.01s and Q0 = 10 m/s2.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Attractors of the map (Eqs. (21), (26) and (27)) for increasing asymmetry of the control force. The diagram has been obtained fixing p = 0.2501, τ = 0.01s and Q0 = 10 m/s2. All figures have the displacement [m] in the x-axis and the velocity [m/s] in the y-axis.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Diagram of the control force for different values of q0 with increasing asymmetry

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Bifurcation diagram for p = 0.2492, Q0 = 10 m/s2 and τ = 0.01s. Solid line: stable solutions, dashed line: unstable solutions, thin dashed-dotted line: analytical results.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Bifurcation diagram for different values of q0. Q0 = 10 m/s2 and τ = 0.01s. Solid lines: stable solutions, dashed lines: unstable solutions.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Existing attractors in the q0 and p parameter space. F: stable focus, P: stable periodic motion, C: chaotic motion. In brackets the unstable solutions. Q0 = 10 m/s2 and τ = 0.01s.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Bifurcation diagram. Solid lines: analytical results; dashed lines: numerical results. The diagrams have been obtained fixing τ = 0.01s and Q0 = 10 m/s2 and using Eq. (52) before approximation.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Asymmetric control force

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

(a): chaotic attractor of the stroboscopic map (Eqs. (21), (26) and (27)), (b): detail of the attractor to show its fractal nature, (c): Lyapunov exponent and (d): FFT of the response. q0 = 0.97, p = 0.2501Q0 = 10 m/s2, τ = 0.01s.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Bifurcation diagram for q0 = 0.67, Q0 = 10 m/s2 and τ = 0.01s. Solid line: stable solutions, dashed line: unstable solutions, dashed-dotted line; analytical results.




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In