0
Research Papers

Design and Performance Optimization of Large Stroke Spatial Flexures

[+] Author and Article Information
R. G. K. M. Aarts

e-mail: r.g.k.m.aarts@utwente.nl
Faculty of Engineering Technology,
University of Twente,
P.O. Box 217 Enschede,
AE 7500, The Netherlands

D. M. Brouwer

Faculty of Engineering Technology,
University of Twente,
P.O. Box 217 Enschede,
AE 7500, The Netherlands
PH 7521, The Netherlands

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Design Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND NONLINEAR DYNAMICS. Manuscript received November 29, 2012; final manuscript received October 9, 2013; published online November 7, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Johannes Gerstmayr.

J. Comput. Nonlinear Dynam 9(1), 011016 (Nov 07, 2013) (10 pages) Paper No: CND-12-1212; doi: 10.1115/1.4025669 History: Received November 29, 2012; Revised October 09, 2013

Abstract

Flexure hinges inherently lose stiffness in supporting directions when deflected. In this paper a method is presented for optimizing the geometry of flexure hinges, which aims at maximizing supporting stiffnesses. In addition, the new $∞$-flexure hinge design is presented. The considered hinges are subjected to a load and deflected an angle of up to ±20 deg. The measure of performance is defined by the first unwanted natural frequency, which is closely related to the supporting stiffnesses. During the optimization, constraints are applied to the actuation moment and the maximum occurring stress. Evaluations of a curved hinge flexure, cross revolute hinge, butterfly flexure hinge, two cross flexure hinge types, and the new $∞$-flexure hinge are presented. Each of these hinge types is described by a parameterized geometric model. A flexible multibody modeling approach is used for efficient modeling while it accounts for the nonlinear geometric behavior of the stiffnesses. The numerical efficiency of this model is very beneficial for the design optimization. The obtained optimal hinge designs are validated with a finite element model and show good agreement. The optimizations show that a significant increase in supporting stiffness, with respect to the conventional cross flexure hinge, can be achieved with the $∞$-flexure hinge.

References

Smith, S., 2000, Flexures: Elements of Elastic Mechanisms, Taylor & Francis, London, UK.
Howell, L. L., 2001, Compliant Mechanisms, Wiley, New York.
Soemers, H. J. M. R., 2010, Design Principles for Precision Mechanisms, T-Pointprint, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Folkersma, K. G. P., Boer, S. E., Brouwer, D. M., Herder, J. L., and Soemers, H. M. J. R., 2012, “A 2-dof Large Stroke Flexure Based Position Mechanism,” International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Chicago, IL, Paper No. DETC2012-70377.
Haringx, J. A., 1949, “The Cross-Spring Pivot as a Constructional Element,” Appl. Sci. Res. A, A1, pp. 313–332.
Eijk, J. van, 1985, “On the Design of Plate Spring Mechanism,” Ph.D. thesis, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
Awtar, S., 2007, “Characteristics of Beam-Based Flexure Modules,” ASME J. Mech. Design, 129, pp. 625–639.
Bauchau, O. A., Li, L., Masarati, P., and Morandini, M., 2011, “Tensorial Deformation Measures for Flexible Joints,” ASME J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn.6(3), p. 031002.
Trease, B. P., Moon, Y. M., and Kota, S., 2005, “Design of Large-Displacement Compliant Joints,” ASME J. Mech. Design, 127, pp. 788–798.
Boer, S. E., Aarts, R. G. K. M., Brouwer, D. M., and Jonker, J. B., 2010, “Multibody Modelling and Optimization of a Curved Hinge Flexure,” The 1st Joint International Conference on Multibody System Dynamics, Lappeenranta.
Jonker, J. B., and Meijaard, J. P., 1990, “SPACAR—Computer Program for Dynamic Analysis of Flexible Spatial Mechanisms and Manipulators,” Multibody Systems Handbook, Schiehlen, W. (ed.), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, pp. 123–143.
Jonker, J. B., 1989, “A Finite Element Dynamical Analyses of Spatial Mechanisms With Flexible Links,” Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng., 76, pp. 17–40.
Brouwer, D. M., Jong, B. R., de, Boer, M. J., de, Jansen, H. V., Dijk, J., van, Krijnen, G. J. M., and Soemers, H. M. J. R., 2009, “MEMS-Based Clamp With a Passive Hold Function for Precision Position Retaining of Micro Manipulators,” J. Micromech. Microeng., 19(6), p. 065027.
Zelenika, S., and De Bona, F., 2002, “Analytical and Experimental Characterisation of High-Precision Flexural Pivots Subjected to Lateral Loads,” J. Int. Soc. Prec. Eng. Nanotech., 26, pp. 381–388.
Henein, S., Spanoudakis, P., Droz, S., Myklebust, L. I., and Onillon, E., 2003, “Flexure Pivot for Aerospace Mechanisms,” Proceedings of the 10th ESMATS/ESA, San Sebastian, Paper No. ESA SP-524.
Brouwer, D. M., Meijaard, J. P., and Jonker, J. B., 2009, “Elastic Element Showing Low Stiffness Loss at Large Deflection,” Proceedings of the 24th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Precision Engineering, Monterey, CA., pp. 30–33.
Nelder, J. A., and Mead, R., 1965, “A Simplex Method for Function Minimization,” Comput. J., 7(4), pp. 308–313.
Timoshenko, S., 1922, “On the Torsion of a Prism, One of the Cross-Sections of which Remains Plane,” Proc. London Math. Soc., 20, pp. 389–397.
Timoshenko, S. P., and Goodier, J. N., 1970, Theory of Elasticity, 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.
Wiersma, D. H., Boer, S. E., Aarts, R. G. K. M., and Brouwer, D. M., 2012, “Performance Optimization of Large Stroke Spatial Flexure Hinges,” International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Paper No. DETC2012-70502.

