0
Research Papers

Large Scale Validation of a Flexible Multibody Wind Turbine Gearbox Model

[+] Author and Article Information
Frederik Vanhollebeke

ZF Wind Power Antwerpen NV,
Ottergemsesteenweg 439,
Gent B-9000Belgium
Division PMA,
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
KULeuven,
Celestijnenlaan 300B,
Heverlee B-3001, Belgium
e-mail: frederik.vanhollebeke@zf.com

Pepijn Peeters, Jan Helsen, Dirk Vandepitte, Wim Desmet

Division PMA,
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
KULeuven,
Celestijnenlaan 300B,
Heverlee B-3001, Belgium

Emilio Di Lorenzo, Simone Manzato

Siemens PLM,
Test RTD Siemens Industry Software N.V.,
Interleuvenlaan 68,
Leuven B-3000, Belgium

Joris Peeters

ZF Wind Power Antwerpen NV,
De Villermontstraat 9,
Kontich B-2550, Belgium

Contributed by the Design Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND NONLINEAR DYNAMICS. Manuscript received November 28, 2013; final manuscript received September 17, 2014; published online April 3, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Carlo L. Bottasso.

J. Comput. Nonlinear Dynam 10(4), 041006 (Jul 01, 2015) (12 pages) Paper No: CND-13-1305; doi: 10.1115/1.4028600 History: Received November 28, 2013; Revised September 17, 2014; Online April 03, 2015

