Previous works have demonstrated that the distributed reaction regime improved the reformate product distribution, prevented soot formation, and favored higher hydrogen yields. The experimental data from these works and additional literature focusing on individual reactions provided an insight into how the distributed reaction regime influenced the reformate product composition. The distributed reaction regime was achieved through the controlled entrainment of hot reactive products (containing heat, carbon dioxide, steam and reactive radicals and species) into the premixed fuel air mixture, elongating the chemical time and length scales. High velocity jets enhanced mixing, while shortening the time and length scales associated with transport. As some steam and carbon dioxide will form in the reforming process, it was theorized that the mixing of the entrained flow (containing heat, carbon dioxide, and steam) into the premixed fuel air mixture promoted dry and steam reforming reactions, improving conversion. The available information on chemical kinetics of reformation is rather limited. In this work, the activity and timescales of these reactions were determined from the available experimental data. This was then used to assess which reactions were active under Distributed Reforming conditions. These data help in the design and development of advanced reformers using distributed reforming conditions.

## Introduction

The distributed reaction regime explored previously has been shown to alter the distribution of reformate products, yielding more favorable results [14]. From these studies, a theory was formulated on how the distributed reaction regime influenced the reformate product composition and is reported within this paper.

Accurate kinetic modeling of reforming is still a topic of continuous development since it cannot capture the full range of reactions [58]. Most detailed kinetic combustion mechanisms are capable of predicting partial oxidation conditions, but do not have the capability to accurately represent noncatalytic steam reforming and soot formation reactions [8]. This limits the mechanism's accuracy to predict the effects of the distributed reaction regime. Jess [7] has shown significant interaction of the steam with soot and lighter (C1–C2) alkane molecules. However, a comprehensive model that includes both dry and steam reforming reactions for heavy alkane fuels has not been developed. Previous examination [5,9] by our group has successfully modeled only partial oxidation under conventional reforming conditions. These efforts have partially attempted to model distributed reforming condition using detailed combustion mechanism in a one-dimensional plug flow reactor with recirculation [2].

However, as the distributed reaction regime uses turbulent flow to control the chemistry through the entrainment of exhaust products, three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations can potentially offer a more accurate approach to modeling the distributed reaction regime than one-dimensional plug flow reactor with recirculation [10]. CFD is possible for simpler fuels such as methane or carbon [1012]. However, detailed mechanisms [1315] of a heavy hydrocarbon fuel capable of capturing reforming behavior were computationally too large for conventional CFD approaches. A reduced mechanism could be developed on steam and dry reforming kinetics provided sufficient experimental data were made available. In this paper, the activities of the reactions were determined through further analysis of the rather limited experimental data.

## Activity of Reforming Reactions

In noncatalytic reforming, five dominant reactions occur: partial oxidation, steam reforming, dry reforming, pyrolysis, and the water gas shift reactions. As kinetic mechanisms for JP8 or a suitable surrogate have only been developed for partial oxidation and pyrolysis conditions, experimental data from literature were assessed to determine the conditions that would support these reactions. Table 1 summarizes the temperatures and timescales, which activate these reactions. Sections 2.12.5 discuss this information in further detail. Significant literature is available on pyrolysis and partial oxidation reactions. However, limited research has been conducted in noncatalytic steam and dry reforming of hydrocarbons fuels such as JP8. Most information on noncatalytic steam and dry reforming reactions were derived from the experimental results of blank reactors used in catalyst evaluation and the gasification of biomass and wastes. Steam and dry reforming reactions were considered the most desirable, as they contributed the highest yields of syngas, and converted nonusable (H2O and CO2) gas phase species to favorable syngas (H2 and CO). Partial oxidation was the second most desirable reaction, as it converted the fuel to a useable syngas, but generated lower yields of syngas than either steam or dry reforming reactions. In addition, oxidative reactions have the potential to oxidize the syngas reducing syngas yields. Reactions associated with thermal cracking/pyrolysis were the least desirable, as they generated hydrocarbons with stronger bonds (C2H2, C2H4) and also provided lowest syngas yields. Note that the above hydrocarbon reactions are also associated with the formation of soot that resulted in reduced syngas yields. The presence of soot not only decreases the syngas yields, efficiency, and reactor performance, but also is an environmental issue.

Table 1

Reforming reactions

NoncatalyticReactionsMinimum time scalesMinimum temperatures
Partial oxidation$CxHy+x2O2→xCO+y2H2$20–100 ms500–1000 °C
Steam reforming$CxHy+xH2O→xCO+y2+xH2$400–500 ms800–1000 °C
Dry reforming$CxHy+xCO2→(2x)CO+y2H2$1000–1200 ms800–1000 °C
Decomposition$CxHy→Cx−nHy−n+Cx−mHy−m+H2$50 ms600–700 °C
Water gas shift$CO+H2O→CO2+H2$300 ms700 °C
NoncatalyticReactionsMinimum time scalesMinimum temperatures
Partial oxidation$CxHy+x2O2→xCO+y2H2$20–100 ms500–1000 °C
Steam reforming$CxHy+xH2O→xCO+y2+xH2$400–500 ms800–1000 °C
Dry reforming$CxHy+xCO2→(2x)CO+y2H2$1000–1200 ms800–1000 °C
Decomposition$CxHy→Cx−nHy−n+Cx−mHy−m+H2$50 ms600–700 °C
Water gas shift$CO+H2O→CO2+H2$300 ms700 °C

### Partial Oxidation Reactions.

Partial oxidation is the exothermic reaction of a hydrocarbon fuel with reduced amounts of oxygen so that the reactions do not precede complete oxidation. This is a rapid reaction, occurring within timescales of 20–100 ms. Inadvertently, some hydrogen will oxidize to form steam, reducing syngas yields. Partial oxidation reformers are designed such that their residence times greatly exceed the timescales needed for partial oxidation reaction (20–100 ms), allowing steam reforming and water gas shift reactions to occur.

