Research Papers

Dynamic Response Analysis of Wind Turbine Gearbox Using Simplified Local Tooth Stiffness of Internal Gear System

[+] Author and Article Information
J. R. Cho

School of Mechanical Engineering,
Pusan National University,
Busan 609-735, Korea
Research and Development Institute of Midas IT,
Gyeonggi 463-400, Korea
e-mail: jrcho@pusan.ac.kr

K. Y. Jeong, M. H. Park, N. G. Park

School of Mechanical Engineering,
Pusan National University,
Busan 609-735, Korea

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Design Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the Journal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics. Manuscript received February 20, 2013; final manuscript received February 21, 2014; published online April 2, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Carlo L. Bottasso.

J. Comput. Nonlinear Dynam 10(4), 041001 (Jul 01, 2015) (9 pages) Paper No: CND-13-1046; doi: 10.1115/1.4026934 History: Received February 20, 2013; Revised February 21, 2014; Online April 02, 2015

This paper presents a dynamic finite element analysis model for a wind turbine gearbox in which a number of internal gears mesh with each other in a complex pattern. Differing from the conventional dynamic models in which the detailed gear teeth are fully modeled or gears and shafts are replaced with lumped masses, the tooth contact between a pair of gears is modeled using a spring element. The equivalent spring constant is determined by computing the stiffness of a gear tooth using a finite element analysis. The numerical accuracy of the proposed dynamic model is verified through a benchmark experiment of a gearbox with simple gear transmission system. In addition, the natural frequencies and dynamic responses of a 5 MW wind turbine gearbox that are obtained by the proposed modeling technique are given to support its validity and effectiveness.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Hansen, A. D., and Hansen, L. H., 2007, “Wind Turbine Concept Market Penetration Over 10 Years (1995–2004),” Wind Energy, 10, pp. 81–97. [CrossRef]
Walker, J. F., and Jenkins, N., 1997, Wind Energy Technology, Wiley, New York.
Paraschivoiu, I., 2002, “Wind Turbine Design With Emphasis on Darrieus Concept,” Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal, Canada.
American Gear Manufacturers Association, 2003, “American National Standard for Design and Specification of Gearboxes for Wind Turbines,” Paper No. ANSI/AGMA/AWEA 6006-103.
Quarton, D. C., 1998, “The Evolution of Wind Turbine Design Analysis—A Twenty Year Progress Review,” Wind Energy, 1, pp. 5–24. [CrossRef]
Hansen, M. O. L., 2008, Aerodynamics of Wind Turbines, Earthscan, London, UK.
Novak, P., Ekelund, T., Jovik, I., and Schmidtbauer, B., 1995, “Modeling and Control of Variable-Speed Wind-Turbine Srive-System Dynamics,” IEEE Control Syst., 15(4), pp. 28–38. [CrossRef]
Cho, J. R., Lee, H. W., and Ha, S. Y., 2005, “Finite Element Analysis of Resonant Sloshing Response in 2-D Baffled Tank,” J. Sound Vib., 288(4–5), pp. 829–845. [CrossRef]
Yao, X., Guo, C., Zhong, M., Li, Y., Shan, G., and Zhang, Y., 2009, “Wind Turbine Gearbox Fault Diagnosis Using Adaptive Morlet Wavelet Spectrum,” Proc. 2nd Int. Conference on Intelligent Computation Technology and Automation, Hunan, China, pp. 580–583.
Musial, W., Butterfield, S., and McNiff, B., 2007, “Improving Wind Turbine Gearbox Reliability,” European Wind Energy Conference, Milan, Italy, May 7–10, Paper No. NREL/CP-500-41548.
Qin, D., Wang, J., and Lim, T. C., 2009, “Flexible Multibody Dynamic Modeling of a Horizontal Wind Turbine Drivetrain System,” ASME J. Mech. Design, 131(10), p. 114501. [CrossRef]
Cho, J. R., Song, J. M., and Lee, J. K., 2001, “Finite Element Techniques for the Free-Vibration and Seismic Analysis of Liquid-Storage Tanks,” Finite Elements Anal. Design, 37(6–7), pp. 467–483. [CrossRef]
Li, H., and Chen, Z., 2007, “Transient Stability Analysis of Wind Turbines With Induction Generators Considering Blades and Shaft Flexibility,” Proc. the 33rd Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, Taipei, Taiwan, November 5–8, pp. 1604–1609.
Garcia, M. C., Sanz-Bobi, M. A., and del Pico, J., 2006, “SIMAP: Intelligent System for Predictive Maintenance Allocation to the Health Condition Monitoring of a Windturbine Gearbox,” Comput. Industry, 57(6), pp. 552–568. [CrossRef]
Torrance, V. B., 1972, “Wind Profiles Over a Suburban Site and Wind Effects on a Half-Scale Model Building,” Build. Sci., 7(1), pp. 1–12. [CrossRef]
Midas, IT., 2010, “On-Line User's Manual of Midas NFX,” Gyeonggi, Korea. Available at: http://www.nfx.co.kr/Downloads/


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Finite element model for evaluating the tooth stiffness coefficient

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

A dynamic model considering the gear tooth contact

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

A simple dynamic model by utilizing the mass lumping technique

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Wind-induced dynamic forces and moments acting on the wind turbine

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Horizontal-axis wind turbine: (a) configuration; (b) detailed components (AGMA, 2003)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

A simple gear transmission system composed of three gear shafts (unit: mm)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

First mode shapes of three different models: (a) full model (27.111 Hz); (b) simple model (28.625 Hz); (c) present model (27.258 Hz)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Second mode shapes of three different models: (a) full model (50.586 Hz); (b) simple model (44.855 Hz); (c) present model (50.301 Hz)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Comparison of the dynamic responses at point A: (a) time responses; (b) frequency responses

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

A three-stage 5 MW wind turbine gearbox: (a) internal gear system; (b) FEM model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Mode shapes: (a) first mode (18.256 Hz, vertical vibration); (b) second mode (33.251 Hz, torsional vibration); (c) third mode (47.321 Hz, horizontal vibration)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Dynamic responses at torque arms: (a) time responses; (b) frequency responses

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Dynamic responses at gearbox case: (a) time responses; (b) frequency responses

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Internal gear transmission and four evaluation points

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Time responses: (a) at A; (b) at B; (c) at C; (d) at D

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Frequency responses at four different points



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In