Research Papers

Probabilistic Performance of Helical Compound Planetary System in Wind Turbine

[+] Author and Article Information
Fisseha M. Alemayehu

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Texas Tech University,
Lubbock, TX 79409
e-mails: fisseha.alemayehu@ttu.edu; fma12@psu.edu

Stephen Ekwaro-Osire

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Whitacre College of Engineering,
Texas Tech University,
Lubbock, TX 79409
e-mail: stephen.ekwaro-osire@ttu.edu

1Current address: Penn State, Hazleton, Hazleton, PA 18202.

2Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Design Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND NONLINEAR DYNAMICS. Manuscript received November 11, 2013; final manuscript received June 24, 2014; published online April 2, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Carlo L. Bottasso.

J. Comput. Nonlinear Dynam 10(4), 041003 (Jul 01, 2015) (12 pages) Paper No: CND-13-1275; doi: 10.1115/1.4027921 History: Received November 11, 2013; Revised June 24, 2014; Online April 02, 2015

The dynamics of contact, stress and failure analysis of multibody systems is highly nonlinear. Nowadays, several commercial and other analysis software dedicated for this purpose are available. However, these codes do not consider the uncertainty involved in loading, design, and assembly parameters. One of these systems with a combined high nonlinearity and uncertainty of parameters is the gearbox of wind turbines (WTs). Wind turbine gearboxes (WTG) are subjected to variable torsional and nontorsional loads. In addition, the manufacturing and assembly process of these devices results in uncertainty of the design parameters of the system. These gearboxes are reported to fail in their early life of operation, within three to seven years as opposed to the expected twenty years of operation. Their downtime and maintenance process is the most costly of any failure of subassembly of WTs. The objective of this work is to perform a probabilistic multibody dynamic analysis (PMBDA) of a helical compound planetary stage of a selected wind turbine gearbox that considers ten random variables: two loading (the rotor speed, generator side torque), and eight design parameters. The reliability or probabilities of failure of each gear and probabilistic sensitivities of the input variables toward two performance functions have been measured and conclusions have been drawn. The results revealed that PMBDA has demonstrated a new approach of gear system design beyond a traditional deterministic approach. The method demonstrated the components' reliability or probability of failure and sensitivity results that will be used as a tool for designers to make sound decisions.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Lewis, W., 1893, “Investigations of the Strength of Gear Teeth,” Proceedings of the Engineers Club of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 16–23.
Haldar, A., and Mahadevan, S., 1999, Probability, Reliability and Statistical Methods in Engineering Design, Wiley, New York.
Musial, W., Butterfield, S., and McNiff, B., 2007, “Improving Wind Turbine Gearbox Reliability,” European Wind Energy Conference, Milan, Italy.
Oyague, F., 2009, “Gearbox Modeling and Load Simulation of a Baseline 750-kW Wind Turbine Using State-of-the-Art Simulation Codes,” Golden, CO.
Ribrant, J., and Bertling, L. M., 2007, “Survey of Failures in Wind Power Systems With Focus on Swedish Wind Power Plants During 1997–2005,” IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., 22(1), pp. 167–173. [CrossRef]
Puigcorbe, J., and De-Beaumont, A., 2010, “Wind Turbine Gearbox Reliability: The Impact of Rotor Support,” Renew. Energy World Mag., 14(3), pp. 67–73.
Zimmerman, G., 2010, “Tuned to the Forces of Nature,” Mech. Eng., 132(5), pp. 46–49.
Van Rensselar, J., 2010, “The Elephant in the Wind Turbine,” Tribol. Lubr. Technol., 66(6), pp. 39–48.
Oyague, F., Butterfield, C. P., and Sheng, S., 2009, “Gearbox Reliability Collaborative Analysis Round Robin Preprint,” American Wind Energy Association, Chicago, IL.
Smolders, K., Long, H., Feng, Y., and Tavner, P., 2010, “Reliability Analysis and Prediction of Wind Turbine Gearboxes,” European Wind Energy Conference, Warsaw, Poland.
Helsen, J., Vandepitte, D., and Desmet, W., 2010, “Flexible Modelling of Wind Turbine Gearboxes With Special Focus on Shaft Flexibilities,” Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Recent Advances in Structural Dynamics (RASD), Southampton, UK.
Crowther, A., Ramakrishnan, V., Zaidi, N. A., and Halse, C., 2011, “Sources of Time-Varying Contact Stress and Misalignments in Wind Turbine Planetary Sets,” Wind Energy, 14(5), pp. 637–651. [CrossRef]
Peeters, J., 2006, “Simulation of Dynamic Drive Train Loads in a Wind Turbine,” Ph.D. thesis, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Grujicic, M., Arakere, G., Bell, W. C., Marvi, H., Yalavarthy, H. V., Pandurangan, B., Haque, I., and Fadel, G. M., 2009, “Reliability-Based Design Optimization for Durability of Ground Vehicle Suspension System Components,” J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 19(3), pp. 301–313. [CrossRef]
He, B.-Y., and Wang, S.-X., 2005, “Study on the Dynamic Model and Simulation of a Flexible Mechanical Arm Considering Its Random Parameters,” J. Mech. Sci. Technol., 19(1), pp. 265–271. [CrossRef]
Oswald, F. B., Townsend, D. P., Rebbechi, B., and Lin, H.-H., 1996, “Dynamic Forces in Spur Gears Measurement, Prediction, and Code Validation,” Seventh International Power Transmission and Gearing Conference, ASME, San Diego, CA.