Al-Hamamre et al. [16] simulated the partial oxidation of methane with Chemkin code and the verified with the experimental data at O/C ratios of 1.68–1.92. Using injection temperatures of 400 °C, partial oxidation reactions occurred within 10 ms. Drayton et al. [17] evaluated the partial oxidation of methane at reactor temperatures of 1100–1400 °C, and O/C ratios of 0.5–2.0. Numerical simulations were used to support this work. Partial oxidation reactions occurred within 20 ms and accounted for 60% of the hydrogen generated. The remaining hydrogen was concluded to be from steam reforming and the water gas shift reactions. Vourliotakis et al. [18] presented data on the partial oxidation of ethanol at temperatures of 791–804 °C and O/C ratio of 1.5. Their results showed active partial oxidation reactions at timescales of 80 ms. Roth and Wirtz [19] evaluated the partial oxidation of diesel fuel using a reactor with a fixed residence time of 400 ms. The activity of partial oxidation reaction was affected by oxygen concentrations. Zhao et al. [20], Eisazadeh-Far et al. [21], and Tang et al. [22] reported that lowering the oxygen concentrations and dilution within the reactor reduced the activity of the partial oxidation reactions, which is a critical aspect of achieving the distributed reaction regime.

### Steam Reforming Reactions.

Steam reforming is the endothermic decomposition of a hydrocarbon fuel and steam to produce a hydrogen-rich syngas. It was observed that reactor temperatures of 800–1000 °C were required to activate steam reforming reactions [2330] under noncatalytic conditions. Steam reforming reactions are slower, and generally require residence times greater than 400–500 ms. Results that are more favorable appeared when the reactor residence time was on the order of 1000 ms and temperatures between 1000 and 1300 °C. Studies [31,32] using residence times of 50–200 ms, more typical of catalytic reformers, indicated that steam reforming reactions were inactive at these temperatures and timescales. Catalysts enhanced the activity of the steam reforming reactions, allowing full conversion within shorter timescales of 50–200 ms. This results in the steam reforming reactions often being cited as inactive without the presence of catalysts [31,32].

Woodruf [33] demonstrated the steam gasification of char at temperatures of 1000–1050 °C, and residence time of 1000 ms. Molintas [34] showed steam reforming of tar could occur at temperatures of 800–900 °C. Noticeable steam reforming reactions were observed within 5–10 ms. Bartekova investigated the steam cracking (at steam to carbon ratio, S/C = 4.5) of hexadecane at timescales of 50–300 ms and reactor temperatures of 700–760 °C. Under those conditions, the formation of carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide was observed, which was indicative of steam reforming reactions. Jangsawang et al. [35] evaluated cellulose under high temperature air/steam gasification steam gasification conditions. Peak hydrogen concentrations occurred at temperatures of 900 °C.

Jess [7] evaluated toluene, naphthalene, and benzene under steam reforming conditions at temperatures of 700–1400 °C and residence times between 300 and 2000 ms. Steam reforming reactions, as indicated by the evolution of carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide, began to occur at temperatures greater than 1100 °C.

Steam reforming reactions appeared more active in the presence of oxygen and occurred at lower temperatures. Marty and Grouset [36] theorized that oxygen helped to break up stable hydrocarbon molecules, generating free radicals. These radicals then promoted the further decomposition of hydrocarbons and fostered steam reforming reactions. Kinetic studies of steam reforming conducted by Hiblot et al. [8] and Jess [7] supported Marty's [36] theory, as hydrogen was primarily generated through hydroxyl radicals (from steam), interacting primarily with the C1–C2 hydrocarbons. In addition, the heat generated by partial oxidation reactions will foster additional endothermic steam reforming reactions. Sharma and Schoegl [26] evaluated propane under partial oxidation, autothermal, and steam reforming conditions at reactor temperatures of 800–1000 °C and residence times of 1300 ms. The reactor was operated at O/C ratio of 0.42 under partial oxidation and autothermal conditions. Their data did not provide information on the S/C ratios examined. Slight increases in carbon monoxide and hydrogen concentrations were observed when steam was added under partial oxidation conditions, indicating steam reforming reactions were active. However, when operated under pure steam reforming mode (without oxygen), little activity in steam reforming reaction was overserved, as almost no carbon dioxide or carbon monoxide was generated. Products were primarily derived from thermal cracking.

