Abstract

The current American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials standard on crushed concrete in base applications (M 319-02) allows up to 5 % brick by mass, and more with the approval of the engineer; however, in some regions the brick content may be greater than 10 %. More than 41 states allow the use of crushed concrete in highway applications, but only a handful allow the use of building derived concrete (BDC) or mixed stream crushed concrete. Barriers to increasing the appropriate use of BDC in highway applications include a lack of data comparing BDC properties and performance to natural aggregates, as well as data that pavement engineers can use for design. This research has focused on characterizing BDC that was screened to meet New Hampshire Department of Transportation specifications. The gradation, optimum water content, unit weight, and resilient modulus were measured for the BDC and for the control materials, which were a crushed stone and a sand. The resilient modulus was measured using both a laboratory triaxial cell, and a light falling weight deflectometer (LWD) in a test pit. The resilient modulus of the BDC exceeded that of the control materials as measured in the laboratory and using the LWD. In addition, the laboratory resilient modulus showed good correlation with the LWD stiffness. These results suggest that BDC would perform as well as natural aggregates in base course applications.

References

1.
Federal Highway Administration
, “
Transportation Applications Of Recycled Concrete Aggregate: FHWA State of the Practice National Review
,” Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.,
2004
.
2.
AASHTO Standard M319, “
Standard Specification for Reclaimed Concrete Aggregate for Unbound Soil-Aggregate Base Course
,” Standard Specifications for Transportation Materials and Methods of Sampling and Testing, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C.,
2009
.
3.
Recycled Materials Resource Center
, “
Survey of State Transportation Organizations
,” Univ. of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, unpublished.
4.
Sandler
,
K.
, “
Analyzing What’s Recyclable in C&D Debris
,” BioCycle, Nov
2003
, pp. 51–54.
5.
Tepordei
,
V.
,
U.S. Geological Survey Minerals Yearbook—Stone, Crushed
,
US Geological Survey
,
Washington, DC
, p.
71
18
,
2003
.
6.
Lyons
,
J. B.
,
Bothner
,
W. A.
,
Moench
,
R. H.
, and
Thompson
,
J. B.
,
Bedrock Geologic Map of New Hampshire
,
U.S. Dept. of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey
,
Washington, D.C.
,
1997
.
7.
AASHTO Standard T99, “
Standard Method of Test for Moisture-Density Relations of Soils Using a 2.5-kg (5.5-lb) Rammer and a 305-mm (12-in.) Drop
,” Standard Specifications for Transportation Materials and Methods of Sampling and Testing, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C.,
2010
.
8.
AASHTO T191, “
Standard Method of Test for Density of Soil In-Place by the Sand-Cone Method
,” Standard Specifications for Transportation Materials and Methods of Sampling and Testing, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C.,
2010
.
9.
AASHTO T 193, “
Standard Method of Test for the California Bearing Ratio
,” Standard Specifications for Transportation Materials and Methods of Sampling and Testing, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C.,
2010
.
10.
DeRocchi
,
M. J.
,
2008
, “
Recycled Construction and Demolition Debris Materials in Roadway Base/Subbase Applications
,” M.S. thesis
Civil Engineering, Univ. of New Hampshire
, Durham, NH.
11.
AASHTO T307, “
Standard Method of Test for Determining the Resilient Modulus of Soils and Aggregate Materials
,” Standard Specifications for Transportation Materials and Methods of Sampling and Testing, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C.,
2010
.
12.
Mohammad
,
L. N.
,
Herath
,
A.
,
Gudishala
,
R.
,
Munir
D.
,
Nazzal
,
P.
,
Abu-Farsakh
,
M. Y.
, and
Alshibli
,
K.
, “
Development of Models to Estimate the Subgrade and Subbase Layers’ Resilient Modulus from in Situ Devices Test Results for Construction Control
,” Louisiana Transportation Research Center, Baton Rouge, LA,
2008
.
13.
White
,
D.
,
Thompson
,
M.
, and
Vennapusa
,
P.
, “
Field Validation of Intelligent Compaction Monitoring Technology for Unbound Materials
,” Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, Center for Transportation Research and Education; and Minnesota Dept. of Transportation, St. Paul, MN,
2007
.
14.
Vennapusa
,
P. K.
, and
White
,
D. J.
Comparison of Light Weight Deflectometer Measurements for Pavement Foundation Materials
,”
Geotechnical Test. J.
Vol.
32
, No. 3,
2009
, pp.
239
25
.
15.
Rada
,
G.
, and
Witczak
,
M. W.
, “
Comprehensive Evaluation of Laboratory Resilient Moduli Results for Granular Material
,”
Transp. Res. Rec.
, Vol.
810
,
1981
, pp.
23
33
.
16.
Stolle
,
D.
,
Guo
,
P.
, and
Liu
,
Y.
, “
Resilient Modulus Properties of Granular Highway Materials
,”
Can. J. Civ. Eng.
, Vol.
36
, No. 4,
2009
, pp.
639
654
. https://doi.org/10.1139/L08-141
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.