0
Research Papers

Nonlinear Analysis of a New Extended Lattice Model With Consideration of Multi-Anticipation and Driver Reaction Delays

[+] Author and Article Information
Jianzhong Chen

College of Automation,
Northwestern Polytechnical University,
Xi'an, Shaanxi 710072, China
e-mail: jzhchen@nwpu.edu.cn

Zhongke Shi, Lei Yu, Zhiyuan Peng

College of Automation,
Northwestern Polytechnical University,
Xi'an, Shaanxi 710072, China

Contributed by the Design Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND NONLINEAR DYNAMICS. Manuscript received April 22, 2013; final manuscript received January 4, 2014; published online February 13, 2014. Assoc. Editor: D. Dane Quinn.

J. Comput. Nonlinear Dynam 9(3), 031005 (Feb 13, 2014) (8 pages) Paper No: CND-13-1088; doi: 10.1115/1.4026444 History: Received April 22, 2013; Revised January 04, 2014

A new extended lattice model of traffic flow is presented by taking into account both multianticipative behavior and the reaction-time delay of drivers. The linear stability theory and the nonlinear analysis method are applied to the model. The linear stability condition is obtained. The Korteweg–de Vries (KdV) equation near the neutral stability line and the modified Korteweg–de Vries (mKdV) equation near the critical point are derived. The numerical results show that the stability of traffic flow will be enhanced by multianticipative consideration and will be weakened with the increase of the reaction-time delay. The unfavorable effect induced by driver reaction delays can be partly compensated by considering multianticipative behavior.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Nagatani, T., 1998, “Modified KdV Equation for Jamming Transition in the Continuum Models of Traffic,” Physica A, 261(3–4), pp. 599–607. [CrossRef]
Nagatani, T., 1999, “TDGL and MKdV Equations for Jamming Transition in the Lattice Models of Traffic,” Physica A, 264(3–4), pp. 581–592. [CrossRef]
Li, Z. P., Li, X. L., and Liu, F. Q., 2008, “Stabilization Analysis and Modified KdV Equation of Lattice Models With Consideration of Relative Current,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. C, 19(8), pp. 1163–1173. [CrossRef]
Tian, J. F., Jia, B., Li, X. G., and Gao, Z. Y., 2010, “Flow Difference Effect in the Lattice Hydrodynamic Model,” Chin. Phys. B, 19(4), p. 040303. [CrossRef]
Peng, G. H., 2013, “A New Lattice Model of Two-Lane Traffic Flow With the Consideration of Optimal Current Difference,” Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 18(3), pp. 559–566. [CrossRef]
Xue, Y., 2004, “Lattice Models of the Optimal Traffic Current,” Acta Phys. Sin., 53(1), pp. 25–30.
Ge, H. X., Dai, S. Q., Xue, Y., and Dong, L. Y., 2005, “Stabilization Analysis and Modified Korteweg-de Vries Equation in a Cooperative Driving System,” Phys. Rev. E, 71(6), p. 066119. [CrossRef]
Wang, T., Gao, Z. Y., and Zhao, X. M., 2012, “Multiple Flux Difference Effect in the Lattice Hydrodynamic Model,” Chin. Phys. B, 21(2), p. 020512. [CrossRef]
Sun, D. H., Tian, C., and Liu, W. N., 2010, “A Traffic Flow Lattice Model Considering Relative Current Influence and Its Numerical Simulation,” Chin. Phys. B, 19(8), p. 080514. [CrossRef]
Li, Z. P., Liu, F. Q., and Sun, J., 2011, “A Lattice Traffic Model With Consideration of Preceding Mixture Traffic Information,” Chin. Phys. B, 20(8), p. 088901. [CrossRef]
Xie, D. F., Gao, Z. Y., and Zhao, X. M., 2008, “Stabilization of Traffic Flow Based on the Multiple Information of Preceding Cars,” Comm. Comp. Phys., 3(4), pp. 899–912.
Peng, G. H., and Sun, D. H., 2010, “A Dynamical Model of Car-Following With the Consideration of the Multiple Information of Preceding Cars,” Phys. Lett. A, 374(15–16), pp. 1694–1698. [CrossRef]
Jin, Y. F., Xu, M., and Gao, Z. Y., 2011, “KdV and Kink-Antikink Solitons in an Extended Car-Following Model,” ASME J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn., 6(1), p. 011018. [CrossRef]
Yang, S. H., Liu, W. N., Sun, D. H., and Li, C. G., 2013, “A New Extended Multiple Car-Following Model Considering the Backward-Looking Effect on Traffic Flow,” ASME J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn., 8(1), p. 011016. [CrossRef]
Lenz, H., Wagner, C. K., and Sollacher, R., 1999, “Multi-Anticipative Car-Following Model,” Eur. Phys. J. B, 7(2), pp. 331–335. [CrossRef]