Marty and Grouset [36] also evaluated propane under autothermal conditions, but at higher O/C ratio of 1.2 and S/C ratios of 1.5. Residence times were on order of 1000 ms, but yielded significantly higher amounts of hydrogen concentrations approaching 25%. Parmar [24] evaluated diesel in a blank reactor at O/C ratios of 0.4–1.0 and an S/C ratio of 1.5. The reactor was operated at temperatures of 700–850 °C, and residence time of 2830 ms. From the data (at 850 °C and O/C = 0.4), 25% more oxygen was detected in the molar flow rate of carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide than was available in the air. This additional oxygen was indicative of steam reforming reactions extracting oxygen from the steam releasing additional hydrogen. Roth and Wirtz [19] operated the reactor at residence times of 400 ms and a reactor temperature of 1300 °C. An increase in the steam to carbon ratio promoted an increase in carbon monoxide and hydrogen concentrations to reveal the presence of steam reforming reactions. The work of Scenna and Gupta [4] showed active steam reforming reactions with JP8 that occurred at timescales of 750–850 ms. Figure 1 shows that the addition of steam (S/C = 0–0.10) reduced the reactor temperatures from 1000 °C to 755 °C, while increasing the conversion from 90% to 97%, thus indicating activity in the endothermic steam reforming reactions. Further increase in steam content did not significantly improve the conversion or show such a rapid decrease in reactor temperature. Conversion is defined as the ratio of the molar flow rate of carbon oxidized to the molar flow rate of carbon content of the fuel, see the below equation:

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Close modal
$conversion=molarflowrateofCO+CO2molarflowrateofcarboninfuel$
(1)

### Dry Reforming Reactions.

Dry reforming is the interaction of carbon dioxide with a hydrocarbon fuel. It is considered a slow reaction. Dry reforming reactions are up to three times slower than steam reforming [37]. Data available in the literature often evaluated samples over a period of 15–20 min, or until each sample were completely converted [38]. However, the initial reactions occurred over a relatively short period of time. Dry reforming literature was limited, focusing primarily on waste and biomass feedstocks. In the following, various aspects of dry reforming are presented.

Dry reforming reactions required reactor temperatures of 800–1000 °C and timescales of at least 1000 ms to activate. Zhang et al. [39] observed meaningful conversion (10–80%) of methane through dry reforming reactions at temperatures of 1000–1200 °C. Residence time was on order of 2000 ms. The dry reformation of char from various biomass sources has been examined by a number of authors [27,40,41]. Reactor temperatures of 800–1000 °C were required to activate the dry reforming reactions. Barkia et al. [42] investigated the dry reforming of shale oil using thermal gravimetric analysis. Noticeable conversion occurred at reactor temperatures of 900 °C. No information was shown regarding reformate composition over time.

### Thermal Cracking/Pyrolysis Reactions.

Thermal cracking is the endothermic thermal decomposition of hydrocarbons into smaller hydrocarbons without interaction with oxidizers. These reactions are significantly more active than steam or dry reforming reactions. For certain fuels, temperatures as low as 600–700 °C can activate cracking reactions in time duration as short as 50 ms. Thermal cracking reactions are also associated with deposit and soot formation [43].

A wider range of data was available for pyrolysis reactions. Bartekova and Bajus [44] investigated the thermal steam cracking of hexadecane. Steam was mixed with hexadecane at S/C ratio of 3. The reactants were evaluated at residence times of 5 to 300 ms and reactor temperatures of 700–780 °C. Noticeable conversion occurred at timescales of 5 ms and temperatures of 760 °C. Steam reforming was also observed in this reported work. The activity of the thermal cracking reactions was identified from the formation of lower hydrocarbons in the syngas (CH4, C2H2, and C2H4) without any presence of oxygenated species (carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide). Longer residence times improved conversion and yields. Moler et al. [43] evaluated JP8 under pyrolysis conditions. Temperatures were varied between 350 and 1000 °C, over a period of 300 to 3000 ms. Ten percent conversion was observed at temperatures of 636 °C, over a time duration of 1000 ms. Higher temperatures resulted in rapid conversion. Temperature below 600 °C showed little activity. Moler et al. [43] observed that temperature had a strong impact on the produced gas composition distribution. Reactor temperatures of 600–700 °C favored low molecular weight simple hydrocarbons (C1–C4). Higher temperatures of 700–850 °C favored alkylated cycloalkanes. Even higher temperatures of 850–1000 °C promoted the formation of alkylated benzenes, naphthalenes, and cyclo-aromatics. Temperatures lower than 600 °C did not appear to activate the cracking reactions. Moler also evaluated the effect of stability additive in JP8 on reforming. The JFA-5 additive improved the stability at temperatures less than 350 °C, but showed no influence at temperatures over 600–1000 °C.

Zeppieri et al. [45] presented data on decane pyrolysis in conjunction with the modeling efforts. Experimental data were presented for residence times of up to 220 ms and temperatures from 646 to 757 °C. Activity in the pyrolysis reactions was observed as early as 40 ms. Kang et al. [46] evaluated hexane at longer residence times (1000–5000 ms) as compared to other experimental work. Hexane appeared to be more stable than hexadecane, JP8, or decane, requiring higher temperatures for conversion to occur. Activity in the pyrolysis reactions was overserved only at temperatures of 875 °C and timescales of 1000 ms.

