0
Research Papers

Chaotic Behavior and Feedback Control of Magnetorheological Suspension System With Fractional-Order Derivative

[+] Author and Article Information
Chengyuan Zhang

College of Automotive Engineering,
Chongqing University,
Chongqing 401331, China
e-mail: enzozcy@cqu.edu.cn

Jian Xiao

College of Mathematics and Statistics,
Chongqing University,
Chongqing 401331, China
e-mail: xj4448@126.com

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Design Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND NONLINEAR DYNAMICS. Manuscript received June 4, 2017; final manuscript received September 7, 2017; published online November 1, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Corina Sandu.

J. Comput. Nonlinear Dynam 13(2), 021007 (Nov 01, 2017) (9 pages) Paper No: CND-17-1250; doi: 10.1115/1.4037931 History: Received June 04, 2017; Revised September 07, 2017

The fractional differential equations of the single-degree-of-freedom (DOF) quarter vehicle with a magnetorheological (MR) suspension system under the excitation of sine are established, and the numerical solution is acquired based on the predictor–corrector method. The analysis of phase trajectory, time domain response, and Poincaré section shows that the nonlinear dynamic characteristics between fractional and integer-order suspension systems are quite different, which proves the superiority of using fractional order to describe the physical properties. By discussing the influence of each parameter on the vibration, the range of parameters to avoid the chaotic vibration is obtained. The variable feedback control is used to control the chaotic vibration effectively.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2018 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Sreekar Reddy, M. B. S. , Vigneshwar, P. , Sita Ram, M. , Raja Sekhar, D. , and Sai Harish, Y. , 2017, “ Comparative Optimization Study on Vehicle Suspension Parameters for Rider Comfort Based on RSM and GA,” Mater. Today, 4(2 Part A), pp. 1794–1803. [CrossRef]
Bouazara, M. , Richard, M. J. , and Rakheja, S. , 2006, “ Safety and Comfort Analysis of a 3-D Vehicle Model With Optimal Non-Linear Active Seat Suspension,” J. Terramech., 43(2), pp. 97–118. [CrossRef]
Naik, R. D. , and Singru, P. M. , 2011, “ Resonance, Stability and Chaotic Vibration of a Quarter-Car Vehicle Model With Time-Delay Feedback,” Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 16(8), pp. 3397–3410. [CrossRef]
Fakhraei, J. , Khanlo, H. , and Dehghani, R. , 2017, “ Nonlinear Dynamic Behavior of a Heavy Articulated Vehicle With Magnetorheological Dampers,” ASME. J. Comput. Nonlinear Dynam, 12(4), p. 041017. [CrossRef]
Abtahi, S. M. , 2016, “ Chaotic Study and Chaos Control in a Half-Vehicle Model With Semi-Active Suspension Using Discrete Optimal Ott-Grebogi-Yorke Method,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part K, 231(1), pp. 148–155.
Zhang, W. , Li, J. , Zhang, K. , and Cui, P. , 2013, “ Design of Magnetic Flux Feedback Controller in Hybrid Suspension System,” Math. Prob. Eng., 2013, p. 712764.
Chen, Q. T. , Huang, Y. J. , and Song, Y. R. , 2014, “ Modeling and Analysis of High-Order MR Vibration System Based on Fractional Order,” Chin. J. Sci. Instrum., 35(12), pp. 2761–2771.
Turnip, A. , Park, S. , and Hong, K. S. , 2010, “ Sensitivity Control of a MR-Damper Semi-Active Suspension,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf., 11(2), pp. 209–218. [CrossRef]
Liem, D. T. , Truong, D. Q. , and Ahn, K. K. , 2015, “ Hysteresis Modeling of Magneto-Rheological Damper Using Self-Tuning Lyapunov-Based Fuzzy Approach,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf., 16(1), pp. 31–41. [CrossRef]
Mainardi, F. , 2010, “ Fractional Calculus and Waves in Linear Viscoelasticity,” Fractional Calculus and Waves in Linear Viscoelasticity: An Introduction to Mathematical Models, Imperial College Press, London.
Wang, Z. H. , 2011, “ Fractional Calculus: A Mathematical Tool Describing the Memory Characteristics and Intermediate Processes,” Scientific Chinese, 3, pp. 76–78.
Sun, H. L. , Jin, C. , Zhang, W. M. , Li, H. , and Tian, H. Y. , 2014, “ Modeling and Tests for a Hydro-Pneumatic Suspension Based on Fractional Calculus,” J. Vib. Shock, 33(17), pp. 167–172; 190.
Spanos, P. D. , and Evangelatos, G. I. , 2010, “ Response of a Nonlinear System With Restoring Forces Governed by Fractional Derivatives: Time Domain Simulation and Statistical Linearization Solution,” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 30(9), pp. 811–821. [CrossRef]
Machado, J. A. T. , Silva, M. F. , Barbosa, R. S. , Jesus, I. S. , Reis, C. M. , Marcos, M. G. , and Galhano, A. F. , 2010, “ Some Applications of Fractional Calculus in Engineering,” Math. Prob. Eng., 2010, p. 639801.
Scherer, R. , Kalla, S. L. , Tang, Y. , and Huang, J. , 2011, “ The Grünwald–Letnikov Method for Fractional Differential Equations,” Comput. Math. Appl., 62(3), pp. 902–917. [CrossRef]
Chen, B. S. , and Huang, Y. J. , 2009, “ Application of Fractional Calculus on the Study of Magnetorheological Fluids' Characterization,” J. Huaqiao Univ., 5, p. 003.
Atan, O. , Chen, D. , and Türk, M. , 2016, “ Fractional Order PID and Application of Its Circuit Model,” J. Chin. Inst. Eng., 39(6), pp. 695–703. [CrossRef]
Dimeas, I. , Tsirimokou, G. , Psychalinos, C. , and Elwakil, A. S. , 2017, “ Experimental Verification of Fractional-Order Filters Using a Reconfigurable Fractional-Order Impedance Emulator,” J. Circuits Syst. Comput., 26(09), p. 1750142. [CrossRef]
Kai, D. , Ford, N. J. , and Freed, A. D. , 2002, “ A Predictor-Corrector Approach for the Numerical Solution of Fractional Differential Equations,” Nonlinear Dyn., 29(1–4), pp. 3–22.
Feng, Y. L. , Wang, J. H. , Rai, Z. P. , and Zhou, Z. , 2014, “ Estimation and Correction of Fractional Calculus and Its Application,” J. Nantong Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.), 13(1), pp. 76–80.
Zhang, Q. , and Wang, B. H. , 2002, “ Chaos Control With Variable Feedback in Power System,” Electr. Power Autom, Equip., 23(11), pp. 9–12.
Petráš, I. , 2009, “ Chaos in the Fractional-Order Volta's System: Modeling and Simulation,” Nonlinear Dyn., 57(1), pp. 157–170. [CrossRef]
Shojaeefard, M. H. , Khalkhali, A. , and Safarpour Erfani, P. , 2014, “ Multi-Objective Suspension Optimization of a 5-DOF Vehicle Vibration Model Excited by Random Road Profile,” Int. J. Adv. Des. Manuf. Technol., 7(1), pp. 1–7. http://www.sid.ir/en/VEWSSID/J_pdf/1000820140101.pdf
Litak, G. , and Borowiec, M. , 2006, “ Nonlinear Vibration of a Quarter‐Car Model Excited by the Road Surface Profile,” Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 13(7), pp. 1373–1383. [CrossRef]
Houfek, M. , Sveda, P. , and Kratochvíl, C. , 2011, “ Identification of Deterministic Chaos in Dynamical Systems,” Mechatronics, Springer, Berlin. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Single DOF quarter-car suspension model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

