Research Papers

Stability Analysis of Multibody Systems With Long Flexible Bodies Using the Moving Modes Method and Its Application to Railroad Dynamics

[+] Author and Article Information
Rosario Chamorro

e-mail: chamorro@esi.us.es

José L. Escalona

e-mail: escalona@us.es

Antonio M. Recuero

e-mail: amrecuero@us.es
Department of Mechanical and
Materials Engineering,
University of Seville,
Seville 41092, Spain

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Design Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND NONLINEAR DYNAMICS. Manuscript received January 15, 2013; final manuscript received April 17, 2013; published online October 4, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Hiroyuki Sugiyama.

J. Comput. Nonlinear Dynam 9(1), 011005 (Oct 04, 2013) (10 pages) Paper No: CND-13-1006; doi: 10.1115/1.4025284 History: Received January 15, 2013; Revised April 17, 2013

In order to model a long flexible body subjected to a moving load within multibody systems, the flexibility can be considered by using a special floating frame of reference approach. In this approach the body deformations are described using shape functions defined in a frame of reference that follows the load. The definition of the deformation shape functions in the load-following frame of reference leads to additional terms of the inertia forces of the flexible body. This method was recently presented by the authors and named the moving modes method. The selected shape functions used in this work are the steady deformation shown by a flexible straight body subjected to a moving load. In this investigation the new formulation is applied to the steady motion and stability analysis of railroad vehicles moving on curved tracks.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Shabana, A. A., 1997, “Flexible Multibody Dynamics: Review of Past and Recent Developments,” Multibody Syst. Dyn., 1, pp. 189–222. [CrossRef]
Craig, R., and Bampton, M., 1968, “Coupling of Substructures for Dynamics Analysis,” AIAA J., 6, pp. 1313–1319. [CrossRef]
Dwivedy, S. K., and Eberhard, P., 2006, “Dynamic Analysis of Flexible Manipulators, a Literature Review,” Mech. Mach. Theory, 41(7), pp. 749–777. [CrossRef]
Lehner, M., and Eberhard, P., 2007, “A Two-Step Approach for Model Reduction in Flexible Multibody Dynamics,” Multibody Syst. Dyn., 17, pp. 157–176. [CrossRef]
Yoo, W., and Haug, E., 1986, “Dynamics of Flexible Mechanical Systems Using Vibration and Static Correction Modes,” ASME J. Mech., Transm., Autom. Des., 108(3), pp. 315–322. [CrossRef]
Cardona, A., and Géradin, M., 1991, “Modelling of Superelements in Mechanism Analysis,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 32(8), pp. 1565–1593. [CrossRef]
Cardona, A., 2000, “Superelement Modelling in Flexible Multibody Dynamics,” Multibody Syst. Dyn., 4, pp. 245–266. [CrossRef]
Géradin, M., and Cardona, A., 2001, Flexible Multibody Dynamics. A Finite Element Approach, John Wiley and Sons, London.
Shabana, A. A., 2005, Dynamics of Multibody Systems, third ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
Chamorro, R., Escalona, J. L., and González, M., 2011, “An Approach for Modeling Long Flexible Bodies With Application to Railroad Dynamics,” Multibody Syst. Dyn., 26, pp. 135–152. [CrossRef]
Nikravesh, P. A., Ribaric, A. P., and Kazemi, O., 2010, “Challenges in Multibody Dynamic Analysis of Vehicles,” 5th Asian Conference on Multibody Dynamics 2010, Kyoto, Japan, Aug. 23–26.
Mallik, A. K., Chandra, S., and Singh, A. B., 2006, “Steady-State Response of an Elastically Supported Infinite Beam to a Moving Load,” J. Sound Vib., 291, pp. 1148–1169. [CrossRef]
Dietz, S., Hippmann, G., and Schupp, G., 2002, “Interaction of Vehicles and Flexible Tracks by Co-Simulation of Multibody Vehicle Systems and Finite Element Track Models,” Veh. Syst. Dyn., 37, pp. 372–384.
