Abstract

The EPA’s proposed test plan for the validation testing of pesticide spray drift reduction technologies (DRTs) for row and field crops, focusing on the evaluation of ground application systems using the low-speed wind tunnel measurements and dispersion modeling, was evaluated. Relative drift reduction potential for a given DRT tested in a low-speed wind tunnel is derived from airborne droplet size measurements and airborne and deposited liquid volume measurements downwind from the spray nozzle. Measurements of droplet size and deposition data were made in a low-speed wind tunnel using standard reference nozzles. A blank emulsifiable concentration spray was applied at two different wind speeds. The wind tunnel dispersion (WTDISP) model was used to evaluate the drift potentials of each spray using the droplet size and spray flux measured in the wind tunnel. The specific objectives were (1) the evaluation of model accuracy by comparison of modeled downwind deposition to that measured in the wind tunnel, (2) the evaluation of drift reduction potential of the spray nozzles relative to a reference nozzle, and (3) the determination of low-speed wind tunnel data collection requirements for model input to optimize the evaluation process. The modeled deposition data did not compare well to the measured deposition data, but this was expected as the model was not meant to be used for this purpose. The tested nozzles were rated using the International Standards Organization drift classification standard. The drift ratings generally showed trends of larger droplet producing nozzles having greater drift reduction ratings. An examination of several scenarios using reduced model input requirements, which would decrease the low-speed wind tunnel data collection time, did not show any conclusive results. They suggest that further testing and refinement of the data collection process and the WTDISP model may support wider use of this system for the assessment of DRTs.

References

1.
EPA
, Pesticide Registration (PR) Notice 2001-X Draft: Spray and Dust Drift Label Statements for Pesticide Products,
2001
, http://www.epa.gov/PR_Notices/prdraft-spraydrift801.htm (Last accessed August 2009).
2.
Sayles
,
G.
,
Birchfield
,
N.
, and
Ellenberger
,
J.
, “
US EPA’s Research Proposal for Encouraging the Use of Spray Drift Reduction Technologies
,”
Proc. Int. Conf. on Pesticide Application for Drift Management
, Washington State University, Waikoloa, HI,
2004
, pp.
204
209
, http://pep.wsu.edu/drift04/proceedings.html (Last accessed October 2009).
3.
Kosusko
,
M.
,
Bullock
,
K.
,
Birchfield
,
N.
, and
Hewitt
,
A.
, “
Development of a Test Plan to Verify Pesticide Drift Reduction Technologies
,”
Proc. ASABE
, Edmonton, AB Canada,
2006
,
American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers
,
St. Joseph, MI
, Paper No. 061010.
4.
EPA
, Pesticide Spray Drift Reduction Technologies: Verification and Incentives for Use,
2006
, http://www.epa.gov/etop/forum/problem/progressreports/pest-spray-9-15-06.html (Last accessed October 2009).
5.
EPA
, “
Draft Generic Verification Protocol for the Verification of Pesticide Spray Drift Reduction Technologies for Row and Field Crops
,” Report No. EPA/600/R-07/102, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.,
2007
.
6.
Fritz
,
B.K.
,
Hoffmann
,
W.C.
, and
Lan
,
Y.
,
Evaluation of the EPA Drift Reduction Technology (DRT) Low Speed Wind Tunnel Protocol
,”
J. ASTM Int.
 1546-962X, Vol.
6
, No.
4
,
2009
, paper ID JAI102129. https://doi.org/10.1520/JAI102129
7.
Hoffmann
,
W. C.
,
Fritz
,
B. K.
, and
Lan
,
Y.
, “
Evaluation of a Proposed Drift Reduction Technology (DRT) High-Speed Wind Tunnel Testing Protocol
,”
J. ASTM Int.
 1546-962X, Vol.
6
, No.
4
,
2009
, paper ID JAI102122. https://doi.org/10.1520/JAI102122
8.
ASABE S572.1,
2009
, “
Spray Nozzle Classification by Droplet Spectra
,” American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, MI.
9.
Teske
,
M. E.
,
Thistle
,
H. W.
, and
Ice
,
G. G.
, “
Technical Advances in Modeling Aerially Applied Sprays
,”
Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers
, Vol.
46
(
4
),
2003
, pp.
985
996
.
10.
Hewitt
,
A. J.
, “
A Developmental Drift Model for Ground Application Systems
,” unpublished manuscript.
11.
Connell
,
R. J.
,
Hewitt
,
A. J.
,
Wolf
,
T.
, and
Miller
,
P. C. H.
, “
WTDISP—Adapting a Lagrangian Ground Sprayer Model Using Wind Tunnel Data
,”
Proceedings of the 18th World IMACS/MODSIM Congress
, Cairns, Australia,
2009
, pp.
4402
4408
.
12.
Fritz
,
B. K.
and
Hoffmann
,
W. C.
, “
Collection Efficiencies of Various Airborne Spray Flux Samplers Used in Aerial Application Research
,”
J. ASTM Int.
 1546-962X, Vol.
5
, No.
1
,
2008
, paper ID JAI101493. https://doi.org/10.1520/JAI101493
13.
Teske
,
M.
, personal communication,
2009
.
14.
ISO 22369-1:2006(E),
2006
, “
Crop Protection Equipment—Drift Classification of Spraying Equipment—Part 1: Classes
,” International Standards Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.