Abstract

Advancements in both application hardware (e.g., nozzles and spray assist devices) and spray property modification products have led to a number of products that are specifically designed to maximize the on-target deposition and minimize off-target movement of spray droplets. Testing protocols are being developed to objectively measure spray drift reduction from a wide range of drift reduction technologies (DRTs) including spray nozzles, sprayer modifications, spray delivery assistance, spray property modifiers (adjuvants), and/or landscape modifications. Using a DRT evaluation protocol, the objectives of this work were to study the effects of different air speeds on droplet size from different spray nozzles and spray solutions and to further evaluate the effects of differences in liquid and air temperature on droplet size at the different air speeds tested. Measured spray droplet size was significantly affected by changes in airspeed with the DV0.5 increasing by ∼30–100 μm and the percent of spray volume less than 200 μm decreasing by 50 % or more as the tunnel airspeed was increased from 0.5 to 6.7 m/s (1 to 15 miles per hour), depending on the spray solution, spray nozzle, and air speed. The data also showed a lesser influence of temperature differential between the spray solution and ambient air, with the differences seen most likely resulting from changes in spray solution physical properties with the changes in liquid temperature. Most importantly, this study demonstrated that a reference nozzle evaluated under the same conditions resulted in the reduction in driftable fines while the DRT remained constant across all conditions tested.

