An experiment was conducted to evaluate the potential for reduced exhaust emissions and improved efficiency, by way of lean-burn engine fuelling with hydrogen supplemented natural gas (Hythane). The emissions and efficiency of the Hythane fuel (15 percent hydrogen, 85 percent natural gas by volume), were compared to the emissions and efficiency of pure natural gas using a turbocharged, spark ignition, 3.1 L, V-6 engine. The feasibility of heavy duty engine fueling with Hythane was assessed through testing conducted at engine speed and load combinations typical of heavy-duty engine operation. Comparison of the efficiency and emissions at MBT spark timing revealed that Hythane fueling of the test engine resulted in consistently lower brake specific energy consumption and emissions of total hydrocarbons (THC), carbon monoxide (CO), and carbon dioxide (CO2), at a given equivalence ratio. There was no clear trend with respect to MBT oxides of nitrogen (NOx) emissions. It was also discovered that an improved NOx-THC tradeoff resulted when Hythane was used to fuel the test engine. Consequently, Hythane engine operating parameters can be adjusted to achieve a concurrent reduction in NOx and THC emissions relative to natural gas fueling.

Issue Section:
Internal Combustion Engines
Topics:
Emissions, Engines, Natural gas, Nitrogen oxides, Carbon dioxide, Fuels, Hydrogen, Brakes, Carbon, Energy consumption, Exhaust systems, Ignition, Nitrogen, Stress, Testing, Tradeoffs
1.
Cattelan, A. I., and Wallace, J. S., 1994, “Hythane and CNG Fuelled Engine Exhaust Emission and Engine Efficiency Comparison,” Presented at the Tenth World Hydrogen Energy Conference, Cocoa Beach, FL.
2.
Eccleston, D. B., and Fleming, R. D., 1972, “Clean Automotive Fuel,” U.S. Bureau of Mines Automotive Exhaust Emissions Program, Technical Progress Report 48.
3.
Foute, S., Knowlton, T., Lynch, F., Ragazzi, R., and Raman, V., 1992, “The Denver Hythane Project—Recent Progress,” Presented at the Tenth Anniversary Conference, Industry and Hydrogen, Kananaskis, Alberta, Canada.
4.
Glassman, I., 1987, Combustion, Academic Press, Inc., Orlando, FL.
5.
Heywood, J. B., 1988, Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York.
6.
Ja¨a¨skela¨inen, H. E., and Wallace, J. S., 1994, “Examination of Charge Dilution With EGR to Reduce NOx Emissions From a Natural Gas Fueled 16 Valve DOHC Four-Cylinder Engine,” SAE Paper No. 942006.
7.
Klimstra, J., 1985, “The Optimum Combustion Phasing Angle—A Convenient Engine Tuning Criterion,” SAE Paper No. 852090.
8.
Milton
B. E.
, and
Keck
J. C.
,
1984
, “
Laminar Burning Velocities in Stoichiometric Hydrogen and Hydrogen-Hydrocarbon Gas Mixtures
,”
Combustion and Flame
, Vol.
58
, pp.
13
–
22
.
9.
Newhall, H. K., 1969, “Kinetics of Engine-Generated Nitrogen Oxides and Carbon Monoxide,” Proc. 12th Symposium on Combustion, pp. 603–613.
10.
Strothers, R., 1993, “Hythane—Its Potential as a Fuel for Internal Combustion Engines,” Final Report for ORTECH Corporation Project Number 600197.
11.
Swain, M. R., Yusuf, M. J., Du¨lger, Z., and Swain, M. N., 1993, “The Effects of Hydrogen Addition on Natural Gas Engine Operation,” SAE Paper No. 932775.
12.
Thompson, N. D., and Wallace, J. S., 1994, “Effect of Engine Operating Variables and Piston and Ring Parameters on Crevice Hydrocarbon Emissions,” SAE Paper No. 940480.
This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright © 1997
 by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
You do not currently have access to this content.