### Water Gas Shift Reactions.

The water gas shift is a mildly exothermic reaction, in which carbon monoxide reacts with steam to produce carbon dioxide and hydrogen. Limited research has been conducted on the homogeneous forward water gas shift under conditions relevant to this work. Graven and Long [47] evaluated the water gas shift reactions at 900 °C and residence times of ∼530–540 ms in a quartz reactor. They observed noticeable activity under these examined conditions. To isolate the forward water gas shift reaction from the reverse water gas shift reaction, they purposefully limited the extent of reaction to ∼0.5–2% by controlling the residence time. These authors also observed that the conversion increased linearly with time, up to 11%. This shows that some reactions will occur, influencing hydrogen concentrations by 1–2%. Bustamante-Londono [48] evaluated the forward and reverse water gas shift reaction at residence times of 300–500 ms, temperatures of 527–927 °C, and pressures of 100–1600 kpa using a quartz and Inconel reactor. While Inconel is typically not considered for its catalytic activity, some catalytic activity was observed with Inconel over that of quartz reactor. At pressures of 100 kpa, the Inconel reactor at temperatures of 527 °C yielded a conversion of about 8%, but at higher temperatures of ∼700 °C much higher conversion of about 70% was achieved. However, the quartz reactor only demonstrated 1% conversion at temperatures of 877–927 °C, with no activity observed at lower temperatures.

## Conventional Reforming

Conventional reforming occurs in three phases: (1) chemical decomposition, (2) oxidation, and (3) steam reformation. Figure 2 shows all three phases for an N-dodecane fuel (C12H26) at unity molar O/C ratio. Initially, the hydrocarbon fuel decomposed into multiple simpler hydrocarbons (CH4, C2H2, and C2H4). This decomposition occurred rapidly near the front of the reactor, but can also occur to a lesser extent in subsequent phases. This was followed by a highly exothermic oxidative region, wherein smaller hydrocarbons generated in the first phase rapidly reacted with the available oxygen. This presented as a rapid increase in reactor temperatures, and the emergence of hydrogen, steam, and other combustion products. After the oxygen was consumed, the steam generated as a byproduct of the oxidative phase promoted the endothermic steam reforming of the remaining unconverted hydrocarbons. Those reactions were slower and occurred near the rear of the reactor. This last phase was denoted by decreasing concentrations of steam and reactor temperatures.

Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Close modal

## Distributed Reforming

In the distributed reaction regime, the characteristic chemical time and length scales exceed characteristic time and length scales associated with turbulent transport. To initiate this, the fuel–air mixture was injected through a high velocity jet into the reactor. This jet entrained hot reactive products into the fuel–air mixture, which diluted the local oxygen concentrations. The dilution helped to reduce the activity of the oxidative reactions [22,49], which lengthened the chemical length and timescales. As partial oxidation undergoes a relatively rapid chemical reaction, a small reduction in activity is not expected to affect the overall conversion. The high velocity jet also enhanced mixing, which reduced the characteristic time and length scales associated with turbulent transport. More distributed conditions promoted greater entrainment of the hot reactive products into the fuel–air mixture, which altered the chemistry when ignition did occur. Without the enhanced mixing and dilution, a conventional flame would have emerged, as reactions would have proceeded at conventional time and length scales. Figure 3 shows the dilution of a premixed charge as a function of entrainment. As entrainment increased, the local fuel and oxygen concentrations diminished, while the local concentrations of hydrogen, steam, carbon monoxide, and carbon dioxide increased substantially.

Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Close modal

The entrainment of hot reactive products into the reaction zone influenced the temperature distribution within the reactor. The entrainment raised the average reactor temperature, while the entrained products reduced peak temperatures through thermal dilution. Elevating the average reactor temperature enhanced the activity of the reforming reactions, while reducing the peak reactor temperature. This limited the thermal cracking reactions and reduced the thermal stresses on the reactor. A higher average temperature also served to stabilize the reactions under low or oxygen-depleted conditions.

The benefits from the distributed reaction regime were derived from the entrainment of the hot reactive product gases into the fuel–air mixture. In reforming, soot was primarily formed through hydrogen abstraction carbon addition (HACA) mechanism [50] (reactions R1–R2 given below), while acetylene was formed through dehydrogenation reactions [8] (reactions R3–R4 given below). In particular, steam and carbon dioxide were shown in combustion literature to suppress acetylene and soot formation [19,5153]. Soot abatement was induced through dilution and chemical interactions of the entrained carbon dioxide and steam. Steam and carbon dioxide promoted the formation of hydroxyl radical, limiting the availability of hydrogen radicals, as shown in reactions R5–R7. The lack of hydrogen radicals interfered with acetylene formation and the HACA mechanism [52,54]. Conditions occurring within the flamelet in eddies regime caused the partial oxidation reactions to propagate faster, thus limiting entrainment. The more distributed conditions are believed to limit the activity of dehydrogenation reaction, which should cause the more distributed conditions to favor reformate products hydrocarbon with a higher H/C ratio.

Hydrogen abstraction carbon addition mechanism reactions:
$CxHy+H⇒CxHy−1+H2$
(R1)
$CxHy−1+C2H2⇒products$
(R2)
Acetylene formation
$C2H4+H→C2H3+H2$
(R3)
$C2H3+H→C2H2+H2$
(R4)
Soot oxidation
$CO2+H⇒OH+CO$
(R5)
$H2O+H⇒2OH$
(R6)
$OH+products⇒CO+H2O$
(R7)

Higher reactor temperatures of 800–1000 °C caused the entrained hot reactive products (steam and carbon dioxide) to promote steam and dry reforming reactions, enhancing reformate yield. The addition of steam to the reactants (wet partial oxidation) will increase this effect. Since more distributed conditions promoted greater entrainment, this offers an increased potential for steam and dry reforming reactions. However, as the distributed reaction regime promoted a well-mixed condition (minimizing carbon dioxide formation) and since the steam reforming reactions are considered up to three times faster [37], we conjecture that the distributed reaction regime primarily will influenced be by steam reforming reactions. Dry reforming was still thought to have occurred, but was not as active as steam reforming reactions. In conventional partial oxidation, steam reforming reactions only occurred toward the rear (tail end) of the reactor, wherein distributed reforming, steam reforming reactions were active throughout the reactor.

