The sensitivity of energy management strategies (EMS) with respect to variations in drive cycle and system parameters is considered. The design of three strategies is presented: rule-based, stochastic dynamic programming (SDP), and model predictive control (MPC). Each strategy is applied to a series hydraulic hybrid powertrain and validated experimentally using a hardware-in-the-loop system. A full factorial design of experiments (DOE) is conducted to evaluate the performance of these controllers under different urban and highway drive cycles as well as with enforced modeling errors. Through this study, it is observed that each EMS design method represents a different level of tradeoff between optimality and robustness based on how much knowledge of the system is assumed. This tradeoff is quantified by analyzing the standard deviation of system specific fuel consumption (SSFC) and root mean square (RMS) tracking error over the different simulation cases. This insight can then be used to motivate the choice of which control strategy to use based on the application. For example, a city bus travels a repeated route and that knowledge can be leveraged in the EMS design to improve performance. Through this study, it is demonstrated that there is not one EMS design method which is best suited for all applications but rather the underlying assumptions of the system and drive cycle must be carefully considered so that the most appropriate design method is chosen.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
April 2015
Research-Article
Comparative Study of Energy Management Strategies for Hydraulic Hybrids
Timothy O. Deppen,
Timothy O. Deppen
Department of Mechanical Science
and Engineering,
1206 West Green Street,
e-mail: tdeppen@illinois.edu
and Engineering,
University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign
,1206 West Green Street,
Urbana, IL 61801
e-mail: tdeppen@illinois.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Andrew G. Alleyne,
Andrew G. Alleyne
Department of Mechanical Science
and Engineering,
1206 West Green Street,
e-mail: alleyne@illinois.edu
and Engineering,
University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign
,1206 West Green Street,
Urbana, IL 61801
e-mail: alleyne@illinois.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Jonathan J. Meyer,
Jonathan J. Meyer
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
e-mail: meyerjo@me.umn.edu
University of Minnesota-Twin Cities
,Minneapolis, MN 55455
e-mail: meyerjo@me.umn.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Kim A. Stelson
Kim A. Stelson
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
e-mail: kstelson@me.umn.edu
University of Minnesota-Twin Cities
,Minneapolis, MN 55455
e-mail: kstelson@me.umn.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Timothy O. Deppen
Department of Mechanical Science
and Engineering,
1206 West Green Street,
e-mail: tdeppen@illinois.edu
and Engineering,
University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign
,1206 West Green Street,
Urbana, IL 61801
e-mail: tdeppen@illinois.edu
Andrew G. Alleyne
Department of Mechanical Science
and Engineering,
1206 West Green Street,
e-mail: alleyne@illinois.edu
and Engineering,
University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign
,1206 West Green Street,
Urbana, IL 61801
e-mail: alleyne@illinois.edu
Jonathan J. Meyer
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
e-mail: meyerjo@me.umn.edu
University of Minnesota-Twin Cities
,Minneapolis, MN 55455
e-mail: meyerjo@me.umn.edu
Kim A. Stelson
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
e-mail: kstelson@me.umn.edu
University of Minnesota-Twin Cities
,Minneapolis, MN 55455
e-mail: kstelson@me.umn.edu
Contributed by the Dynamic Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENT, AND CONTROL. Manuscript received December 17, 2012; final manuscript received September 5, 2014; published online November 7, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Nariman Sepehri.
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control. Apr 2015, 137(4): 041002 (11 pages)
Published Online: April 1, 2015
Article history
Received:
December 17, 2012
Revision Received:
September 5, 2014
Citation
Deppen, T. O., Alleyne, A. G., Meyer, J. J., and Stelson, K. A. (April 1, 2015). "Comparative Study of Energy Management Strategies for Hydraulic Hybrids." ASME. J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control. April 2015; 137(4): 041002. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4028525
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
Regret Analysis of Shrinking Horizon Model Predictive Control
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control (March 2025)
Control-Oriented Modeling of a Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Affected by Redox Cycling Using a Novel Deep Learning Approach
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control (March 2025)
Robust Control of Exo-Abs, a Wearable Platform for Ubiquitous Respiratory Assistance
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control (March 2025)
Resilient Self-Triggered Model Predictive Control of Cyber-Physical Systems Under Two-Channel False Data Injection Attacks
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control (March 2025)
Related Articles
Enery management in Mobile Hydraulics
Mechanical Engineering (June,2013)
Hybrid Computer-Aided Design of a Hydrostatic Vehicle Drive With Energy Accumulator
J. Mech. Des (January,1982)
A Comparative Analysis of Energy Management Strategies for Hybrid Electric Vehicles
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control (May,2011)
Robustification Through Minimax Dynamic Programing and Its Implication for Hybrid Vehicle Energy Management Strategies
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control (September,2021)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Engine Gas Exchange Controlled by Digital Hydraulics
International Conference on Measurement and Control Engineering 2nd (ICMCE 2011)
QRAS Approach to Phased Mission Analysis (PSAM-0444)
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM)
Application of Traffic Simulation to Transverse Section Types Selection of Urban Expressway
International Conference on Computer Technology and Development, 3rd (ICCTD 2011)