The last stage blades (LSBs) of low-pressure (LP) turbine power plants have been historically specified and designed on the basis of optimization studies by matching the turbine to the condenser/cooling system for a specified unit rating. LSB sizes for U.S. nuclear applications currently range from 38 in. to 52 in. for unit ratings of 600 MWe to 1200 MWe. LP turbine arrangements usually consist of two or three double-flow sections in parallel. Last stage end loadings (last stage mass flow divided by the last stage annulus area) vary from approximately $8000lb∕hsqftto14,000lb∕hsqft$, with corresponding unit loadings (electrical output in megawatts divided by last stage annulus area) of 1.1 $MWe∕sqftto2.1MWe∕sqft$. Several power plants have been upgrading/replacing their LP turbines. Considerations include efficiency, reliability, power uprates, operating license renewals (nuclear), aging, inspection, and maintenance. In some cases, LP turbine rotors are being replaced with new rotors, blading, and steam path. Others are replacing LP turbines with new and advanced designs incorporating improved technology, better materials, optimized steam paths, more efficient blading, longer LSB sizes, redesigned exhaust hoods, etc. Unlike the other stages in the LP turbine, the last stage performance is affected by both the upstream (load) and downstream (condenser) conditions. While the LP turbines are being upgraded or replaced, no major modifications or upgrades are being made to the condensers. To address vibration effects due to increased flows and velocities from power uprates, the condenser tubes may be staked. Circulating water pumps may or may not be upgraded depending upon the particular application. Consequently, while improvements in LP turbines lead to more efficient utilization of the available energy and higher output, the last stage performance may be out of synchronization with the existing condenser/cooling system. Undersized or oversized LSB sizes in relation to the unit rating and end loading may result in less than optimum performance depending upon the design and operating range of the condenser/cooling system. This paper examines the various factors that affect last stage performance of LP turbines. Using a case study, it discusses the relationships between the last stage, the unit rating, the end loading, and the operating range of the condenser/cooling system. It examines different last stage exhaust loss curves and provides recommendations for selection of LSB sizes for optimum performance.

1.
Salisbury
,
J. K.
, 1974,
Steam Turbines and their Cycles
,
Krieger
,
Huntington, NY
.
2.
Steltz
,
W. G.
,
Evans
,
D. H.
, and
Desai
,
K. J.
, 1978, “
Advances in Low Pressure Steam Turbine Thermal Performance
,”
Paper Presented at the Westinghouse Steam Turbine-Generator Technology Symposium
,
Charlotte, NC
, Oct. 4–5.
3.
Jacobsen
,
G.
,
Oeynhausen
,
H.
, and
Termuehlen
,
H.
, 1991, “
Advanced LP Turbine Installation at 1300MW Power Station Unterweser
,”
Paper Presented at the American Power Conference
,
Chicago, IL
, Apr. 29-May 1.
4.
Gray
,
L.
,
Sandhu
,
S. S.
,
Davids
,
J.
, and
Southall
,
L. R.
, 1989, “
Technical Considerations in Optimizing Blade-Exhaust Hood Performance for Low Pressure Steam Turbines
,”
ASME Paper Presented at the Joint Power Generation Conference
,
Dallas, TX
, Oct. 22–26.
5.
Owczarek
,
J. A.
,
Warnock
,
A. S.
, and
Malik
,
P.
, 1989, “
A Low Pressure Turbine Exhaust End Flow Model Study
,”
ASME Paper Presented at the Joint Power Generation Conference
,
Dallas, TX
, Oct. 22–26.
6.
Baily
,
F. G.
,
Cotton
,
K. C.
, and
Spencer
,
R. C.
, 1967, “
Predicting The Performance of Large Steam Turbine-Generators Operating With Saturated And Superheated Steam Conditions
,”
Presented at the American Power Conference
,
Chicago, IL
, Apr. 25–27.
7.
Baily
,
F. G.
,
Booth
,
J. A.
,
Cotton
,
K. C.
, and
Miller
,
E. H.
, 1974, “
Predicting The Performance of 1800-Rpm Large Steam Turbine-Generators Operating With Light Water-Cooled Reactors
,” General Electric Company Paper GET-6020.
8.
Sunder Raj
,
K. S.
, 2005, “
Performance Considerations in Power Uprates of Nuclear Power Plants
,” ASME Paper PWR2005-50003.
9.
Sunder Raj
,
K. S.
, 2005, “
Performance Considerations in Replacement of Low-Pressure Turbine Rotors for Nuclear Power Plants—A Case Study
,” ASME Paper PWR2005-50005.
10.
General Electric Guidelines No. 222A4446, 1969, “
Summary of Condenser Neck Recommendations for Use by Architect-Engineer and Condenser Manufacturer
.”