The experimental data conducted by this work support these observations provided here. In a low temperature reactor (700–800 °C), outlined in the works of Scenna and Gupta [1,3], the reformate consisted of low concentrations of hydrogen and significant hydrocarbon formation. From the literature, reactor temperatures lower than 800 °C limit the activity of the steam and dry reforming reactions at these temperatures. Even though the reactor temperatures limited the activity of these reactions, to result in low syngas yields, the entrainment of steam and carbon dioxide influenced the activity of the HACA soot formation mechanism. This in turn affected the hydrocarbon product distribution in the syngas. In Scenna and Gupta [1,3], it was observed that for a given O/C ratio, conditions that occurred within the flamelets in eddies regime exhibited higher concentrations of hydrogen, acetylene, and soot, which indicated activity of the HACA chemical reactions. For conditions that occurred in the distributed reaction regime, the product distribution shifted to favor higher concentrations of ethylene and methane, without observable amounts of soot formation, indicating a reduction in the HACA mechanism activity. As predicted under distributed reaction regime, hydrocarbons exhibited a higher H/C ratio as hydrogen abstraction reaction was suppressed. This can be observed from Figs. 4 and 5.

Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Close modal
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Close modal

At high reactor temperatures (800–1000 °C), conditions were sufficient to activate dry and steam reforming reactions to generate higher hydrogen yields. The more distributed conditions reduced the activity in the partial oxidation reaction, which allowed for greater conversion through the steam and dry reactions. Within the high temperature work of Scenna and Gupta [2], reducing the air preheats promoted a greater distributed reactor configuration, which correlated with increased conversion and efficiency. Decrease in air preheats increased hydrogen and carbon monoxide concentrations. Under wet partial oxidation conditions, Scenna and Gupta [4] showed that addition of trace amounts of steam (S/C = 0.01) resulted in a more distributed condition and increased conversion (4.83–8.63 ± 2.1%). Steam itself reduces the chemical time and length scales, allowing a more distributed condition to emerge. However, assuming that all added steam promoted steam reforming reactions, the small amount of added steam could have only improved conversion by at most 1.53–1.59% ± 0.03%. This discrepancy in conversion was attributed to the steam reforming induced by the entrainment of hot reactive products into the fuel–air mixture. In Scenna and Gupta [55], the effects of distributed reaction regime were less discernable, as there were two competing effects when the oxygen content was varied. Increases in oxygen content resulted in a less distributed condition, but showed improved reformate quality. However, as the reactions were limited by the availability of oxygen, the addition of oxygen enhanced the extent of reforming reactions. This promoted increased conversion, which offset the negative effects caused by the reactor becoming less distributed, and any dry or steam reforming reactions that may have been promoted. In this case, the more distributed condition also promoted less steam formation, minimizing the effect of added steam reforming reactions. Figures 6 and 7 show a noticeable change in reformate quality between the high and low temperature reactors. Both reactors operated under dry partial oxidation conditions, at O/C ratios of 1.0–1.3. Higher temperature conditions improved reformate composition, which also showed increased efficiency and conversion. Higher temperature conditions were associated with greater activity in the steam and dry reforming reactions.

Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Close modal
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Close modal

## Conclusions

The distributed reaction regime and the corresponding entrainment of hot reactive products influenced the chemistry occurring within the reactor. As the current understanding of the chemistry of homogeneous reforming of larger hydrocarbons is still developing, literature was used to estimate the activity of the reforming reactions.

The entrainment of the hot reactive products (heat, steam, carbon dioxide, and other gas phase species) into the fuel–air mixture reduced the oxygen concentrations, which allowed the distributed reaction regime to emerge. These reactive species promoted the potential for steam reforming reactions and, to a lesser extent, dry reforming reactions to occur. In addition, the entrainment of steam and carbon dioxide will also suppress the formation of soot and acetylene. Steam and carbon dioxide will absorb hydrogen radicals, which prevent them from promoting hydrogen abstraction reactions that promote the formation of acetylene and soot (via HACA mechanism). The more distributed conditions allowed for greater entrainment to promote these benefits. The partial oxidation reactions produce radicals, which promote secondary dry and steam reforming reactions.

## Acknowledgment

This works was funded through the United States Army's In-House Laboratory Innovative Research Program.

## Funding Data

• U.S. Army Communications-Electronics Research, Development and Engineering Center (ILIR).