Although wind turbine noise is mainly dominated by aero-acoustic noise, mechanical noise, coming from gearbox or generator, could—especially when it contains audible tonal components—result in nonconformity to local noise regulations. To reduce the mechanical noise from the gearbox, focus is put on first time right design. To achieve this, simulation models are being used earlier in the design process to predict possible issues. This paper starts with a short overview of the used model and gives additional insight in how forces from planetary gear stages should be introduced in the flexible housing. Main focus of this paper however is the approach that is being used to validate such a complex multibody model of a wind turbine gearbox. The validation approach consists of five levels: (1) individual components, (2) assembly of the empty gearbox housing, (3) the assembled gearbox, (4) the gearbox on the end-of-line (EOL) test rig, and (5) the gearbox in the wind turbine. This paper focuses on the experimental measurement results, the correlation approach for such complex models, and the results of this correlation for the first four levels showing the usability of these models to accurately predict the modal behavior.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Goris, S., Vanhollebeke, F., Ribbentrop, A., Markiewicz, M., Schneider, L., Wartzack, S., Hendrickx, W., and Desmet, W., 2013, “A Validated Virtual Prototyping Approach for Avoiding Wind Turbine Tonality,” Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Wind Turbine Noise, Denver, CO, Aug. 28–30, pp. 1–10.
Özgüven, H. N., and Houser, D., 1988, “Mathematical Models Used in Gear Dynamics. A Review,” J. Sound Vib., 121(3), pp. 383–411. [CrossRef]
He, S., Singh, R., and Pavic, G., 2008, “Effect of Sliding Friction on Gear Noise Based on a Refined Vibro-Acoustic Formulation,” Noise Control Eng. J., 56(3), pp. 164–175. [CrossRef]
Lim, T., and Singh, R., 1990, “Vibration Transmission Through Rolling Element Bearings, Part I: Bearing Stiffness Formulation,” J. Sound Vib., 139(2), pp. 179–199. [CrossRef]
Lim, T., and Singh, R., 1990, “Vibration Transmission Through Rolling Element Bearings, Part II: System Studies,” J. Sound Vib., 139(2), pp. 201–225. [CrossRef]
Lim, T., and Singh, R., 1991, “Vibration Transmission Through Rolling Element Bearings—Part III: Geared Rotor System Studies,” J. Sound Vib., 151(1), pp. 31–54. [CrossRef]
Hambric, S., Hanford, A., Shepherd, M., Campbell, R., and Smith, E., 2010, “Rotorcraft Transmission Noise Path Model, Including Distributed Fluid Film Bearing Impedance Modeling,” NASA Contractor Report No. NASA/CR-2010-216812.
Hambric, S., Shepherd, M., and Campbell, 2012, “Modeling Vibration Transmission in Gearbox/Shafting Systems Using an Augmented Component Mode Synthesis Approach,” Internoise Noise-Con Congr. Conf. Proc., 244(1), pp. 93–104.
Hambric, S. A., Shepherd, M. R., Campbell, R. L., and Hanford, A. D., 2013, “Simulations and Measurements of the Vibroacoustic Effects of Replacing Rolling Element Bearings With Journal Bearings in a Simple Gearbox,” ASME J. Vib. Acoust., 135(3), p. 031012. [CrossRef]
Parker, R. G., Guo, Y., Eritenel, T., and Ericson, T. M., 2012, “Vibration Propagation of Gear Dynamics in a Gear-Bearing-Housing System Using Mathematical Modeling and Finite Element Analysis,” NASA Contractor Report No. NASA/CR-2012-217664.
Guo, Y., Eritenel, T., Ericson, T. M., and Parker, R. G., 2014, “Vibro-Acoustic Propagation of Gear Dynamics in a Gear-Bearing-Housing System,” J. Sound Vib., 333(22), pp. 5762–5785. [CrossRef]
Musial, W., Butterfield, S., and McNiff, B., 2007, “Improving Wind Turbine Gearbox Reliability,” European Wind Energy Conference, Milan, Italy, May 7–10, pp. 7–10.
Oyague, F., Gorman, D., and Sheng, S., 2010, “Nrel Gearbox Reliability Collaborative Experimental Data Overview and Analysis,” Windpower Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, TX, May 23–26, Paper No. NREL/CP-500-48232.
Link, H., LaCava, W., Van Dam, J., McNiff, B., Sheng, S., Wallen, R., McDade, M., Lambert, S., Butterfield, S., and Oyague, F., 2011, “Gearbox Reliability Collaborative Project Report: Findings From Phase 1 and Phase 2 Testing,” NREL, Technical Report No. NREL/TP-5000-51885.
Link, H., Keller, J., Guo, Y., and McNiff, B., 2013, “Gearbox Reliability Collaborative Phase 3 Gearbox 2 Test Plan,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO, Technical Report No. NREL/TP-5000-58190.
Oyague, F., Gorman, D., and Sheng, S., 2008, “Progressive Dynamical Drive Train Modeling as Part of NREL Gearbox Reliability Collaborative,” Windpower 2008 Conference and Exhibition, Houston, TX, June 1–4, Paper No. NREL/CP-500-43473.
Oyague, F., 2009, “Gearbox Modeling and Load Simulation of a Baseline 750 KW Wind Turbine Using State-of-the-Art Simulation Codes,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Technical Report No. NREL/TP-500-41160.
LaCava, W., Xing, Y., Guo, Y., and Moan, T., 2012, “Determining Wind Turbine Gearbox Model Complexity Using Measurement Validation and Cost Comparison,” European Wind Energy Association Annual Event, Copenhagen, Denmark, April 16–19, Paper No. NREL/CP-5000-54545.