References

1.
Boxall
,
A. B. A.
,
Hardy
,
A.
,
Beulke
,
S.
,
Boucard
,
T.
,
Burgin
,
L.
,
Falloon
,
P. D.
,
Haygarth
,
P. M.
,
Hutchinson
,
T.
,
Kovats
,
R. S.
,
Leonardi
,
G.
,
Levy
,
L. S.
,
Nichols
,
G.
,
Parsons
,
S. A.
,
Potts
,
L.
,
Stone
,
D.
,
Topp
,
E.
,
Turley
,
D. B.
,
Walsh
,
K.
,
Wellington
,
E. M. H.
, and
Williams
,
R. J.
, “
Impact of Climate Change on Indirect Human Exposure to Pathogens and Chemicals from Agriculture
,”
Environ. Health Perspect.
 0091-6765, Vol.
117
(
4
),
2009
, pp.
508
514
.
2.
Sayles
,
G.
,
Birchfield
,
N.
, and
Ellenberger
,
J.
, “
US EPA’s Research Proposal for Encouraging the Use of Spray Drift Reduction Technologies
,”
Proceedings of the International Conference on Pesticide Application for Drift Management
, Waikoloa, HI, October 27–29, 2005,
Washington State University
,
Spokane, WA
, pp.
204
209
, http://pep.wsu.edu/drift04/proceedings.html.
3.
2006
EPA
, Pesticide Spray Drift Reduction Technologies: Verification and Incentives for Use, http://www.epa.gov/etop/forum/problem/progressreports/pest-spray-9-15-06.html (Last accessed April 22, 2011).
4.
Fritz
,
B. K.
,
Hoffmann
,
W. C.
,
Farooq
,
M.
,
Walker
,
T. W.
, and
Bonds
,
J. A. S.
, “
Filtration Effects Due to Bioassay Cage Design and Screen Type
,”
J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc.
 8756-971X, Vol.
26
(
4
),
2010
, pp.
411
421
. https://doi.org/10.2987/10-6031.1
5.
Hoffmann
,
W. C.
,
Fritz
,
B. K.
, and
Lan
,
Y.
, “
Evaluation of a Proposed Drift Reduction Technology (DRT) High-Speed Wind Tunnel Testing Protocol
,”
J. ASTM Int.
 1546-962X, Vol.
6
(
4
),
2009
, pp.
1
10
. https://doi.org/10.1520/JAI102122
6.
Fritz
,
B. K.
,
Hoffmann
,
W. C.
,
Birchfield
,
N. B.
,
Ellenberger
,
J.
,
Kan
,
F.
,
Bagley
,
W. E.
,
Thornburg
,
J. W.
, and
Hewitt
,
A. J.
, “
Evaluation of Spray Drift Using Low-Speed Wind Tunnel Measurements and Dispersion Modeling
,”
J. ASTM Int.
 1546-962X, Vol.
7
(
6
);
2010
, pp.
1
14
. https://doi.org/10.1520/JAI102775
7.
Hoffmann
,
W. C.
,
Fritz
,
B. K.
,
Thornburg
,
J. W.
,
Bagley
,
W. E.
,
Birchfield
,
N. B.
, and
Ellenberger
,
J.
, “
Spray Drift Reduction Evaluations of Spray Nozzles Using a Standardized Testing Protocol
,”
J. ASTM Int.
 1546-962X, Vol.
7
(
8
),
2010
, pp.
1
8
. https://doi.org/10.1520/JAI102820
8.
EPA
, “
Environmental Technology Verification Program, Quality Management Plan
,” EPA Publication No. EPA/600/R-03/021, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C,
2002
.
9.
Kosusko
,
M.
,
Bullock
,
K.
,
Birchfield
,
N.
, and
Hewitt
,
A. J.
, “
Development of a Test Plan to Verify Pesticide Drift Reduction Technologies
,”
ASABE Annual International Meeting
, Sacramento, CA, Am. Soc. Agri. Bio. Eng., St. Joseph, MI,
2006
.
10.
EPA
, “
Draft Generic Verification Protocol for the Verification of Pesticide Spray Drift Reduction Technologies for Row and Field Crops
,” Report No. EPA/600/R-07/102, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.,
2007
.
11.
ASTM E2798-11,
2011
, “
Standard Test Method for Characterization of Performance of Spray Drift Reduction Adjuvants for Ground Application
,” Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol.
11.05
, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, pp.
1
10
.
12.
Giles
,
D. K.
,
Young
,
B. W.
,
Alexander
,
P. R.
, and
French
,
H. M.
, “
Intermittent Control of Liquid Flow from Fan Nozzles in Concurrent Air Streams: Wind Tunnel Studies of Droplet Size Effects
,”
J. Agric. Eng. Res.
 0021-8634 Vol.
62
,
1995
, pp.
77
84
. https://doi.org/10.1006/jaer.1995.1066
13.
ASTM 1260-03,
2009
, “
Standard Test Method for Determining Liquid Drop Size Characteristics in a Spray Using Optical Nonimaging Light-Scattering Instruments
,” Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol.
14.02
, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, pp.
1
6
.
14.
Miller
,
P. C. H.
and
Tuck
,
C. R.
, “
Factors Influencing the Performance of Spray Delivery Systems: A Review of Recent Developments
,”
J. ASTM Int.
 1546-962X, Vol.
2
(
6
),
2005
. https://doi.org/10.1520/JAI12900
15.
Parkin
,
C. S.
, “
Factors Influencing the Variability of Spray Nozzle Performance
,” Report to Defra. Ref. PA 1731, Silsoe SPray Application Unit, Silsoe, England,
2003
.
16.
ASTM E361-01,
2005
, “
Standard Methods for Testing Hydraulics Spray Nozzles Used in Agriculture
,” Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol.
11.05
, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, pp.
1
6
.
17.
ASTM
,
Spray Nozzle Classification by Droplet Spectra
,
American Society of Agricultural Engineers
,
St. Joseph, MI
,
1999
.
18.
ASTM E1260-05:
2005
, “
Standard Test Method for Determining Liquid Drop Size Characteristics in a Spray Using Optical Nonimaging Light-Scattering Instruments
,” Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol.
11.05
, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, pp.
1
5
.
19.
Downer
,
R. A.
,
Hall
,
F. R.
,
Thompson
,
R. S.
, and
Chapple
,
A. C.
, “
Temperature Effects on Atomization by Flat-Fan Nozzles: Implications for Drift Management and Evidence for Surfactant Concentration Gradients
,”
Atomization Sprays
 1044-5110, Vol.
3
,
1998
, pp.
241
255
.
20.
Dodge
,
L. G.
,
Rhodes
,
D. J.
, and
Reitz
,
R. D.
, “
Drop-size Measurement Techniques for Sprays: Comparison of Malvern Laser-Diffraction and Aeromatics Phase/Doppler
,”
Appl. Opt.
 0003-6935, Vol.
26
,
1987
, pp.
2144
2154
. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.26.002144
21.
Gülder
,
Ö. L.
, “
Multiple Scattering Effects in Dense Spray Sizing by Laser Diffraction
,”
Aerosol Sci. Technol.
 0278-6826, Vol.
12
(
3
),
1990
, pp.
570
577
. https://doi.org/10.1080/02786829008959371
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.