Abstract

The two-stroke spark-ignition (SI) kerosene piston engines (KPE) are commonly utilized in lightweight unmanned aerial vehicles. The quality of mixture formation is crucial for the engine performance. This paper investigates the mixture quality in a semi-direct injection (SDI) SI KPE. Computational models were established using a 1D simulation tool and a 3D computational platform to analyze the effects of injection pressure, injection timing, and fuel temperature on atomization and mixture formation. The results indicate that increasing injection pressure promotes a more uniform mixture distribution. Higher injection pressures also enhance the formation of fuel film. At the top dead center (TDC), the average equivalence ratio (ER) with an injection pressure of 0.7 MPa is 3.8% higher than that of 0.3 MPa and 1.9% lower than that of 0.5 MPa. Delaying the injection timing increases the pressure difference between the cylinder and scavenging port, weakening fuel penetration and improving the fuel gasification rate. When the injection timing is set to 180 °CA ATDC, the average ER at TDC is 10.4% higher than that at 140 °CA ATDC, with a 6.6% decrease in fuel capture rate. Increasing fuel temperature effectively enhances the fuel gasification rate. However, excessively higher fuel temperatures will not significantly improve mixture quality. At a fuel temperature of 380 K, the average ER at TDC is 2.9% higher than that at 340 K. Response surface analysis reveals that the control parameters affect the average ERs in the following order of influence: injection timing, fuel temperature, and injection pressure. This study provides theoretical support for optimizing control parameters in SDI SI KPEs.

References

1.
Li
,
J.
,
Zhou
,
L.
,
Zhao
,
Z.
,
Wang
,
X.
, and
Zhang
,
F.
,
2019
, “
Research on Knocking Characteristics of Kerosene Spark-Ignition Engine for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) by Numerical Simulation
,”
Ther. Sci. Eng. Prog.
,
9
, pp.
1
10
.
2.
Oh
,
S.
,
Park
,
C.
,
Nguyen
,
D.
,
Kim
,
S.
,
Kim
,
Y.
,
Choi
,
Y.
, and
Lee
,
J.
,
2021
, “
Investigation on the Operable Range and Idle Condition of Hydrogen-Fueled Spark Ignition Engine for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)
,”
Energy
,
237
, p.
121645
.
3.
Liao
,
B.
,
Zhang
,
F.
,
Chen
,
Z.
,
Qin
,
T.
,
Lin
,
X.
, and
Guo
,
Y.
,
2023
, “
Effect of Injection Strategy on an Air-Assisted Direct Injection Aviation Kerosene Two-Stroke Engine
,”
Appl. Therm. Eng.
,
233
, p.
121193
.
4.
Zhao
,
Z.
, and
Wang
,
L.
,
2024
, “
Technical Difficulties and Development Enlightenment of Aviation Heavy Fuel Piston Engines
,”
J. Aerosp. Power
,
39
(
4
), p.
20220347
.
5.
Ding
,
S.
,
Song
,
Y.
,
Du
,
F.
, and
Zhou
,
Y.
,
2021
, “
Analysis of the Development Trend and Key Technologies of Aviation Heavy Fuel Piston Engine
,”
J. Aerosp. Power
,
36
(
6
), pp.
1121
1136
.
6.
Chen
,
L.
,
Ding
,
S.
,
Liu
,
H.
,
Lu
,
Y.
,
Li
,
Y.
, and
Roskilly
,
A. P.
,
2017
, “
Comparative Study of Combustion and Emissions of Kerosene (RP-3), Kerosene-Pentanol Blends and Diesel in a Compression Ignition Engine
,”
Appl. Energy
,
203
, pp.
91
100
.
7.
Department of Defense
,
2004
, “
Directive 4140.25. DoD Management Policy of Energy Commodities and Relates Service
,
Department of Defense
,
Washington, DC
.
8.
North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)
,
2007
, “
NATO Logistics Handbook
,” Senior NATO Logisticians' Conference (SNLC), Brussel, Belgium.
9.
Rozenkranc
,
M.
, and
Ernst
,
J.
,
2003
, “
Tactical UAV Engines Integration in IAI
, AIAA 2003-6534.
10.
Darzi
,
M.
,
Johnson
,
D.
,
Ulishney
,
C.
, and
Clark
,
N.
,
2018
, “
Low Pressure Direct Injection Strategies Effect on a Small SI Natural Gas Two-Stroke Engine's Energy Distribution and Emissions
,”
Appl. Energy
,
230
, pp.
1585
1602
.
11.
Ding
,
S.
,
Shao
,
L.
,
Zhao
,
S.
,
Zhu
,
K
, and
Zhou
,
Y.
,
2022
, “
Fuel Injection Technology of Heavy Fuel Aircraft Piston Engine
,”
J. Beijing Univ. Aeronaut. Astronaut.
,
48
(
9
), pp.
1630
1642
.
12.
Laimböck
,
F. J.
,
Klasnic
,
H.
,
Grilc
,
S.
,
Meister
,
G. F.
, and
Dorfstätter
,
M. J.
,
1999
, “
AVL SDIS Mk.II—Low Cost Automotive FI Applied to 2-Stroke Engines for Future CARB—Regulations
,”
SAE Trans.
,
108
, pp.
1286
1321
.
13.
Eric
,
E. J.
,
1975
, “
Two-Stroke Engine Construction
,” US Patent No. 3881454.
14.
Laimböck
,
F. J.
,
2003
, “
Two-Stroke Internal Combustion Engine With Crankcase Scavenging
,” US Patent No. 6539900.
15.
Wu
,
M. M.
,
Yang
,
Y. X.
,
Xi
,
D. G.
,
Zhang
,
P.
, and
Jin
,
Z. G.
,
2011
, “
Two-Stroke Engine With Fuel Semi-Direct Injection Using FAI System
,”
Appl. Mech. Mater.
,
130–134
, pp.
796
799
.
16.
Luo
,
D.
,
Qian
,
Y.
,
Yu
,
X.
, and
Yun
,
Q.
,
2001
, “
Research and Experimentation on Electronically Controlled Semi-Direct Injection Two-Stroke Gasoline Engine
,”
Trans. CSICE
,
19
(
1
), pp.
51
54
.
17.
Shi
,
Y.
,
2012
,
Study on Heavy-Fuel Mixture Formation of Light-Weight, Spark-Ignition, Two-Stroke Engine
,
Jiaotong University
,
Beijing, China
.
18.
Wu
,
H.
,
Yang H
,
Q.
,
Liu
,
R.
, et al
,
2022
, “
Calculation and Analysis on Performance Characteristics of Two-Stroke Semi-Direct Injection Kerosene Engine
,”
J. Chongqing Univ. Technol. Nat. Sci.
,
36
(
3
), pp.
232
239
.
19.
Liu
,
R.
,
Huang
,
K.
,
Qiao
,
Y.
,
Ji
,
H.
,
Zhong
,
L.
, and
Wu
,
H.
,
2022
, “
Effects of Low Pressure Injection on Fuel Atomization and Mixture Formation for Heavy Fuel Engines
,”
Processes
,
10
(
11
), p.
2276
.
20.
Zhao
,
Z.
,
Yu
,
C.
,
Dong
,
X.
, and
Wang
,
L.
,
2021
, “
Research on Mixture Formation of Two-Stroke Heavy Fuel Direct Injection Engine
,”
J. Aerosp. Power
,
36
(
8
), pp.
1569
1577
.
21.
Xin
,
Q.
,
2011
,
Diesel Engine System Design
,
Woodhead
,
Cambridge, UK
.
You do not currently have access to this content.