Abstract

Twelve commercial drift reduction agents were evaluated for their characteristics in the three most commonly accepted parameters for spray droplet size formation—extensional viscosity, dynamic surface tension, and kinematic viscosity. Samples were sprayed in both water and in the presence of a commercial herbicide formulation. The spray droplet spectra for these agents were then determined under rigorous control, in still-air conditions, using a Sympatec HELOS/KF laser diffraction particle size analyzer. Spraying an actual pesticide formulation that contains a wetting agent is important because the surfactant present reduces dynamic surface tension and can significantly reduce spray droplet diameter. The aerosol particle size distributions were measured using an electronic actuator that moved the nozzle spray pattern through the laser in a reproducible manner. There are multiple mechanisms that can influence both volume mean diameter and percent fines below 105 microns. There are natural and synthetic water-soluble polymers that function by increasing extensional viscosity. There are oil products that produce emulsions that keep small spray drops from forming. The droplet spectra for the different commercial products were grouped according to their specific drift reduction mechanism in order to see if a better correlation could be made on how they individually affected the resulting droplet particle size distribution.

References

1.
Hewitt
,
A. J.
, “
The Effect of Tank Mix and Adjuvants on Spray Drift
,”
Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Adjuvants for Agrochemicals
, Memphis, TN,
1998
,
ISAA
,
Wageningen, The Netherlands
, pp.
451
462
.
2.
Hewitt
,
A. J.
,
Miller
,
P. C. H.
,
Dexter
,
R. W.
, and
Bagley
,
W. E.
, “
The Influence of Tank Mix Adjuvants on the Formation, Characteristics and Drift Potential of Agricultural Sprays
,”
Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Adjuvants for Agrochemicals
, Amsterdam, The Netherlands,
2001
,
ISAA
,
Wageningen, The Netherlands
, pp.
547
556
.
3.
Miller
,
P. C. H.
,
Hewitt
,
A. J.
, and
Bagley
,
W. E.
, “
Adjuvant Effects on Spray Characteristics and Drift Potential
,”
Pesticide Formulations and Application Systems: 21st Volume, ASTM STP 1414
,
J. C.
Mueninghoff
,
A. K.
Viets
, and
R. A.
Downer
, Eds.,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
,
2001
, pp.
175
184
.
4.
Hewitt
,
A. J.
,
Stern
,
A. J.
,
Bagley
,
W. E.
, and
Dexter
,
R.
, “
The Formation of a New ASTM E35.22 Task Group to Address Drift Management Adjuvants
,”
Pesticide Formulations and Application Systems: 19th Volume, ASTM STP 1373
,
R. S.
Tann
,
J. D.
Nalewaja
, and
A. K.
Viets
, Eds.,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
,
2001
, pp.
135
148
.
5.
Hewitt
,
A. J.
and
Spray Drift Task Force
, A Summary of Tank Mix and Nozzle Effects on Droplet Size, www.agdrift.com/PDF_FILES/Tankmix.pdf (Last accessed Feb. 18,
2009
).
6.
Hoffmann
,
W. C.
,
Hewitt
,
A. J.
,
Ross
,
J. B.
,
Bagley
,
W. E.
,
Martin
,
D. E.
, and
Fritz
,
B. K.
, “
Spray Adjuvant Effects on Droplet Size Spectra Measured by Three Laser-Based Systems in a High-Speed Wind Tunnel
,”
Pesticide Formulations and Application Systems: 26th Volume, ASTM STP 1478
,
G.
Lindner
,
M.
Salyani
, and
C.
Martin
, Eds.,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
,
2008
, pp.
60
71
.
7.
Fritz
,
B. K.
,
Hoffmann
,
W. C.
, and
Lan
,
Y.
, “
Evaluation of the EPA Drift Reduction Technology (DRT) Low-Speed Wind Tunnel Protocol
,”
Pesticide Formulations and Application Systems: 29th Volume, ASTM STP 1520
,
R.
Zollinger
, Ed.,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
,
2010
.
8.
Hoffmann
,
W. C.
,
Fritz
,
B. K.
, and
Lan
,
Y.
, “
Evaluation of a Proposed Drift Reduction Technology High-Speed Wind Tunnel Protocol
,”
Pesticide Formulations and Application Systems: 29th Volume, ASTM STP 1520
,
R.
Zollinger
, Ed.,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
,
2010
.
9.
ASTM E2408,
2007
, “
Standard Test Method for Relative Extensional Viscosity of Agricultural Spray Tank Mixes
,” Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol.
11.05
, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, pp.
1042
1045
.
10.
ASTM D3825,
2005
, “
Standard Test Method for Dynamic Surface Tension by the Fast-Bubble Technique
,” Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol.
05.02
, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
11.
ASTM E1260,
2010
, “
Standard Test Method for Determining Liquid Drop Size Characteristics in a Spray Using Optical Nonimaging Light-Scattering Instruments
,” Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol.
14.02
, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, pp.
332
335
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.