Technical Brief

Definition of ANCF Finite Elements

[+] Author and Article Information
Ahmed A. Shabana

Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering,
University of Illinois at Chicago,
842 West Taylor Street,
Chicago, IL 60607
e-mail: shabana@uic.edu

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Design Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND NONLINEAR DYNAMICS. Manuscript received March 18, 2015; final manuscript received April 9, 2015; published online June 25, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Ahmet S. Yigit.

J. Comput. Nonlinear Dynam 10(5), 054506 (Sep 01, 2015) (5 pages) Paper No: CND-15-1069; doi: 10.1115/1.4030369 History: Received March 18, 2015; Revised April 09, 2015; Online June 25, 2015

Since the absolute nodal coordinate formulation (ANCF) was introduced, a large number of fully parametrized and gradient deficient finite elements were developed. Some of the finite elements (FE) proposed do not fall into the ANCF category, and for this reason, this technical brief describes the general requirements for ANCF finite elements. As discussed in this paper, some of the conventional isoparametric finite elements can describe arbitrary rigid body displacements and can be used with a nonincremental solution procedure. Nonetheless, these isoparametric elements, particularly the ones that employ position coordinates only, are of the C0 type and do not ensure the continuity of the position vector gradients. It is also shown that the position vector gradient continuity conditions can be described using homogeneous algebraic equations, and such conditions are different from those conditions that govern the displacement vector gradients. The use of the displacement vector gradients as nodal coordinates does not allow for an isoparametric representation that accounts for both the initial geometry and displacements using one kinematic description, can make the element assembly more difficult, and can complicate imposing linear algebraic constraint equations at a preprocessing stage. Understanding the ANCF geometric description will allow for the development of new mechanics-based computer-aided design (CAD)/analysis systems as briefly discussed in this paper.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Ding, J., Wallin, M., Wei, C., Recuero, A. M., and Shabana, A. A., 2014, “Use of Independent Rotation Field in the Large Displacement Analysis of Beams,” Nonlinear Dyn., 76(3), pp. 1829–1843. [CrossRef]
Dombrowski, S. V., 2002, “Analysis of Large Flexible Body Deformation in Multibody Systems Using Absolute Coordinates,” Multibody Syst. Dyn., 8(4), pp. 409–432. [CrossRef]
Kübler, L., Eberhard, P., and Geisler, J., 2003, “Flexible Multibody Systems With Large Deformations Using Absolute Nodal Coordinates for Isoparametric Solid Brick Elements,” ASME Paper No. DETC2003/VIB-48303. [CrossRef]
Shabana, A. A., 2012, Computational Continuum Mechanics, 2nd ed., Cambridge University, Cambridge. [CrossRef]
Betsch, P., and Stein, E., 1995, “An Assumed Strain Approach Avoiding Artificial Thickness Straining for a Non-Linear 4-Node Shell Element,” Commun. Numer. Methods Eng., 11(11), pp. 899–909. [CrossRef]
Milner, H. R., 1981, “Accurate Finite Element Analysis of Large Displacements in Skeletal Frames,” Comput. Struct., 14(3–4), pp. 205–210. [CrossRef]
Betsch, P., and Stein, E., 1996, “A Nonlinear Extensible 4-Node Shell Element Based on Continuum Theory and Assumed Strain Interpolations,” Nonlinear Sci., 6(2), pp. 169–199. [CrossRef]
Shabana, A. A., and Mikkola, A. M., 2003, “Use of the Finite Element Absolute Nodal Coordinate Formulation in Modeling Slope Discontinuity,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 125(2), pp. 342–350. [CrossRef]
Shabana, A. A., 1998, Dynamics of Multibody Systems, 2nd ed., Cambridge University, Cambridge.
Shabana, A. A., 2015, “ANCF Tire Assembly Model for Multibody System Applications,” ASME J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn., 10(2), p. 024504. [CrossRef]
Patel, M., Orzechowski, G., Tian, Q., and Shabana, A. A., “A New MBS Approach for Tire Modeling Using ANCF Finite Elements,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part K (published online). [CrossRef]
Hamed, A. M., Jayakumar, P., Letherwood, M. D., Gorsich, D. J., Recuero, A. M., and Shabana, A. A., 2015, “Ideal Compliant Joints and Integration of Computer Aided Design and Analysis,” ASME J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn., 10(2), p. 021015. [CrossRef]
Yu, Z., Liu, Y., Tinsley, B., and Shabana, A. A., 2015, “Integration of Geometry and Analysis for Vehicle System Applications: Continuum-Based Leaf Spring and Tire Assembly,” IMechE J. Multibody Dyn. (in review).


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Mechanics-based CAD/analysis models (• chassis/shackle revolute joint, ★ shackle/leaf spring revolute joint, ▲ leaf spring/axle revolute joint, and ▪ chassis/leaf spring revolute joint)




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In