0
Research Papers

Experimental and Simulation Results of a Cam and a Flat-Faced Follower Mechanism

[+] Author and Article Information
Louay S. Yousuf

Assistant Professor
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Auburn University,
Auburn, AL 36849
e-mail: lsa0006@auburn.edu

Dan B. Marghitu

Professor
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Auburn University,
Auburn, AL 36849
e-mail: marghdb@auburn.edu

Contributed by the Design Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND NONLINEAR DYNAMICS. Manuscript received May 2, 2016; final manuscript received January 14, 2017; published online September 7, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Przemyslaw Perlikowski.

J. Comput. Nonlinear Dynam 12(6), 061001 (Sep 07, 2017) (7 pages) Paper No: CND-16-1217; doi: 10.1115/1.4035824 History: Received May 02, 2016; Revised January 14, 2017

In this study, a cam and a flat-faced follower system with impacts and friction at the contact points are analyzed. The dynamic analysis has been done by simulating the follower displacement at a uniform cam angular velocity. Impact and friction are considered to determine the Lyapunov exponent based on different follower guides' clearances and cam rotational speeds. The simulation analysis has been carried out using solidworks. An experimental procedure is developed to capture the follower position through high-resolution optical markers mounted on the moving link. The experimental results are compared with the simulation results.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Cam profile specifications

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Polydyne cam profile verification

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Follower displacement of the theoretical cam profile

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Follower guide's clearance

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Single-degree-of-freedom system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

General dimensions for the cam, the follower, and the guides

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Follower linear displacement in the x and y directions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Cam-follower test rig

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Average logarithmic divergence of neighboring trajectories

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Follower linear displacement verification in the y-direction

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Average logarithmic divergence verification for the actual and the theoretical cam profile. (a) Average logarithmic divergence comparison for N = 300 rpm and (b) Average logarithmic divergence comparison for N = 600 rpm.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Follower linear motion comparison

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Average logarithmic divergence verification. (a) Average logarithmic divergence for 297 rpm and (b) Average logarithmic divergence for 350 rpm.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

LLE comparison for regular follower motion

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

LLE comparison for regular and three-degrees-of-freedom motions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Largest Lyapunov exponent for different cam rotational speeds

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In