Haastrup, M., Mouritsen, O. Ø., and Hansen, M. R., 2009, “Effect of Introducing Flexible Bodies in Multi Body Dynamics,” Proceedings of the Nordic Seminar on Computational Mechanics, Denmark, Oct. 22–23, pp. 193–196.
Haastrup, M., Hansen, M. R., and Ebbesen, M. K., 2012, “Modeling of Wind Turbine Gearbox Mounting,” Model., Identif. Control, 32(4), pp. 141–149. [CrossRef]
Haastrup, M., Hansen, R., Ebbesen, M. K., and Mouritsen, O. Ø., 2012, “Modeling and Parameter Identification of Deflections in Planetary Stage of Wind Turbine Gearbox,” Model., Identif. Control, 33(1), pp. 1–11. [CrossRef]
Marrant, B., Vanhollebeke, F., and Peeters, J., 2010, “Comparison of Multibody Simulations and Measurements of Wind Turbine Gearboxes at Hansenś 13 MW Test Facility,” Proceedings of the European Wind Energy Conference and Exhibition (EWEC), Warsaw, Poland, Apr. 20–23.
Helsen, J., Vanhollebeke, F., De Coninck, F., Vandepitte, D., and Desmet, W., 2011, “Insights in Wind Turbine Drive Train Dynamics Gathered by Validating Advanced Models on a Newly Developed 13.2 MW Dynamically Controlled Test-Rig,” Mechatronics, 21(4), pp. 737–752. [CrossRef]
Helsen, J., 2012, “The Dynamics of High Power Density Gear Units With Focus on the Wind Turbine Application,” Ph.D. thesis, KULeuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Shabana, A. A., 2013, Dynamics of Multibody Systems, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Wasfy, T. M., and Noor, A. K., 2003, “Computational Strategies for Flexible Multibody Systems,” ASME Appl. Mech. Rev., 56(6), pp. 553–613. [CrossRef]
DIN 3960, 1997, Begriffe und Bestimmungsgrößen für Stirnräder (Zylinderräder) und Stirnradpaare (Zylinderradpaare) mit Evolventenverzahnung, Beuth Verlag GMBH, Berlin.
DIN 3990-1, 1987, Tragfähigkeitsberechnung von Stirnrädern; Einführung und allgemeine Einflußfaktoren, Beuth Verlag GMBH, Berlin.
Mauer, L., 2007, “Modellierung Von Zahnradgetrieben in Der Antriebstechnik Mit Dem Mks-Programm Simpack,” Proceedings of SimPEP Kongress, Germany, Würzburg, Germany, June 14–15.
Heirman, G. H., and Desmet, W., 2010, “Interface Reduction of Flexible Bodies for Efficient Modeling of Body Flexibility in Multibody Dynamics,” Multibody Syst. Dyn., 24(2), pp. 219–234. [CrossRef]
Peeters, B., Van der Auweraer, H., Guillaume, P., and Leuridan, J., 2004, “The Polymax Frequency-Domain Method: A New Standard for Modal Parameter Estimation?,” Shock Vib., 11(3), pp. 395–409. [CrossRef]
Peeters, B., and Van der Auweraer, H., 2005, “Polymax: A Revolution in Operational Modal Analysis,” 1st International Operational Modal Analysis Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark, Apr. 26–27.
Heylen, W., and Sas, P., 2006, Modal Analysis Theory and Testing, Katholieke Universteit Leuven, Departement Werktuigkunde, Leuven, Belgium.
Kim, J., Yoon, J., and Kang, B., 2007, “Finite Element Analysis and Modeling of Structure With Bolted Joints,” Appl. Math. Model., 31(5), pp. 895–911. [CrossRef]
Montgomery, J., 2002, “Methods for Modeling Bolts in the Bolted Joint,” ANSYS User’s Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, Apr. 22–24, Vol. 5.
Di Lorenzo, E., Manzato, S., Houben, J., Vanhollebeke, F., Goris, S., and Peeters, B., 2014, “Wind Turbine Gearbox Dynamic Characterization Using Operational Modal Analysis,” Proceedings of 32nd International Modal Analysis Conference (IMAC 2014), Orlando, FL, April 8, pp. 41–52.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Sectional drawing of the wind turbine gearbox used throughout this paper

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Graphical representation of the flexible MBS model. Left: without flexible housing, right: with flexible housing.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Comparison of gear force FRFs from intermediate speed planetary gear stage to TA, vertical direction. Full line: RBE3 approach, dashed line: individual teeth.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Comparison of gear force FRFs from intermediate speed planetary gear stage to intermediate speed ring wheel, vertical direction. Full line: RBE3 approach, dashed line: individual teeth.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Graphical representation of the multilevel validation strategy

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Measurement setup for HSH + MC

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Typical FRF from TA: full gray line: measured; black dashed line: synthesized

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

TA mode shape pair. Blue: FE mesh, red: EMA measurement

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

MAC matrix for HSH + MC

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Influence of bolt pretension α on the merged nodes

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Measurement setup for assembly

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Typical FRF from assembly: full gray line: measured; black dashed line: synthesized

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Measurement setup for the HSH + MC assembly

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Measurement setup for the complete gearbox

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Measurement setup for the complete gearbox on the test rig

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In