## Nomenclature

• Conversion =

$molarflowrateofCO+CO2molarflowrateofcarboninfuel$

•
• HACA =

hydrogen abstraction carbon addition

•
• O/C =

molar oxygen to carbon ratio

•
• S/C =

molar steam to carbon ratio

## References

1.
Scenna
,
R.
, and
Gupta
,
A.
,
2016
, “
Preheats Effect on Distributed Reaction Fuel Reforming
,”
ASME
Paper No. POWER2015-49039.
2.
Scenna
,
R.
, and
Gupta
,
A. K. A. K.
,
2016
, “
Partial Oxidation of JP8 in a Well-Insulated Distributed Reactor
,”
Fuel Process. Technol.
,
142
, pp.
174
181
.
3.
Scenna
,
R.
, and
Gupta
,
A. K. A. K.
,
2015
, “
Partial Oxidation of JP8 in a Distributed Reactor
,”
Fuel Process. Technol.
,
134
, pp.
205
213
.
4.
Scenna
,
R.
, and
Gupta
,
A. K. A. K.
,
2017
, “
Dry and Wet Partial Oxidation in a Distributed Reactor
,”
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
,
42
(
7
), pp.
4102
4110
.
5.
Scenna
,
R.
, and
Gupta
,
A. K.
,
2014
, “
Soot Formation Reaction Effect in Modeling Thermal Partial Oxidation of Jet A
,”
ASME
Paper No. POWER2014-32252.
6.
Alzahrani
,
F.
,
Sanusi
,
Y.
,
Vogiatzaki
,
K.
,
Ghoniem
,
A.
,
Habib
,
M.
, and
Mokheimer
,
E.
,
2015
, “
Evaluation of the Accuracy of Selected Syngas Chemical Mechanisms
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
137
(
4
), p. 042201.
7.
Jess
,
A.
,
1996
, “
Mechanisms and Kinetics of Thermal Reactions of Aromatic Hydrocarbons From Pyrolysis of Solid Fuels
,”
Fuel
,
75
(
12
), pp.
1441
1448
.
8.
Hiblot
,
H.
,
Ziegler-Devin
,
I.
,
Fournet
,
R.
, and
Glaude
,
P. A.
,
2016
, “
Steam Reforming of Methane in a Synthesis Gas From Biomass Gasification
,”
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
,
41
(
41
), pp.
18329
18338
.
9.
Scenna
,
R.
,
DuBois
,
T.
, and
Gupta
,
A. K.
,
2014
, “
Chemical Modeling of Thermal Partial Oxidation of a JP8/Jet a Surrogate
,”
46th Army Power Sources
, Orlando, FL, June 9–12.https://ntrl.ntis.gov/NTRL/dashboard/searchResults/titleDetail/PB2014109314.xhtml
10.
Mokheimer
,
E.
,
Hussain
,
M.
,
Ahmed
,
S.
,
Habib
,
M.
, and
Al-Qutub
,
A.
,
2015
, “
On the Modeling of Steam Methane Reforming
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
137
(
1
), p. 012001.
11.
Zhou
,
X.
,
Chen
,
C.
, and
Wang
,
F.
,
2010
, “
Multi-Dimensional Modeling of Non-Catalytic Partial Oxidation of Natural Gas in a High Pressure Reformer
,”
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
,
35
(
4
), pp.
1620
1629
.
12.
Halama
,
S.
, and
Spliethoff
,
H.
,
2016
, “
Reaction Kinetics of Pressurized Entrained Flow Coal Gasification: Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation of a 5 MW Siemens Test Gasifier
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol
,
138
(
4
), p. 042204.
13.
Ranzi
,
E.
,
Frassoldati
,
A.
,
Granata
,
S.
, and
Faravelli
,
T.
,
2005
, “
Wide-Range Kinetic Modeling Study of the Pyrolysis, Partial Oxidation, and Combustion of Heavy N-Alkanes
,”
Ind. Eng.
,
44
(
14
), pp.
5170
5183
.
14.
Strelkova
,
M. I.
,
Kirillov
,
I. A.
,
Potapkin
,
B. V.
,
Safonov
,
A. A.
,
Sukhanov
,
L. P.
,
Umanskiy
,
S. Y.
,
Deminsky
,
M. A.
,
Dean
,
A. J.
,
Varatharajan
,
B.
, and
Tentner
,
A. M.
,
2008
, “
Detailed and Reduced Mechanisms of Jet a Combustion at High Temperatures,” Combust
,”
Sci. Technol.
,
180
(
10–11
), pp.
1788
1802
.
15.
Westbrook
,
C. K.
,
Pitz
,
W. J.
,
Herbinet
,
O.
,
Curran
,
H. J.
, and
Silke
,
E. J.
,
2009
, “
A Comprehensive Detailed Chemical Kinetic Reaction Mechanism for Combustion of N-Alkane Hydrocarbons From N-Octane to N-Hexadecane
,”
Combust. Flame
,
156
(
1
), pp.
181
199
.
16.
Al-Hamamre
,
Z.
,
Voß
,
S.
, and
Trimis
,
D.
,
2007
, “
Detailed Experimental and Numerical Investigation of the Partial Oxidation of Methane in a Porous Reactor
,”
European Combustion Meeting
(
ECM
), Crete, Greece, Apr. 11–13, pp.
1
4
.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265741765_Detailed_Experimental_and_Numerical_Investigation_of_the_Partial_Oxidation_of_Methane_in_a_Porous_Reactor
17.
Drayton
,
M. K.
,
Saveliev
,
A. V.
,
Kennedy
,
L. A.
,
Fridman
,
A. A.
, and
Li
,
Y. D.
,
1998
, “
