Research Papers

Modeling and Analysis of an Offshore Wind Turbine With Fluid Power Transmission for Centralized Electricity Generation

[+] Author and Article Information
Antonio Jarquin Laguna

Offshore Engineering Section,
Delft University of Technology,
Delft 2628CN, The Netherlands
e-mail: A.JarquinLaguna@tudelft.nl

Contributed by the Design Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND NONLINEAR DYNAMICS. Manuscript received October 30, 2013; final manuscript received July 25, 2014; published online April 2, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Carlo L. Bottasso.

J. Comput. Nonlinear Dynam 10(4), 041002 (Jul 01, 2015) (14 pages) Paper No: CND-13-1263; doi: 10.1115/1.4028110 History: Received October 30, 2013; Revised July 25, 2014; Online April 02, 2015

This paper presents a mathematical model of an innovative offshore wind turbine with fluid power transmission. The proposed concept is a variable-speed, pitch controlled turbine which differs from conventional technology by using fluid power technology as a medium to transfer the energy from the wind. The final aim is to use several turbines to centralize electricity generation. Unlike conventional variable speed concepts, the proposed turbine comprises a passive-torque control method which allows the turbine to operate at optimal aerodynamic performance for different wind speeds. A numerical model of a single turbine is developed and time-domain simulations are used to analyze the dynamic response of the different operational parameters to a turbulent wind speed input. The results are compared with those of a reference offshore wind turbine with similar characteristics. It is shown that operation below rated wind speed with a passive control is possible for a single turbine with a better dynamic performance than the reference in terms of transmission torque. However, the efficiency of the energy transmission is reduced throughout the operational range. The addition and simulation of more turbines to the hydraulic network is necessary to determine to which extent the benefits of a centralized wind farm compensate for the relatively lower efficiency.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Spinato, F., Tavner, P., Bussel, G. V., and Koutoulakos, E., 2009, “Reliability of Wind Turbine Subassemblies,” IET Renewable Power Gener., 3(4), pp. 387–401. [CrossRef]
Liserre, M., Cardenas, R., Molinas, M., and Rodriguez, J., 2011, “Overview of Multi-MW Wind Turbines and Wind Parks,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 58(4), pp. 1081–1095. [CrossRef]
Parker, M., and Anaya-Lara, O., 2013, “Cost and Losses Associated With Offshore Wind Farm Collection Networks Which Centralise the Turbine Power Electronic Converters,” IET Renewable Power Gener., 7(4), pp. 390–400. [CrossRef]
Diepeveen, N., 2013, “On Fluid Power Transmission for Offshore Wind Turbines,” Ph.D. thesis, Technical University of Delft, Delft, The Netherlands.
Jonkman, J., Butterfield, S., Musial, W., and Scott, G., 2009, “Definition of a 5 MW Reference Wind Turbine for Offshore System Development,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, Technical Report No. NREL/TP-500-38060.
Larsen, T., and Hansen, A., 2007, “How to HAWC2, the Users Manual,” Risoe National Laboratory, Technical University of Denmark, Denmark, Technical Report No. Riso-R-1597(en).
Bossanyi, E., 2010, “Bladed User Manual,” Garrad Hassan and Partners Ltd., Bristol, UK.
Jarquin-Laguna, A., and Diepeveen, N., 2013, “Dynamic Analysis of Fluid Power Drive-Trains for Variable Speed Wind Turbines: A Parameter Study,” Scientific Proceedings of the European Academy of Wind Energy, EWEA 2013, pp. 11–16.
Chen, Z., Guerrero, J., and Blaabjerg, F., 2009, “A Review of the State of the Art of Power Electronics for Wind Turbines,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., 24(8), pp. 1859–1875. [CrossRef]
Angehm, R., 2000, “Safety Engineering for the 423 MW-Pelton Runners at Bieudron,” 20th IAHR Symposium, VATECH HYDRO.
Whittaker, T., and Folley, M., 2012, “Nearshore Oscillating Wave Surge Converters and the Development of Oyster,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc., A, 370(1959), pp. 345–364. [CrossRef]
Bianchi, F., Battista, H., and Mantz, R., 1997, Wind Turbine Control Systems: Principles, Modelling and Gain Scheduling Design (Advances in Industrial Control), 1st ed., Vol. 1, A.Editor, ed., Springer, London, pp. 1–3.
Merrit, H., 1967, Hydraulic Control Systems, Wiley, New York.
Makinen, J., Piche, R., and Ellman, A., 2000, “Fluid Transmission Line Modeling Using a Variational Method,” ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control, 122(1), pp. 153–162. [CrossRef]
Yang, W., and Tobler, W., 1991, “Dissipative Modal Approximation of Fluid Transmission Lines Using Linear Friction Model,” ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control, 113(1), pp. 152–162. [CrossRef]
Makinen, J., Pertola, P., and Marjamaki, H., 2010, “Modeling Coupled Hydraulic-Driven Multibody Systems Using Finite Element Method,” 1st Joint International Conference on Multibody System Dynamics, Lappeenranta University of Technology.
Thake, J., 2000, The Micro-hydro Pelton Turbine Manual, ITDG Publishing, London.
Zhang, Z., 2007, “Flow Interactions in Pelton Turbines and the Hydraulic Efficiency of the Turbine System,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part A, 221(3), pp. 343–357. [CrossRef]
Diepeveen, N., and Jarquin-Laguna, A., 2012, “Wind Tunnel Experiments to Prove a Hydraulic Passive Torque Control Concept for Variable Speed Wind Turbines,” Science of Making Torque from Wind, The European Academy of Wind Energy, EAWE 2012.
Grunnet, J., Soltani, M., Knudsen, T., Kragelund, M., and Bak, T., 2010, “Aeolus Toolbox for Dynamics Wind Farm Model, Simulation and Control,” European Wind Energy Conference and Exhibition, The European Academy of Wind Energy, EWEC 2010, pp. 3119–3129.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic diagram of a single DOT

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Subsystem block diagram of the wind turbine with fluid power transmission

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Diagram of a Pelton wheel

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Simplified diagram of flow in a Pelton

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Torque-speed curve for passive control strategy

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Simplified schematic for top: gearbox concept; bottom: hydraulic concept

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Wind gust of 4 m/s in 10.5 s according to International Electromechanical Commission (IEC) standards, mean wind speed is 8 m/s

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Transient response to a 4 m/s wind gust starting at t = 30 s

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Hub height wind speed of 8 m/s with 17.67% TI

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Transient response operation below rated wind speed

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

Power curves for the different concepts

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 20

Steady-state efficiency for the different concepts

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Generator platform operation below rated wind speed

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Performance comparison below rated wind speed

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Transient response operation above rated wind speed

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Generator platform operation above rated wind speed

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Performance comparison above rated wind speed

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Distributed parameters pipeline representation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Torque- and power-speed curves for the different concepts

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Hub height wind speed of 15 m/s with 12% TI



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In