Research Papers

Generalized Component Mode Synthesis for the Spatial Motion of Flexible Bodies With Large Rotations About One Axis1

[+] Author and Article Information
Pascal Ziegler

Institute of Engineering and
Computational Mechanics,
University of Stuttgart,
Stuttgart 70569, Germany
e-mail: pascal.ziegler@itm.uni-stuttgart.de

Alexander Humer

Institute of Technical Mechanics,
Johannes Kepler University Linz,
Linz 4040, Austria
e-mail: alexander.humer@jku.at

Astrid Pechstein

Institute of Technical Mechanics,
Johannes Kepler University Linz,
Linz 4040, Austria
e-mail: astrid.pechstein@jku.at

Johannes Gerstmayr

Institute of Mechatronics,
University of Innsbruck,
Innsbruck 6020, Austria
e-mail: johannes.gerstmayr@uibk.ac.at

Contributed by the Design Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND NONLINEAR DYNAMICS. Manuscript received May 28, 2015; final manuscript received November 26, 2015; published online May 12, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Paramsothy Jayakumar.

J. Comput. Nonlinear Dynam 11(4), 041018 (May 12, 2016) (10 pages) Paper No: CND-15-1145; doi: 10.1115/1.4032160 History: Received May 28, 2015; Revised November 26, 2015

In industrial practice, the floating frame of reference formulation (FFRF)—often combined with the component mode synthesis (CMS) in order to reduce the number of flexible degrees-of-freedom—is the common approach to describe arbitrarily shaped bodies in flexible multibody systems. Owed to the relative formulation of the flexible deformation with respect to the reference frame, the equations of motion show state-dependent nonconstant inertia terms. Such relative description, however, comes along with considerable numerical costs, since both the mass matrix and gyroscopic forces, i.e., the quadratic velocity vector, need to be evaluated in every integration step. The state dependency of the inertia terms can be avoided by employing an alternative formulation based on the mode shapes as in the classical CMS approach. In this approach, which is referred to as generalized component mode synthesis (GCMS), the total (absolute) displacements are approximated directly. Consequently, the mass matrix is constant, no quadratic velocity vector appears, and the stiffness matrix is a corotated but otherwise constant matrix. In order to represent the same flexible deformation as in the classical FFRF-based CMS, however, a comparatively large number of degrees-of-freedom is required. The approach described in the present paper makes use of the fact that a majority of components in technical systems are constrained to motions showing large rotations only about a single spatially fixed axis. For this reason, the GCMS is adapted for multibody systems that are subjected to small flexible deformations and undergo a rigid body motion showing large translations, large rotations about one axis, but small rotations otherwise. Thereby, the number of shape functions representing the flexible deformation is reduced, which further increases numerical efficiency compared to the original GCMS formulation for arbitrary rotations.

Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Shabana, A. , 2013, Dynamics of Multibody Systems, 3rd ed., Cambridge University Press, New York.
Craig, R. , and Bampton, M. , 1968, “ Coupling of Substructures for Dynamic Analyses,” AIAA J., 6(7), pp. 1313–1319. [CrossRef]
Felippa, C. , and Haugen, B. , 2005, “ A Unified Formulation of Small-Strain Corotational Finite Elements: I. Theory,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 194(21), pp. 2285–2335. [CrossRef]
Gerstmayr, J. , and Schöberl, J. , 2006, “ A 3D Finite Element Method for Flexible Multibody Systems,” Multibody Syst. Dyn., 15(4), pp. 309–324. [CrossRef]
Gerstmayr, J. , and Ambrósio, J. , 2008, “ Component Mode Synthesis With Constant Mass and Stiffness Matrices Applied to Flexible Multibody Systems,” Int. J. Numer. Eng., 73(11), pp. 1518–1546. [CrossRef]
Pechstein, A. , Reischl, D. , and Gerstmayr, J. , 2011, “ A Generalized Component Mode Synthesis Approach Leading to Constant Mass and Stiffness Matrices,” ASME Paper No. DETC2011-47826.
Pechstein, A. , Reischl, D. , and Gerstmayr, J. , 2013, “ A Generalized Component Mode Synthesis Approach for Flexible Multibody Systems With a Constant Mass Matrix,” ASME J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn., 8(1), p. 011019. [CrossRef]
Humer, A. , and Gerstmayr, J. , 2013, “ Energy–Momentum Conserving Time Integration of Modally Reduced Flexible Multibody Systems,” ASME Paper No. DETC2013-13173.
Brüls, O. , Duysinx, P. , and Golinval, J.-C. , 2007, “ The Global Modal Parameterization for Non-Linear Model-Order Reduction in Flexible Multibody Dynamics,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 69(5), pp. 948–977. [CrossRef]
Naets, F. , Heirman, G. , and Desmet, W. , 2012, “ Subsystem Global Modal Parameterization for Efficient Simulation of Flexible Multibody Systems,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 89(10), pp. 1227–1248. [CrossRef]
Humer, A. , Naets, F. , Desmet, W. , and Gerstmayr, J. , 2014, “ A Generalized Component Mode Synthesis Approach for Global Modal Parameterization in Flexible Multibody Dynamics,” 3rd Joint International Conference on Multibody System Dynamics (IMSD 2014).
Gerstmayr, J. , 2003, “ Strain Tensors in the Absolute Nodal Coordinate and the Floating Frame of Reference Formulation,” Nonlinear Dyn., 34(1–2), pp. 133–145. [CrossRef]
Gerstmayr, J. , Dorninger, A. , Eder, R. , Gruber, P. , Reischl, D. , Saxinger, M. , Schörgenhumer, M. , Humer, A. , Nachbagauer, K. , Pechstein, A. , and Vetyukov, Y. , 2013, “ HOTINT—A Script Language Based Framework for the Simulation of Multibody Dynamics Systems,” ASME Paper No. DETC2013-12299.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Decomposition of the total deformation into rigid body motion and flexible displacement

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

One-cylinder piston engine with three flexible components

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Convergence of the deflection of the connecting rod for different time step sizes and number of modes

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Angular velocity of the crankshaft during run-up

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Deflection in the middle of the connecting rod during run-up



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In