Syngas Production Using Superadiabatic Combustion of Ultra-Rich Methane-Air Mixtures
,”
Symposium on Combustion
,
27
(1), pp.
1361
1367
.
18.
Vourliotakis
,
G.
,
Skevis
,
G.
, and
Founti
,
M.
, a,
2009
, “
Detailed Kinetic Modelling of Non-Catalytic Ethanol Reforming for SOFC Applications
,”
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
,
34
(
18
), pp.
7626
7637
.
19.
Roth
,
K.
, and
Wirtz
,
S.
,
2007
, “
Investigation of Soot Formation During Partial Oxidation of Diesel Fuel
,”
Chem. Eng. Technol.
,
30
(
6
), pp.
782
789
.
20.
Zhao
,
Z.
,
Kazakov
,
A.
,
Li
,
J.
, and
Dryer
,
F. L.
,
2004
, “
The Initial Temperature and N2 Dilution Effect on the Laminar Flame Speed of Propane/Air
,”
Combust. Sci. Technol.
,
176
(
10
), pp.
1
9
.
21.
,
K.
,
,
A.
,
Metghalchi
,
H.
, and
Keck
,
J. C.
,
2011
, “
The Effect of Diluent on Flame Structure and Laminar Burning Speeds of JP-8/Oxidizer/Diluent Premixed Flames
,”
Fuel
,
90
(
4
), pp.
1476
1486
.
22.
Tang
,
C.
,
Huang
,
Z.
,
He
,
J.
,
Jin
,
C.
,
Wang
,
X.
, and
Miao
,
H.
,
2009
, “
Effects of N2 Dilution on Laminar Burning Characteristics of Propane—Air Premixed Flames
,”
Energy Fuels
,
23
(
1
), pp.
151
156
.
23.
Galvagno
,
S.
,
Casu
,
S.
,
Casciaro
,
G.
,
Martino
,
M.
,
Russo
,
A.
,
Process
,
T.
,
En
,
V.
,
Di
,
V.
,
Trisaia
,
C. R. E.
, and
Jonica
,
S. S.
,
2006
, “
Steam Gasification of Refuse-Derived Fuel (RDF): Influence of Process Temperature on Yield and Product Composition
,”
Energy Fuels
,
20
(5), pp.
2284
2288
.
24.
Parmar
,
R.
,
2013
, “
A Combined Gas-Phase and Surface Reaction Mechanisitic Model of Diesel Surrogate Reforming for SOFC Application
,”
Ph.D. thesis
, Queen's University Kingston, Kingston, ON, Canada.http://hdl.handle.net/1974/7917
25.
Yoon
,
S.
,
Kang
,
I.
, and
Bae
,
J.
,
2008
, “
Effects of Ethylene on Carbon Formation in Diesel Autothermal Reforming
,”
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
,
33
(
18
), pp.
4780
4788
.
26.
Sharma
,
M.
, and
Schoegl
,
I.
,
2013
, “
A Comparative Assessment of Homogeneous Propane Peforming at Intermediate Temperatures
,”
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
,
38
(
30
), pp.
13272
13281
.
27.
Ahmed
,
I. I.
, and
Gupta
,
A. K.
,
2011
, “
Kinetics of Woodchips Char Gasification With Steam and Carbon Dioxide
,”
Appl. Energy
,
88
(
5
), pp.
1613
1619
.
28.
Gupta
,
A. K.
, and
Cichonski
,
W.
,
2007
, “
Ultra-High Temperature Steam Gasification of Biomass and Solid Wastes
,”
Environ. Eng. Sci.
,
24
(
8
), pp.
1179
1189
.
29.
Ortiz
, and
toral
,
P. J.
,
2008
, “
Steam Reforming of Bio-Oil: Effect of Bio-Oil Composition and Stability
,”
M.Sc thesis
, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2592&context=etd
30.
Chhiti
,
Y.
,
2011
, “
Non Catalytic Steam Gasification of Wood Bio-Oil
,”
Ph.D. thesis
, University of Toulouse, Toulouse, France.http://oatao.univ-toulouse.fr/7128/1/chhiti.pdf
31.
Brandmair
,
M.
,
2005
, “
Autothermal Reforming of n-Hexane Over Supported Metal Catalysts
,”
Doctoral dissertation
, Technische Universitat Munchen, München, Germany.https://mediatum.ub.tum.de/doc/601441/601441.pdf
32.
Chen
,
X.
,
Dahlberg
,
K. A.
,
Gould
,
B. D.
, and
Schwank
,
J. W.
,
2015
, “
Ni-Based Monolith N-Dodecane Reforming Catalysts: Optimization of O/C and Effect of Ni Interaction With Cordierite
,”
Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.
,
54
(
16
), pp.
4136
4147
.
33.
Woodruff
,
R. B.
,
2012
, “
Investigation of High Temperature Steam Gasification of Biomass Char
,”
Chemical and Biological Engineering Graduate Theses
34.
Molintas
,
H.
,
2015
, “
Gasification and Combustion of Large Char Particles and Tar
,”
Ph.D. thesis
, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.https://drum.lib.umd.edu/handle/1903/17338
35.
Jangsawang
,
W.
,
Klimanek
,
A.
, and
Gupta
,
A. K.
,
2006
, “
Enhanced Yield of Hydrogen From Wastes Using High Temperature Steam Gasification
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
128
(
3
), pp.
179
185
.
36.
Marty
,
P.
, and
Grouset
,
D.
,
2003
, “
