Several important issues relevant to modeling of flexible-link robotic manipulators are addressed in this paper. First, we examine the question of which inertial nonlinearities should be included in the equations of motion for purposes of simulation. A complete model incorporating all inertial terms that couple rigid-body and elastic motions is presented along with a rational scheme for classifying them. Second, the issue of geometric nonlinearities is discussed. These are terms whose origin is the geometrically nonlinear theory of elasticity, as well as the terms arising from the interbody coupling due to the elastic deformation at the link tip. Accordingly, a general way of incorporating the well-known geometric stiffening effect is presented along with several schemes for treating the elastic kinematics at the joint interconnections. In addition, the question of basis function selection for spatial discretization of the elastic displacements is also addressed. The finite element method and an eigenfunction expansion techniques are presented and compared. All issues are examined numerically in the context of a simple beam example and the Space Shuttle Remote Manipulator System. Unlike a single-link system, the results for the latter show that all terms are required for accurate simulation of faster maneuvers. Hence, the conclusions of the paper are contrary to some of the previous findings on the validity of various models for dynamics simulation of flexible-body systems.

1.
Gaultier, P.E. and Cleghorn, W.L. “Modeling of Flexible Manipulator Dynamics,” 1st National Applied Mechanisms and Robotics Conference, Cincinnati, OH, I, AMR-2C-3, Nov. 1989.
2.
Bae
D. S.
, and
Haug
E. J.
A Recursive Formulation for Constrained Mechanical System, Part I—Open Loop
,”
Mechanics of Structures and Machines
, Vol.
15, 3
,
1987
, pp.
359
382
.
3.
Serna, M.A., and Bayo, E. “A Modified Lagrangian Formulation for Elastic Robots,” Proc. 2nd International Symposium on Robotics and Manufacturing: Research, Education, and Applications, New Mexico, 1987, pp. 513–520.
4.
Naganathan
G.
, and
Soni
A. H.
, “
Nonlinear Modeling of Kinematic and Flexibility Effects in Manipulator Design
,”
ASME J. of Mechanisms, Transmissions, and Automation in Design
,
110
, Sept.
1988
, pp.
243
254
.
5.
Wehage, R.A., and Shabana, A.A. “Application of Generalized Newton-Euler Equations and Recursive Projection Methods to Dynamics of Deformable Multibody Systems,” Proc. 1989 ASME Design Technical Conferences—15th Design Automation Conference, Montreal, Vol. 19-3, Sept. 1989, pp. 17–25.
6.
Hughes
P. C.
, and
Sincarsin
G. B.
, “
Dynamics of Elastic Multibody Chains: Part B—Global Dynamics
,”
Dynamics and Stability of Systems
, Vol.
4, 3 and 4
,
1989
, pp.
227
243
.
7.
Nagarajan
S.
and
Turcic
D. A.
, “
Lagrangian Formulation of the Equations of Motion for Elastic Mechanisms With Mutual Dependence Between Rigid Body and Elastic Motions. Part II: System Equations
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENT, AND CONTROL
, Vol.
112
, June
1990
, pp.
215
224
.
8.
D’Eleuterio
G. M. T.
, “
Dynamics of Elastic Multibody Chains: Part C—Recursive Dynamics
,”
Dynamics and Stability of Systems
, Vol.
7, 2
,
1992
, pp.
61
90
.
9.
Kane
T. R.
,
Ryan
R. R.
, and
Banerjee
A. K.
Dynamics of a Cantilever Beam Attached to a Moving Base
,”
J. Guidance, Control, and Dynamics
, Vol.
10, 2
,
1987
, pp.
139
151
.
10.
Simo
J. C.
, and
Vu-Quoc
L.
, “
The Role of Non-linear Theories in Transient Dynamic Analysis of Flexible Structures
,”
ASME Journal of Sound and Vibration
, Vol.
119, 3
,
1987
, pp.
487
508
.
11.
Simo
J. C.
, and
Vu-Quoc
L.
On the Dynamics of Flexible Beams under Large Overall Motions—The Plane Case: Part I
,”
ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics
, Vol.
53, 4
,
1986
, pp.
849
854
.
12.
Likins
P. W.
,
Barbera
F. J.
, and
Baddeley
V.
, “
Mathematical Modeling of Spinning Elastic Bodies for Modal Analysis
,”
AIAA Journal
, Vol.
11
,
1973
, pp.
1251
1258
.
13.
Vigneron
F. R.
, “
Comment on ’Mathematical Modeling of Spinning Elastic Bodies for Modal Analysis’
,”
AIAA Journal
, Vol.
13
,
1975
, pp.
126
127
.
14.
Kaza
K. R.
, and
Kvaternik
R. G.
Nonlinear Flap-Lag-Axial Equations of a Rotating Beam
,”
Acta Astronautica
, Vol.
15, 6
,
1977
, pp.
1349
1360
.
15.
Lips
K. W.
, and
Modi
V. J.
, “
General Dynamics of a Large Class of Flexible Satellite Systems
,”
Acta Astronautica
, Vol.
7
,
1980
, pp.
1349
1360
.
16.
