0
Research Papers

Aspects of Symbolic Formulations in Flexible Multibody Systems

[+] Author and Article Information
Markus Burkhardt

Institute of Engineering and Computational Mechanics,
University of Stuttgart,
Stuttgart 70569, Germany
e-mail: markus.burkhardt@itm.uni-stuttgart.de

Robert Seifried

Professor
Institute of Vehicle Technology,
Dynamical Systems Group,
Department Mechanical Engineering,
University of Siegen,
Siegen 57068, Germany
e-mail: robert.seifried@uni-siegen.de

Peter Eberhard

Professor
Institute of Engineering and Computational Mechanics,
University of Stuttgart,
Stuttgart 70569, Germany
e-mail: peter.eberhard@itm.uni-stuttgart.de

Contributed by the Design Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the Journal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics. Manuscript received May 31, 2013; final manuscript received October 28, 2013; published online July 11, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Javier Cuadrado.

J. Comput. Nonlinear Dynam 9(4), 041013 (Jul 11, 2014) (8 pages) Paper No: CND-13-1114; doi: 10.1115/1.4025897 History: Received May 31, 2013; Revised October 28, 2013; Accepted October 31, 2013

The symbolic modeling of flexible multibody systems is a challenging task. This is especially the case for complex-shaped elastic bodies, which are described by a numerical model, e.g., an FEM model. The kinematic and dynamic properties of the flexible body are in this case numerical and the elastic deformations are described with a certain number of local shape functions, which results in a large amount of data that have to be handled. Both attributes do not suggest the usage of symbolic tools to model a flexible multibody system. Nevertheless, there are several symbolic multibody codes that can treat flexible multibody systems in a very efficient way. In this paper, we present some of the modifications of the symbolic research code Neweul-M2 which are needed to support flexible bodies. On the basis of these modifications, the mentioned restrictions due to the numerical flexible bodies can be eliminated. Furthermore, it is possible to re-establish the symbolic character of the created equations of motion even in the presence of these solely numerical flexible bodies.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Bauchau, O. A., 2011, Flexible Multibody Dynamics, Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
Schwertassek, R., and Wallrapp, O., 1999, Dynamik Flexibler Mehrkörpersysteme (in German), Vieweg, Braunschweig.
Ambrósio, J. A. C., and Kleiber, M., 2001, “Computational Aspects of Nonlinear Structural Systems With Large Rigid Body Motion,” Vol. 179, NATO Science Series III: Computer and Systems Sciences, IOS Press, Inc.
Wasfy, T. M., and Noor, A. K., 2003, “Computational Strategies for Flexible Multibody Systems,” Appl. Mech. Rev., 56(6), pp. 553–614. [CrossRef]
Samin, J.-C. and Fisette, P., 2003, Symbolic Modeling of Multibody Systems, Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
Shabana, A. A., 2005, Dynamics of Multibody Systems, 3rd ed., Cambridge University Press, New York.
Shi, P., and McPhee, J., 2000, “Dynamics of Flexible Multibody Systems Using Virtual Work and Linear Graph Theory,” Multibody System Dynamics, 4(4), pp. 355–381. [CrossRef]
Kurz, T., Eberhard, P., Henninger, C., and Schiehlen, W., 2010, “From Neweul to Neweul-M2: Symbolical Equations of Motion for Multibody System Analysis and Synthesis,” Multibody System Dynamics, 24(1), pp. 25–41. [CrossRef]
Fisette, P., and Samin, J.-C., 1993, “Robotran: Symbolic Generation of Multi-Body System Dynamic Equations,” Advanced Multibody System Dynamics, Vol. 20, W.Schiehlen, ed., Springer, Netherlands, pp. 373–378.
Piedbœuf, J.-C., Kövecses, J., Moore, B., and L'Archevêque, R., 2003, “Symofros: A Virtual Environment for Modeling, Simulation and Real-Time Implementation of Multibody Dynamics and Control,” Virtual Nonlinear Multibody Systems, Vol. 103, W.Schiehlen and M.Valášek, eds., Springer, Netherlands, pp. 317–324.
Kurz, T., and Eberhard, P., 2009, “Symbolic Modeling and Analysis of Elastic Multibody Systems,” Proceedings of the International Symposium on Coupled Methods in Numerical Dynamics, Brussels, Belgium, pp. 187–201.
Wallrapp, O., 1994, “Standardization of Flexible Body Modeling in Multibody System Codes, Part I: Definition of Standard Input Data,” Mechanics of Structures and Machines, 22(3), pp. 283–304. [CrossRef]
Shabana, A. A., 1996, “Resonance Conditions and Deformable Body Co-Ordinate Systems,” J. Sound Vib., 192, pp. 389–398. [CrossRef]
Schwertassek, R., Wallrapp, O., and Shabana, A., 1999, “Flexible Multibody Simulation and Choice of Shape Functions,” Nonlinear Dynamics, 20(4), pp. 361–380. [CrossRef]
Saha, S. K., and Schiehlen, W. O., 2001, “Recursive Kinematics and Dynamics for Parallel Structural Closed-Loop Multibody Systems,” Mechanics of Structures and Machines, 29(2), pp. 143–175. [CrossRef]
Kurz, T., Burkhardt, M., and Eberhard, P., 2011, “Systems with Constraint Equations in the Symbolic Multibody Simulation Software Neweul-M2,” Proceedings of the ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Multibody Dynamics, 2011, Samin, J.-C. and P. Fisette, eds.
Nowakowski, C., Fehr, J., and Eberhard, P., 2011, “Model Reduction for a Crankshaft Used in Coupled Simulations of Engines,” Proceedings of the ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Multibody Dynamics 2011, J.-C. Samin and P. Fisette, eds.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Available implementations in Neweul-M2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Kinematic relationships for non-nodal-fixed frame types

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Software management

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Comparison of the x-components of the position vectors of the weights

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Flexible components of the V-twin engine

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Multibody system of a V-twin engine

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Comparison of the time required for symbolic calculations, file export, and a simulation using different levels of abbreviations (abb) for the NewtonEuler (NE) and the RecursiveMinimal (RM) formulations

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Comparison of the different formulations with respect to the rotational speed of the crank drive and a dominant elastic coordinate

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In