Abstract

Bent glass has garnered increased interest on the part of architects for the realization of curved glass façades. As one method of bending of glass façade units, cold bending is an economically efficient procedure for manufacturing; however, it introduces permanent stresses in the glazing structure, especially in the corner zones of the glass units for warped designs. In a similar manner, high stresses in the corner zones are also generated in general by constant surface loads acting on the panes of the glass unit, which can be explained by thin plate theory. Thus it can be expected that these unsteady loads, e.g., evoked by wind and/or snow loads, unfavorably interfere with the permanent stresses in the adhesives of both the structural glazing sealant and the insulating glass sealant from a durability point of view. The existence of these corner loads is not adequately accounted for by the ETAG 002 guideline for structural glazing applications, which postulates a trapezoidal load distribution in the bonding with diminishing stresses in the corner zones. This paper presents numerical results of a parametric study of pressure-loaded glass units, with a focus on corner loads and stresses. The results show that the stress levels in the corner zones might be significantly higher than the design stress values used for sizing the bonding.

References

1.
European Organization for Technical Approvals (EOTA),
1999
, “
Guideline for European Technical Approval for Structural Sealant Glazing System (SSGS)—Part 1 Supported and Unsupported Systems
,” EOTA Recommendation ETAG 002, Brussels, Belgium.
2.
Vallabhan
,
C. V. G.
and
Chou
,
G. D.
, “
Sealant Stresses in Structural Glazing: A Mathematical Model
,”
Building Sealants: Material Properties and Performance
, ASTM STP 1069,
T. F.
O’Connor
, Ed.,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
, pp.
22
41
.
3.
Krueger
,
G.
,
Voelkel
,
G. E.
, and
Wohlfahrt
,
R.
, “
Loading Investigation in the Adhesive Joint of a Structural-Glazing-Element
,” Research Report T 2492,
IRB Verlag, FMPA Stuttgart
, Germany,
1992
.
4.
Blaauwendraad
,
J.
, “
Plates and FEM—Surprises and Pitfalls
,”
Solid Mechanics and its Applications
, Vol.
171
,
Springer
,
Dordrecht, Germany
,
2010
.
5.
Czerny
,
F.
, “
Tables for Rectangular Plates
,” Betonkalender, Ernst & Sohn,
1987
, pp.
311
373
.
6.
Stiglat
,
K.
and
Wippel
,
H.
, “
Massive Plates, Selected Chapter for Internal Force Determination and Sizing
,”
Betonkalender
,
Ernst & Sohn
,
Berlin, Germany
,
1992
, pp.
287
366
.
7.
Hagl
,
A.
, “
Bonding in Glass Construction
,”
Stahlbaukalender
,
U.
Kuhlmann
, Ed.,
Ernst & Sohn
,
Berlin, Germany
,
2005
, pp.
819
861
.
8.
Hagl
,
A.
, “
Review of ETAG 002 Guideline with Focus on Glass Unit Corner Loading
,”
Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on the Application of Architectural Glass
,
Munich
, October 4–5,
2010
,
University of the Armed Forces
,
Neubiberg, Germany
, pp.
45
54
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.