0
Research Papers

Aeroelastic Tailoring of Helicopter Blades

[+] Author and Article Information
Donatien Cornette

Dynamics Department,
Airbus Helicopters,
Marignane Cedex F-13725, France
e-mail: donatien.cornette@isae.fr

Benjamin Kerdreux

Dynamics Engineer
Dynamics Department,
Airbus Helicopters,
Marignane Cedex F-13725, France
e-mail: benjamin.kerdreux@airbus.com

Guilhem Michon

Associate Professor
Université de Toulouse, ISAE,
ICA (Institut Clément Ader),
Toulouse F-31055, France
e-mail: guilhem.michon@isae.fr

Yves Gourinat

Professor
Université de Toulouse, ISAE,
ICA (Institut Clément Ader),
Toulouse F-31055, France
e-mail: yves.gourinat@isae.fr

Pitch corresponds to the rigid rotation along the spanwise axis imposed by the control system, flap is the out-of-plane motion of the blade, lead-lag corresponds to the in-plane motion and torsion deals with the elastic rotation of blade around the spanwise axis. The notation nΩ, corresponding to the nth harmonic of rotation speed, is a pulsation and represents an event that occurs n times per revolution (n/rev).

1Corresponding author.

2Pitch corresponds to the rigid rotation along the spanwise axis imposed by the control system, flap is the out-of-plane motion of the blade, lead-lag corresponds to the in-plane motion and torsion deals with the elastic rotation of blade around the spanwise axis. The notation nΩ, corresponding to the nth harmonic of rotation speed, is a pulsation and represents an event that occurs n times per revolution (n/rev).

Contributed by the Design Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND NONLINEAR DYNAMICS. Manuscript received March 12, 2014; final manuscript received May 1, 2014; published online April 9, 2015. Assoc. Editor: José L. Escalona.

J. Comput. Nonlinear Dynam 10(6), 061001 (Nov 01, 2015) (12 pages) Paper No: CND-14-1073; doi: 10.1115/1.4027717 History: Received March 12, 2014; Revised May 01, 2014; Online April 09, 2015

The dynamic loads transmitted from the rotor to the airframe are responsible for vibrations, discomfort and alternate stress on components. A new and promising way to minimize vibration is to reduce dynamic loads at their source by performing an aeroelastic optimization of the rotor. This optimization uses couplings between the flapwise-bending motion and the torsion motion. The impacts of elastic couplings (composite anisotropy) and inertial couplings (center-of-gravity offset) on blade dynamic behavior and on dynamic loads are evaluated in this paper. First, analytical results, based on a purely linear modal approach, are given to understand the influence of these couplings on blade dynamic behavior. Then, a complete nonlinear aeroelastic model of the rotor, including elastic and inertial couplings, is derived. Finally, this last model is used to improve a simplified but representative blade (homogeneous beam with constant chord) and results are presented.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Blue edge™ planform

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Assumed mode method

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Induced flow at μ = 0.3

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Modal shear loads at 4 Ω and 5 Ω normalized by the total shear load: TzinΩ/TznΩ. (a) Tzi4Ω and (b) Tzi5Ω.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Modal shear loads at 4 Ω and 5 Ω for a mass without center-of-gravity offset compared to the initial case without mass (dotted line). (a) Tzi4Ω - ωθ1 = 5.3Ω and (b) Tzi5Ω - ωθ1 = 5.3Ω.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Modal shear loads at 4 Ω and 5 Ω normalized by the total shear load for a mass position toward the leading edge compared to the case without the mass chordwise offset (dotted line). (a) Tzi4Ω - ωθ1 = 4.3 Ω, (b) Tzi4Ω - ωθ1 = 5.3 Ω, (c) Tzi5Ω - ωθ1 = 4.3 Ω, and (d) Tzi5Ω - ωθ1 = 5.3 Ω.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Modal shear loads at 4 Ω and 5 Ω normalized by the total shear load for a mass position toward the trailing edge compared to the case without the mass chordwise offset (dotted line). (a) Tzi4Ω - ωθ1 = 4.3 Ω, (b) Tzi4Ω - ωθ1 = 5.3 Ω, (c) Tzi5Ω - ωθ1 = 4.3 Ω, and (d) Tzi5Ω - ωθ1 = 5.3 Ω.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Modal shear loads at 4 Ω and 5 Ω normalized by the total shear load for a mass position toward the leading edge and with bending-torsion stiffness, compared to the case without bending-torsion stiffness and with a mass chordwise offset (dotted line). (a) Tzi4Ω - K45 < 0, (b) Tzi4Ω - K45 > 0, (c) Tzi5Ω - K45 < 0, and (d) Tzi5Ω - K45 > 0.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Third flapwise-bending mode aerodynamic generalized load at 4 Ω and 5 Ω compared to the case without bending-torsion stiffness and with a mass chordwise offset (dotted line). (a) Qβ˜34Ω - K45 < 0, (b) Qβ˜34Ω - K45 > 0, (c) Qβ˜35Ω - K45 < 0, and (d) Qβ˜35Ω - K45 > 0.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In