High Temperature Hybrid Steam-Reforming for Hydrogen Generation Without Catalyst
,”
J. Power Sources
,
118
(
1–2
), pp.
66
70
.
37.
Burnham
,
A.
,
1979
, “
Reaction Kinetics Between Steam and Oil-Shale Residual Carbon
,”
Fuel
,
58
(
10
), pp.
719
723
.
38.
Molintas
,
H. J.
, and
Gupta
,
A. K.
,
2009
, “
Thermal Decomposition of Cardboard Wastes Using Steam Gasification
,”
International Thermal Treatment Technologies Conference
, Cincinnati, OH, May 18–21.
39.
Zhang
,
W.
,
Zhan
,
Y.
,
Zhang
,
M.
,
Tian
,
C.
, and
Zhao
,
W.
,
2009
, “
The Characteristic of CH4-CO2 Reforming Catalyzed by Carbonaceous Catalyst
,”
IEC Gasification Conference
Publication.
40.
Lin
,
L.
, and
Strand
,
M.
,
2013
, “
Investigation of the Intrinsic CO2 Gasification Kinetics of Biomass Char at Medium to High Temperatures
,”
Appl. Energy
,
109
, pp.
220
228
.
41.
Mani
,
T.
, and
Mahinpey
,
N.
,
2013
, “
Flax Straw Char-CO2 Gasification Kinetics and Its Inhibition Studies With CO
,”
Can. J. Chem. Eng.
,
91
(
5
), pp.
882
888
.
42.
Barkia
,
H.
,
Belkbir
,
L.
, and
Jayaweera
,
S. A. A.
,
2004
, “
Non-Isothermal Kinetics of Gasification by CO2 of Residual Carbon From Timahdit and Tarfaya Oil Shale Kerogens
,”
J. Therm. Anal. Calorim.
,
76
(
2
), pp.
623
632
.
43.
Moler
,
J. L.
,
Steward
,
E. M.
, and
Taylor
,
P. H.
, 1990, “
High Temperature Gas Phase Pyrolysis of JP-8
,”
Symposium on the Stability and Oxidation of Middle Distillate Fuels
, pp. 1324–1331.https://web.anl.gov/PCS/acsfuel/preprint%20archive/Files/35_4_WASHINGTON%20DC_08-90_1324.pdf
44.
Bartekova
,
E.
, and
Bajus
,
M.
,
1997
, “
,”
Czech. Chem. Commun.
,
62
(
7
), pp.
1057
1069
.
45.
Zeppieri
,
S. P.
,
Klotz
,
S. D.
, and
Dryer
,
F. L.
,
2000
, “
Modeling Concepts for Larger Carbon Number Alkanes: A Partially Reduced Skeletal Mechanism for N-Decane Oxidation and Pyrolysis
,”
Proc. Combust. Inst.
,
28
(
2
), pp.
1587
1595
.
46.
Kang
,
I.
,
Carstensen
,
H.-H.
, and
Dean
,
A. M.
,
2011
, “
Impact of Gas-Phase Reactions in the Mixing Region Upstream of a Diesel Fuel Autothermal Reformer
,”
J. Power Sources
,
196
(
4
), pp.
2020
2026
.
47.
Graven
,
W.
, and
Long
,
J.
,
1954
, “
Kinetics and Mechanism of the Two Opposing Reaction of the Equilibrium CO+H2O=CO2=H21
,”
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
,
76
(
10
), pp.
2602
2607
.
48.
Bustamante-Londono
,
F.
,
2004
, “
The High-Temperature, High-Pressure Homogeneous Water-Gas Shift Reaction in a Membrane Reactor
,”
Doctoral dissertation
, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/id/eprint/8276
49.
Arghode
,
V. K.
,
2011
, “
Development of Colorless Distributed Combustion for Gas Turbine Applications
,”
Ph.D. thesis
, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.http://hdl.handle.net/1903/12230
50.
Xu
,
F.
,
Sunderland
,
P. B.
, and
Faeth
,
G. M.
,
1997
, “
Soot Formation in Laminar Premixed Ethylene/Air Flames at Atmospheric Pressure
,”
Combust. Flame
,
108
(
4
), pp.
471
493
.
51.
Al-Quarashi
,
2007
, “
The Impact of Carbon Dioxide and Exhaust Gas Recirculation on the Oxidative Reactivity of Soot From Ethylene Flames and Diesel Engines
,”
Ph.D. thesis
, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA.https://etda.libraries.psu.edu/catalog/7746
52.
Liu
,
F.
,
Consalvi
,
J. L.
, and
Fuentes
,
A.
,
2014
, “
Effects of Water Vapor Addition to the Air Stream on Soot Formation and Flame Properties in a Laminar Coflow Ethylene/Air Diffusion Flame
,”
Combust. Flame
,
161
(
7
), pp.
1724
1734
.
53.
Barua
,
A.
,
2012
, “
Soot Formation in Diffusion Flames of Alternative Turbine Fuels at Elevated Pressures
,”
M.Sc thesis
, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.http://hdl.handle.net/1807/33333
54.
Ruiz
,
M. P.
,
Callejas
,
A.
,
Millera
,
A.
,
Alzueta
,
M. U.
, and
Bilbao
,
R.
,
2007
, “
Soot Formation From C2H2 and C2H4 Pyrolysis at Different Temperatures
,”
J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis
,
79
(
1–2
), pp.
244
251
.
55.
Scenna
,
R.
, and
Gupta
,
A. K.
,
2017
, “
Effect of Oxygen to Concentration on the Distributed Flame Regime
,”
ASME
Paper No. ICOPE2017-3798.