Alemayehu, F. M., and Ekwaro-Osire, S., 2013, “Uncertainty Considerations in the Dynamic Loading and Failure of Spur Gear Pairs,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 135(8), p. 084501. [CrossRef]
Alemayehu, F. M., and Ekwaro-Osire, S., 2013, “Loading and Design Parameter Uncertainty in the Dynamics and Performance of High-Speed-Parallel-Helical Stage of a Wind Turbine Gearbox,” ASME Paper No. DETC2013-13638 [CrossRef]
Alemayehu, F. M., Ekwaro-Osire, S., and Karpat, F., 2013, “Uncertainty Consideration in Multibody Dynamic Analysis of Helical-Gear-Pairs,” International Conference on Gears: VDI-Berichte 2199, VDI Wissensforum GmbH, ed., VDI Verlag GmbH, Düsseldorf, Germany, Vol. 1, pp. 427–438.
Ligata, H., Kahraman, A., and Singh, A., 2008, “An Experimental Study of the Influence of Manufacturing Errors on the Planetary Gear Stresses and Planet Load Sharing,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 130(4), p. 041701. [CrossRef]
Ligata, H., Kahraman, A., and Singh, A., 2009, “A Closed-Form Planet Load Sharing Formulation for Planetary Gear Sets Using Translational Analogy,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 131(2), p. 021007. [CrossRef]
Riha, D., Bichon, B., McFarland, J., and Fitch, S., 2010, “NESSUS Theoretical Manual,” San Antonio, TX.
Alemayehu, F. M., and Ekwaro-Osire, S., 2011, “Probabilistic Multibody Modeling of Gearboxes for Wind Turbines,” ASME Paper No. ASMECP002011054938000793000001 [CrossRef].
Alemayehu, F. M., and Ekwaro-Osire, S., 2012, “Uncertainty Considerations in the Dynamics of Gear-Pair,” ASME Paper No. IMECE2012-89751. [CrossRef]
Southwest Research Institute, “NESSUS Overview,” http://www.nessus.swri.org/
Budynas, G. R., and Nisbett, J. K., 2011, Shigley's Mechanical Engineering Design, The McGraw−Hill Companies, New York.
Jonkman, J. M., and Buhl, M. L. J., 2005, “FAST User's Guide,” NREL/EL-500-38230, Golden, CO.
Jonkman, J. B., and Kilcher, L., 2012, “TurbSim User's Guide: Version 1.06.00,” September, Golden CO.
Laino, D. J., and Hansen, A. C., 2002, “User's Guide to the Wind Turbine Aerodynamics Computer Software AeroDyn,” Salt Lake City, UT.
Malcolm, D., and Hansen, A., 2006, “WindPACT Turbine Rotor Design Study,” NREL/SR-500-32495, Golden, CO.
Germanischer Lloyd Industrial Services GmbH, 2010, “IV-Rules and Guidelines Industrial Services, Part 1-Guideline for the Certification of Wind Turbines GL 2010,” Germanischer Lloyd, Hamburg, Germany.
International Electrotechnical Commission, 2005, “Wind Turbine—Part 1: Design Requirements, IEC 61400-1,” International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva, Switzerland.
International Electrotechnical Commission, 2012, “Wind Turbines—Part 3: Design Requirements for Offshore Wind Turbines,” IEC 61400-3, International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva, Switzerland.
Guo, Y., Keller, J., Sheng, S., Veers, P., LaCava, W., Austin, J., Houser, D., Nejad, A. R., Xing, Y., Gao, Z., Moan, T., Halse, C., Crowther, A., Vijayakar, S., Helsen, J., and Bastard, L., 2014, “Gearbox Reliability Collaborative Modeling Round Robin: Gearbox System Modeling Practice, Preprint,” NREL TP 5000-60641, Golden, CO.
Xing, Y., and Moan, T., 2013, “Multibody Modelling and Analysis of a Planet Carrier in a Wind Turbine Gearbox,” Wind Energy, 16, pp. 1067–1089. [CrossRef]
Guo, Y., Keller, J., and LaCava, W., 2014, “Planetary Gear Load Sharing of Wind Turbine Drivetrains Subjected to Non-Torque Loads,” Wind Energy, (prepublication). [CrossRef]
Johnson, K. L., 1985, Contact Mechanics, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic of the 1.5 MW compound WTGs

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Loaded flexible MBD model of the 1.5 MW WTG and power flow

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Stochastic upstream wind velocity at hub-height

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Determination of extreme value (Gumbel) distribution parameters using MLE (a) rotor speed, NLSS and (b) torque on ISS, TISS

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Distribution fitting to 40 s loading data (a) NLSS and (b) TISS

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Flexible MBD model of CPHS of the 1.5 MW WTG

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Second R-PP tooth mesh (a) tooth mesh force (b) contact incidence location along the face width

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Second SP-PG tooth mesh (a) tooth mesh force (b) contact incidence location along the face width

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Convergence test of GSTIFF-SI2 and HHT-I3 integrators through x-component mesh force results (a) SP-PG1 and (b) R-PP1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

CDF of the tangential component of the (a) R-PP tooth mesh force and (b) SP-PG tooth mesh force

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Probabilistic sensitivity factor of the tooth mesh force of the SP and PG with respect to (a) the mean of and (b) the SD of all random variables

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

CDF of the root bending stress of the (a) ring and (b) PP

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

CDF of root bending stress with picture of failed ring and PP

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

CDF of the root bending stress of the SP and PG




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In