We present a new technique for multi-axis force/torque sensor calibration called shape from motion. The novel aspect of this technique is that it does not require explicit knowledge of the redundant applied load vectors, yet it retains the noise rejection of a highly redundant data set and the rigor of least squares. The result is a much faster, slightly more accurate calibration procedure. A constant-magnitude force (produced by a mass in a gravity field) is randomly moved through the sensing space while raw data is continuously gathered. Using only the raw sensor signals, the motion of the force vector (the “motion”) and the calibration matrix (the “shape”) are simultaneously extracted by singular value decomposition. We have applied this technique to several types of force/torque sensors and present experimental results for a 2-DOF fingertip and a 6-DOF wrist sensor with comparisons to the standard least squares approach.

1.
Bayo
E.
and
Stubbe
J. R.
,
1989
, “
Six-Axis Force Sensor Evaluation and a New Type of Optimal frame Truss Design for Robotic Applications
,”
Journal of Robotic Systems
, v.
6
, n.
2
, pp.
191
208
.
2.
Beaton
A. E.
,
Rubin
D. B.
, and
Barone
J. L.
,
1976
, “
The Acceptability of Regression Solutions; Another Look at Computational Accuracy
,”
Journal of the American Statistical Association
, v.
71
, pp.
158
168
.
3.
Bicchi, A. and P. Dario, 1988, “Intrinsic Tactile Sensing for Artificial Hands,” Robotics Research: The 4th International Symposium, R. C. Bolles and B. Roth, editors, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 83–90.
4.
Chatterjee, S. and A. S. Hadi, 1988, Sensitivity Analysis in Linear Regression, Wiley, New York, NY.
5.
Diamond, W., 1981, Practical Experiment Designs for Engineers and Scientists, Lifetime learning Pub., Belmont, CA.
6.
Forsythe, G. E., M. Malcolm, and C. B. Moler, 1977, Computer Methods for Mathematical Computations, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
7.
Klema
V. C.
, and
Laub
A. J.
,
1980
, “
The Singular Value Decomposition: Its Computation and Some Applications
,”
IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control
, v.
25
, n.
2
, pp.
164
176
.
8.
Lord Corporation, 1986, Installation and Operations Manual for F/T Series Force/Torque Sensing Systems, Lord Corporation, Cary, NC, Appendix A.
9.
Nakamura, Y., T. Yoshikawa, and I. Futamata, 1988, “Design and Signal Processing of Six-Axis Force Sensors,” Robotics Research: The 4th International Symposium, R. C. Bolles and B. Roth, editors, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 75–81.
10.
Shimano, B. and Roth, B., 1977, “On Force Sensing Information and its Use in Controlling Manipulators,” Proceedings of the IFAC International Symposium on information-Control Problems in Manufacturing Technology, pp. 119–126.
11.
Strang, G., 1988, Linear Algebra and Its Applications, third edition, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Publishers, San Diego, CA, appendix A.
12.
Tomasi, C. and T. Kanade, 1991, “Shape and Motion from Image Streams: a Factorization Method” Tech. Report CMU-CS-91-172, Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
13.
Uchiyama
M.
,
Bayo
E.
, and
Palma-Villalon
E.
,
1991
, “
A Systematic Design Procedure to Minimize a Performance Index for Robot Force Sensors
,”
ASME Journal Of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, And Control
, v.
113
, n.
3
, pp.
388
394
.
14.
Voyles, R. M., and P. K. Khosla, 1997, “Collaborative Calibration: Extending Shape from Motion Calibration,” Proc. of IEEE International Conf on Robotics and Automation, Albuquerque, NM.
15.
Voyles, R. M., J. D. Morrow, and P. K. Khosla, 1995, “Shape from Motion Decomposition as a Learning Approach for Autonomous Agents,” Proceedings of the IEEE/SICE/RSJ Multisensor Fusion and International Conf. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, v. 1, pp. 407–412.
16.
Voyles, R. M., J. D. Morrow, and P. K. Khosla, 1996, “Including Sensor Bias in Shape from Motion Calibration and Sensor Fusion,” to appear in Proc. of the IEEE Multisensor Fusion and Integration Conf., Washington, D.C., pp. 93–99.
17.
Watson, P. C., and S. H. Drake, 1975, “Pedestal and Wrist Force Sensors for Automatic Assembly,” Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Industrial Robots, pp. 501–511.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.