Figures

Fig. 3

Hinge coordinate system Oxyz, actuation moment M and angle of deflection θ of the hinge

Fig. 2

Loadcase defined in the load coordinate system Oxlylzl, with principal axis of inertia x'y'z', where φ is the angle between the projection of y'-axis on the xl-yl plane and yl-axis

Fig. 1

Leaf-spring flexure (figure based on Ref. [16])

Fig. 4

Double clamped flexure with parameterized finite element beam model

Fig. 5

Constrained warping stiffening factor γ as a function of the aspect ratio i (for ν=0.3)

Fig. 6

The geometric interpretation of the loadcase, which is based on the mechanism of Ref. [4]

Fig. 7

Parameterization of the SFCH and illustration of the angle of deflection θ

Fig. 15

Isometric and front view of the parameterized CHF

Fig. 10

Parameterization of the TFCH

Fig. 11

Optimal geometry of the TFCH, with the principal axes given in the pivot of the hinge, dimensions in mm

Fig. 14

Optimal geometry of the BFH, with the principal axes given in the pivot of the hinge, dimensions in mm

Fig. 8

Optimal geometry of the SFCH with the principal axes of inertia x' and y', dimensions in mm

Fig. 9

Second eigenfrequency as a function of the angle of deflection for the optimal solutions, determined with the FE method

Fig. 12

Second eigenfrequency as a function of the angle of deflection for the optimal solution of the TFCH. Determined by SPACAR, with (SPACAR CW) and without (SPACAR) the inclusion of constrained warping, and the FE method.

Fig. 13

Parameterization of the BFH

Fig. 18

Top view of the optimized CRH geometry, dimensions in mm

Fig. 19

Isometric and front view of the parameterized ∞-FH (part 1)

Fig. 20

Isometric and front view of the parameterized ∞-FH (part 2)

Fig. 21

Optimal geometry of the ∞-FH, with the principal axes of inertia, dimensions in mm

Fig. 22

Variation of the ∞-FH as a function of parameter d

Fig. 16

Optimal geometry of the CHF, dimensions in mm

Fig. 17

Isometric view and parameterization of the CRH

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections