Abstract

The development and testing of drift reduction technologies (DRTs) have come to the forefront of application research in the past few years in the United States. DRTs can be spray nozzles, sprayer modifications, spray delivery assistance, spray property modifiers (adjuvants), and/or landscape modifications. A protocol for testing DRTs in high speed wind tunnels has been previously reported and was expanded to test spray nozzles. This manuscript reports on the initial implementation of the DRT program for conducting DRT evaluations of three spray nozzles under high speed conditions (i.e.,45–65 m/s (100–140 mph)), which are relevant to the aerial application of crop production and protection materials. The spray nozzles were evaluated in the USDA-Agriculture Research Service High Speed Wind Tunnel facility. The droplet size of each of the nozzles with different airspeeds, spray pressures, and orientation was measured with a Sympatec Helos laser diffraction instrument. The droplet size spectra for each test were input in a spray dispersion model (AGDISP), which calculates the downwind drift expected from a typical aerial application scenario. As compared to the reference nozzle, the three spray nozzles reduced spray drift by 70–84 % as compared to the reference nozzle. The nozzles generated spray droplets with volume median diameters 60–80 μm larger than the reference nozzle. One of the aerial application industry’s best management practices (BMPs) is to not spray directly on the downwind edge of a field. The spray swath near this edge is moved upwind (i.e., offset) by 1/2 to 1 swath width. When this BMP was combined with the drift reductions from the spray nozzles, the amount of drift reduction was slightly increased; however, application efficiencies increased to 93–96 %. These results demonstrate the possibility of combining multiple drift reduction techniques and technologies to greatly reduce spray drift.

References

1.
Sayles
,
G.
,
Birchfield
,
N.
, and
Ellenberger
,
J.
, “
US EPA’s Research Proposal for Encouraging the Use of Spray Drift Reduction Technologies
,”
Proceedings of the International Conference on Pesticide Application for Drift Management
, Waikaloa, HI, October 27–29,
2006
,
Washington State University
, pp.
204
209
, http://pep.wsu.edu/drift04/proceedings.html (Last accessed July 25, 2010).
2.
EPA
, ‘‘
Pesticide Drift Reduction Technology
,’’
2006
, http://www.epa.gov/etv/pubs/600etv06013.pdf (Last accessed July 25, 2010).
3.
EPA
, “
Environmental Technology Verification Program, Quality Management Plan
,” EPA Publication No. EPA/600/R-03/021, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC,
2002
.
4.
Kosusko
,
M.
,
Bullock
,
K.
,
Birchfield
,
N.
, and
Hewitt
,
A. J.
, “
Development of a Test Plan to Verify Pesticide Drift Reduction Technologies
,”
ASABE Annual International Meeting
, Sacramento, CA,
2006
,
Am. Soc. Agri. Bio. Eng.
,
St. Joseph, MI
.
5.
Dumbauld
,
R. K.
,
Bjorklund
,
J. R.
, and
S. F. Saterlie
,
S.F.
, “
Computer Model for Predicting Aircraft Spray Dispersion and Deposition Above and Within Forest Canopies: Users Manual for the FSCBG Computer Program
,” Report 80-11, USDA Forest Service, Davis, CA,
1980
.
6.
Mokeba
,
M. L.
,
Salt
,
D. W.
,
Lee
,
B. E.
, and
Ford
,
M. G.
, “
Computer Modeling of the Meteorological and Spraying Parameters that Influence the Aerial Dispersion of Agrochemical Sprays
,”
Int. J. Biometeorol
 0020-1728, Vol.
41
,
1998
, pp.
194
199
. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004840050074
7.
Bilanin
,
A. J.
,
Teske
,
M. E.
,
Barry
,
J. W.
, and
Eckblad
,
R. B.
, “
AGDISP: The Aircraft Spray Dispersion Model, Code Development and Experimental Validation
,”
Trans. ASAE
 0001-2351, Vol.
32
,
1989
, pp.
327
334
.
8.
Teske
,
M. E.
,
Thistle
,
H. W.
, and
Ice
,
G. G.
, “
Technical Advances in Modeling Aerially Applied Sprays
,”
Trans. ASAE
 0001-2351, Vol.
46
,
2003
, pp.
985
996
.
9.
Teske
,
M. E.
and
Thistle
,
H. W.
, “
A Simulation of Release Height and Wind Speed Effects for Drift Minimization
,”
Trans. ASAE
 0001-2351, Vol.
42
,
1999
, pp.
583
591
.
10.
Teske
,
M. E.
,
Thistle
,
H. W.
, and
Mickle
,
R. E.
, “
Modeling Finer Droplet Aerial Spray Drift and Deposition
,”
Appl. Eng. Agric.
 0883-8542, Vol.
16
,
2000
, pp.
351
357
.
11.
Hoffmann
,
W. C.
, “
Field-Collected and AGDISP-Predicted Spray Flux from an Aerial Application
,”
J. ASTM Int.
 1546-962X, Vol.
3
,
2006
, pp.
1
12
. https://doi.org/10.1520/JAI12908
12.
DuPont Crop Protect
, Aerial Applications: Best Management Practices, 1996, http://www2.dupont.com/Production_Agriculture/en_US/assets/downloads/pdfs/K-14978.pdf (Last accessed, July 25,
2009
).
13.
14.
ASTM E361-01,
2005
, “
Standard Methods for Testing Hydraulics Spray Nozzles Used in Agriculture
,” Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol.
11-05
, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, pp.
1
6
.
15.
ASAE S572,
1999
, “
Spray Nozzle Classification by Droplet Spectra
,” American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, MI.
16.
ASBE S561.1,
2004
, “
Procedure for Measuring Drift Deposits from Ground, Orchard, and Aerial Sprayers
,” American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, MI.
17.
Fritz
,
B. K.
,
Hoffmann
,
W. C.
, and
Lan
,
Y.
, “
Evaluation of the EPA Drift Reduction Technology (DRT) Low Speed Wind Tunnel Protocol
,”
J. ASTM Int.
 1546-962X, Vol.
6
, No.
4
,
2009
, Paper ID JAI102129, 11 p. https://doi.org/10.1520/JAI102129
18.
Hoffmann
,
W. C.
,
Fritz
,
B. K.
, and
Lan
,
Y.
, “
Evaluation of a Proposed Drift Reduction Technology (DRT) High-Speed Wind Tunnel Testing Protocol
,”
J. ASTM Int.
 1546-962X, Vol.
6
, No.
4
,
2009
, Paper ID JAI102122, 10 p. https://doi.org/10.1520/JAI102122
19.
Bird
,
S. L.
,
Perry
,
S. G.
,
Ray
,
S. L.
, and
Teske
,
M. E.
, “
Evaluation of the AgDISP Aerial Spray Algorithms in the AgDrift Model
,”
Envir. Toxicol. Chem.
 0730-7268, Vol.
21
,
2002
, pp.
672
681
. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620210328
20.
Hoffmann
,
W. C.
,
Walker
,
T. W.
,
Smith
,
V. L.
,
Martin
,
D. E.
, and
Fritz
,
B. K.
, “
Droplet-Size Characterization of Handheld Atomization Equipment Typically Used in Vector Control
,”
J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc.
 8756-971X, Vol.
23
,
2007
, pp.
315
320
. https://doi.org/10.2987/8756-971X(2007)23[315:DCOHAE]2.0.CO;2
21.
Hoffmann
,
W. C.
,
Walker
,
T. W.
,
Martin
,
D. E.
,
Barber
,
J. A. B.
,
Gwinn
,
T.
,
Smith
,
V. L.
,
Szumlas
,
D.
,
Lan
,
L.
, and
Fritz
,
B. K.
, “
Characterization of Truck-Mounted Atomization Equipment Used in Vector Control
,”
J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc.
 8756-971X, Vol.
23
,
2007
, pp.
321
329
. https://doi.org/10.2987/8756-971X(2007)23[321:COTAET]2.0.CO;2
22.
ASTM E1260-05,
2005
, “
Standard Test Method for Determining Liquid Drop Size Characteristics in a Spray Using Optical Nonimaging Light-Scattering Instruments
,” Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol.
14-02
, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, pp.
1
4
.
23.
Gilbert
,
A. J.
, “
Local Environmental Risk Assessment for Pesticides (LERAP) in the UK
,”
Aspects of Applied Biology
, Vol.
57
,
2000
, pp.
83
90
.
24.
Hewitt
,
A. J.
, “
Developments in International Harmonization of Pesticide Drift Management
,”
Phytoparasitica
, Vol.
29
, No.
2
,
2001
, pp.
93
96
. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02983952
25.
ISO 22369-1:2006(E),
2006
, “
Crop Protection Equipment—Drift Classification of Spraying Equipment—Part 1 Classes
,” International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.