Andersson, C., and Abrahamsson, T., 2002, “Simulation of Interaction Between a Train in General Motion and a Track,” Veh. Syst. Dyn., 38(6), pp. 433–455. [CrossRef]
Kato, I., Terumichi, Y., Adachi, M., and Muller, S., 2004, “Dynamics of Track/Wheel Systems on High-Speed Vehicles,” Proceedings of the Second Asian Conference on Multibody Dynamics, Seoul, South Korea, August 1–4.
Shabana, A. A., Hussien, H. A., and Escalona, J. L., 1998, “Application of the Absolute Nodal Coordinate Formulation to Large Rotation and Large Deformation Problems,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 120(2), pp. 188–195. [CrossRef]
Shabana, A. A., Chamorro, R., and Rathod, C., 2008, “A Multi-Body System Approach for Finite-Element Modelling of Rail Flexibility in Railroad Vehicle Applications,” Journal of Multibody Dynamics, Proceedings of IMechE Part K, 222, pp. 1–15.
Rathod, C., Chamorro, R., Escalona, J. L., el Sibaie, M., and Shabana, A. A., 2009, “Validation of Three-Dimensional Multibody System Approach for Modelling Track Flexibility,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part K, 223, pp. 269–282. [CrossRef]
Xiao, X., Jin, X., Deng, Y., and Zhou, Z., 2008, “Effect of Curved Track Support Failure on Vehicle Derailment,” Veh. Syst. Dyn., 46(11), pp. 1029–1059. [CrossRef]
Young, T. H., and Li, C. Y., 2003, “Vertical Vibration Analysis of Vehicle/Imperfect Track System,” Veh. Syst. Dyn., 40(5), pp. 329–349. [CrossRef]
Knothe, K. L., and Grassie, S. L., 1993, “Modeling of Railway Track and Vehicle-Track Interaction at High Frequencies,” Veh. Syst. Dyn., 22, pp. 209–262. [CrossRef]
Shabana, A. A., 1994, Computational Dynamics, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
Escalona, J. L., and Chamorro, R., 2008, “Stability Analysis of Vehicles on Circular Motions Using Multibody Dynamics,” Nonlinear Dyn., 53, pp. 237–250. [CrossRef]
Masarati, P., 2009, “Direct Eigenanalysis of Constrained System Dynamics,” Proc. Inst. Mech.Eng., Part K, 223(4), pp. 335–342.
Recuero, A. M., Escalona, J. L., and Chamorro, R., 2012, “Coupled Railroad Vehicle-Track Dynamics Using Krylov Subspaces and the Moving Mode Shapes Method,” Proceedings of the 2nd Joint International Conference on Multibody System Dynamics, Stuttgart, Germany, May 29–June 1.
Johnson, K. L., 1985, Contact Mechanics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
Shabana, A. A., Zaazaa, K. E., and Sugiyama, H., 2008, Railroad Vehicle Dynamics: A Computational Approach, Taylor & Francis (CRC), Boca Raton.
Escalona, J. L., Chamorro, R., and Recuero, A. M., 2012, “Description of Methods for the Eigenvalue Analysis of Railroad Vehicles Including Track Flexibility,” ASME J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn., 7(4), p. 041009. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Description of the kinematics of a point

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Track locally straight

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Description of the kinematics with respect to the trajectory frame

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Wheel and rail profiles

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Wheelset lateral displacement (— rigid; - - - flexible k = 50 MN/m2)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Left tread normal contact force: R = 4000 m (— rigid; - - - k = 100 MN/m2; and ···k = 50 MN/m2)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Flange normal contact force: (a) R = 2000 m, and (b) R = 4000 m (— rigid; - - - k = 100 MN/m2; and ···k = 50 MN/m2)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

(a) k = 50 MN/m2, and (b) k = 100 MN/m2; R = 4000 m (- - - flange normal force; and — lateral deformation)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Steady state position of the wheelset (— flexible track; - - - rigid track; and ··· simplified model): (a) lateral displacement, (b) yaw angle, and (c) flange normal contact force




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In