Treiber, M., Kesting, A., and Helbing, D., 2006, “Delays, Inaccuracies and Anticipation in Microscopic Traffic Models,” Physica A, 360(1), pp. 71–88. [CrossRef]
Ossen, S., and Hoogendoorn, S. P., 2006, “Multi-Anticipation and Heterogeneity in Car-Following: Empirics and a First Exploration of Their Implications,” IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference, Toronto, Canada, 17–20 September, pp. 1615–1620.
Mo, Y. L., He, H. D., Xue, Y., Shi, W., and Lu, W. Z., 2008, “Effect of Multi-Velocity-Difference in Traffic Flow,” Chin. Phys. B, 17(12), pp. 4446–4450. [CrossRef]
Bando, M., Hasebe, K., Shibata, A., and Sugiyama, Y., 1995, “Dynamical Model of Traffic Congestion and Numerical Simulation,” Phys. Rev. E, 51(2), pp. 1035–1042. [CrossRef]
Treiber, M., Hennecke, A., and Helbing, D., 2000, “Congested Traffic States in Empirical Observations and Microscopic Simulation,” Phys. Rev. E, 62(2), pp. 1805–1824. [CrossRef]
Helly, W., 1959, “Simulation of Bottlenecks in Single Lane Traffic Flow,” International Symposium on the Theory of Traffic Flow, pp. 207–238.
Bando, M., Hasebe, K., Nakanishi, K., and Nakayama, A., 1998, “Analysis of Optimal Velocity Model With Explicit Delay,” Phys. Rev. E, 58(5), pp. 5429–5435. [CrossRef]
Orosz, G., Wilson, R. E., and Krauskopf, B., 2004, “Global Bifurcation Investigation of an Optimal Velocity Traffic Model With Driver Reaction Time,” Phys. Rev. E, 70(2), p. 026207. [CrossRef]
Davis, L. C., 2003, “Modifications of the Optimal Velocity Traffic Model to Include Delay Due to Driver Reaction Time,” Physica A, 319, pp. 557–567. [CrossRef]
Yu, L., Li, T., and Shi, Z. K., 2010, “Density Waves in a Traffic Flow Model With Reaction-Time Delay,” Physica A, 389(13), pp. 2607–2616. [CrossRef]
Zhu, H. B., and Dai, S. Q., 2008, “Analysis of Car-Following Model Considering Driver's Physical Delay in Sensing Headway,” Physica A, 387(13), pp. 3290–3298. [CrossRef]
Ge, H. X., Meng, X. P., Cheng, R. J., and Lo, S. M., 2011, “Time-Dependent Ginzburg-Landau Equation in a Car-Following Model Considering the Driver's Physical Delay,” Physica A, 390(1), pp. 3348–3353. [CrossRef]
Chen, J. Z., Shi, Z. K., and Hu, Y. M., 2012. “Stabilization Analysis of a Multiple Look-Ahead Model With Driver Reaction Delays,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. C, 23(6), p. 1250048. [CrossRef]
Tordeux, A., Lassarre, S., and Roussignol, M., 2010, “An Adaptive Time Gap Car-Following Model,” Transp. Res. B, 44(8–9), pp. 1115–1131. [CrossRef]
Lassarre, S., Roussignol, M., and Tordeux, A., 2012, “Linear Stability Analysis of First-Order Delayed Car-Following Models on a Ring,” Phys. Rev. E, 86(3), p. 036207. [CrossRef]
Kang, Y. R., and Sun, D. H., 2013, “Lattice Hydrodynamic Traffic Flow Model With Explicit Drivers' Physical Delay,” Nonlinear Dyn., 71(3), pp. 531–537. [CrossRef]
Wilson, R. E., Berg, P., Hooper, S., and Lunt, G., 2004, “Many-Neighbour Interaction and Non-Locality in Traffic Models,” Eur. Phys. J. B, 39(3), pp. 397–408. [CrossRef]
Ge, H. X., 2009, “The Korteweg-de Vries Soliton in the Lattice Hydrodynamic Model,” Physica A, 388(8), pp. 1682–1686. [CrossRef]
Ge, H. X., Cheng, R. J., and Dai, S. Q., 2005, “KdV and Kink-Antikink Solitons in Car-Following Models,” Physica A, 357(3–4), pp. 466–476. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

The phase diagram in parameter space (ρ, a) for m = 3 with different values of td

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

The phase diagram in parameter space (ρ, a) for different values of m with td=0.3

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Space-time evolutions of the density after t = 10,000 (a) td=0.0 (b) td = 0.2 (c) td = 0.4 (d) td = 0.6

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Density profiles of the density waves at t = 10300 (a) td=0.0 (b) td = 0.2 (c) td = 0.4 (d) td = 0.6

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Space-time evolutions of the density after t = 10,000 (a) m = 1 (b) m = 2 (c) m = 3 (d) m = 5

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Density profiles of the density waves at t = 10,300 (a) m = 1 (b) m = 2 (c) m = 3 (d) m = 5

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

The critical sensitivity ac against td

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

The amplitude C of the kink-antikink soliton against td

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In