Hughes
P. C.
, and
Fung
J. C.
Lyapunov Stability of Spinning Satellites with Long Flexible Appendages
,”
J. of Celestial Mechanics
, Vol.
4
,
1971
, pp.
295
308
.
17.
Vu-Quoc
L.
, and
Simo
J. C.
Dynamics of Earth-Orbiting Flexible Satellites with Multibody Component
,”
J. Guidance, Control, and Dynamics
, Vol.
10, 6
,
1987
, pp.
549
558
.
18.
Banerjee
A. K.
, and
Lemak
J. M.
Multi-Flexible Body Dynamics Capturing Motion-Induced Stiffness
,”
ASME Journal Applied Mechanics
, Vol.
58
,
1991
, pp.
766
775
.
19.
Walrapp
O.
, “
Linearized Flexible Multibody Dynamics Including Geometric Stiffening Effects
,”
Mechanics of Structures and Machines
, Vol.
19, 3
,
1991
, pp.
385
409
.
20.
Padilla
C. E.
, and
von Flotow
A. H.
, “
Nonlinear Strain-Displacement Relations and Flexible Multibody Dynamics
,”
J. Guidance, Control, and Dynamics
, Vol.
15, 1
,
1992
, pp.
128
136
.
21.
Ider
S. K.
, and
Amirouche
F. M. L.
, “
Nonlinear Modeling of Flexible Multibody Systems Dynamics Subjected to Variable Constraints
,”
ASME Journal Applied Mechanics
, Vol.
56
,
1989
, pp.
444
450
.
22.
Van Woerkom, P.Th.L.M., “Modified Dynamics Modelling for Maneuvering Flexible Space Manipulators,” 42nd Congress of the International Astronautical Federation, IAF-91-356, Oct. 1991, Montreal.
23.
Shabana
A. A.
, “
Constrained Motion of Deformable Bodies
,”
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering
, Vol.
32
,
1991
. pp.
1813
1831
.
24.
Sharf, I., and Damaren, C. J., “Simulation of Flexible-Link Manipulators: Basis Functions and Nonlinear Terms in the Motion Equations,” Proc. 1992 IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation, Nice, France, May, 1992, pp. 1956–1962.
25.
Mayo, J., and Dominguez, J., “Geometrically Nonlinear Coupling Between Axial and Flexural Modes of Deformation of Multibody Systems,” Proc. 1992 ASME Winter Annual Meeting, AMD-Vol. 141/DSC-Vol. 37, Anaheim, CA, 1992, pp. 95–106.
26.
Meirovitch
L.
, “
Hybrid State Equations of Motion for Flexible Bodies in Terms of Quasi-Coordinates
,”
J. Guidance, Control, and Dynamics
, Vol.
14, 5
,
1991
, pp.
1008
1013
.
27.
Simo
J. C.
, and
Vu-Quoc
L.
, “
On the Dynamics in Space of Rods Undergoing Large Motions—A Geometrically Exact Approach
,”
Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
, Vol.
66
,
1988
, pp.
125
161
.
28.
Cardona
A.
, and
Geradin
M.
, “
A Beam Finite Element Non-linear Theory with Finite Rotations
,”
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering
, Vol.
26
,
1988
, pp.
2406
2438
.
29.
D’Eleuterio, G.M.T., “Notes on Nonlinearities in Flexible-Body Motion Equations,” 1987.
30.
Sincarsin
G. B.
, and
Hughes
P. C.
, “
Dynamics of Elastic Multibody Chains: Part A—Body Motion Equations
,”
Dynamics and Stability of Systems
, Vol.
4, 3 and 4
,
1990
, pp.
209
226
.
31.
Spencer, A.J.M., Continuum Mechanics, Longman, London, 1980.
32.
D’Eleuterio, G. M. T., “Multibody Dynamics for Space Station Manipulators: Recursive Dynamics of Topological Chains,” Dynacon Report SS-3, 1985.
33.
Simo
J. C.
, and
Vu-Quoc
L.
, “
On the Dynamics of Flexible Beams under Large Overall Motions—The Plane Case: Part II
,”
ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics
, Vol.
53, 4
,
1986
, pp.
855
863
.
34.
Damaren, C.J. and D’Eleuterio, G.M.T. “On the Relationship Between Discrete-Time Optimal Control and Elastic Multibody Dynamics” Contemporary Mathematics: Dynamics and Control of Multibody Systems, Vol. 97, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1989.
35.
Inman, D. J., Vibration with Control, Measurement, and Stability, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1989.
36.
Wu, H. T., Mani, N. K., and Ashrafioun, H. “Modeling of Flexible Bodies for Dynamic Analysis of Mechanical Systems,” Proc. of the 1st National Applied Mechanisms and Robotics Conference, Cincinnati, OH, Nov. 1989.
37.
Przemieniecki, J. S., Theory of Matrix Structural Analysis, McGraw-Hill New York, 1968.
38.
Hanagud
S.
, and
Sarkar
S.
Problem of the Dynamics of a Cantilevered Beam Attached to a Moving Base
,”
J. Guidance, Control, and Dynamics
, Vol.
12, 3
,
1989
, pp.
438
441
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.