x−ω bifurcation diagram of the suspension system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Time domain response, phase trajectory, Poincaré section, and Lyapunov exponents of the integer-order differential suspension system: (a) time domain response, (b) phase trajectory, (c) Poincaré section, and (d) Lyapunov exponents

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Bifurcation diagram of the suspension system: (a) x–q chaotic bifurcation diagram of suspension system and (b) Dqx–q chaotic bifurcation diagram of suspension system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

The phase trajectory, time domain response, and Poincaré section of MR suspension under different fractional orders (=0.600,0.974, 0.976, 0.990, 0.997,1.000): (a) phase trajectory q = 0.60, (b) time domain response q = 0.60, (c) Poincaré section q = 0.60, (d) phase trajectory q = 0.974, (e) time domain response q = 0.974, (f) Poincaré section q = 0.974, (g) phase trajectory q = 0.976, (h) time domain response q = 0.976, (i) Poincaré section q = 0.976, (j) phase trajectory q = 0.990, (k) time domain response q = 0.990, (l), (m) phase trajectory q = 0.997, (n) time domain response q = 0.997, (o) Poincaré section q = 0.997, (p) phase trajectory q = 1.000, (q) time domain response q = 1.000, and (r) Poincaré section q = 1.000

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

x−k1 bifurcation diagram of the suspension system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

x−k2 bifurcation diagram of the suspension system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

x−c1 bifurcation diagram of the suspension system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

x−c2 bifurcation diagram of the suspension system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Chaos control based on system parameter adjustment: (a) phase trajectory (controlled), (b) time domain response (controlled), and (c) Poincare section (controlled)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Chaos control based on variable feedback: (a) phase trajectory controlled, (b) time domain response controlled, and (c) Poincare section controlled

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In