A reliable prediction of three-dimensional (3D) protein structures from sequence data remains a big challenge due to both theoretical and computational difficulties. We have previously shown that our kinetostatic compliance method (KCM) implemented into the Protofold package can overcome some of the key difficulties faced by other de novo structure prediction methods, such as the very small time steps required by the molecular dynamics (MD) approaches or the very large number of samples needed by the Monte Carlo (MC) sampling techniques. In this paper, we improve the free energy formulation used in Protofold by including the typically underrated entropic effects, imparted due to differences in hydrophobicity of the chemical groups, which dominate the folding of most water-soluble proteins. In addition to the model enhancement, we revisit the numerical implementation by redesigning the algorithms and introducing efficient data structures that reduce the expected complexity from quadratic to linear. Moreover, we develop and optimize parallel implementations of the algorithms on both central and graphics processing units (CPU/GPU) achieving speed-ups up to two orders of magnitude on the GPU. Our simulations are consistent with the general behavior observed in the folding process in aqueous solvent, confirming the effectiveness of model improvements. We report on the folding process at multiple levels, namely, the formation of secondary structural elements and tertiary interactions between secondary elements or across larger domains. We also observe significant enhancements in running times that make the folding simulation tractable for large molecules.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
August 2015
Research-Article
Protofold II: Enhanced Model and Implementation for Kinetostatic Protein Folding1
Pouya Tavousi,
Pouya Tavousi
Kinematics Design Laboratory,
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Connecticut,
Storrs, CT 06269
e-mail: pouya.tavousi@engr.uconn.edu
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Connecticut,
Storrs, CT 06269
e-mail: pouya.tavousi@engr.uconn.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Morad Behandish,
Morad Behandish
Computational Design Laboratory,
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Connecticut,
Storrs, CT 06269
e-mail: m.behandish@engr.uconn.edu
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Connecticut,
Storrs, CT 06269
e-mail: m.behandish@engr.uconn.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Horea T. Ilieş,
Horea T. Ilieş
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Connecticut,
Storrs, CT 06269
e-mail: ilies@engr.uconn.edu
University of Connecticut,
Storrs, CT 06269
e-mail: ilies@engr.uconn.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Kazem Kazerounian
Kazem Kazerounian
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Connecticut,
Storrs, CT 06269
e-mail: kazem@engr.uconn.edu
University of Connecticut,
Storrs, CT 06269
e-mail: kazem@engr.uconn.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Pouya Tavousi
Kinematics Design Laboratory,
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Connecticut,
Storrs, CT 06269
e-mail: pouya.tavousi@engr.uconn.edu
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Connecticut,
Storrs, CT 06269
e-mail: pouya.tavousi@engr.uconn.edu
Morad Behandish
Computational Design Laboratory,
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Connecticut,
Storrs, CT 06269
e-mail: m.behandish@engr.uconn.edu
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Connecticut,
Storrs, CT 06269
e-mail: m.behandish@engr.uconn.edu
Horea T. Ilieş
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Connecticut,
Storrs, CT 06269
e-mail: ilies@engr.uconn.edu
University of Connecticut,
Storrs, CT 06269
e-mail: ilies@engr.uconn.edu
Kazem Kazerounian
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Connecticut,
Storrs, CT 06269
e-mail: kazem@engr.uconn.edu
University of Connecticut,
Storrs, CT 06269
e-mail: kazem@engr.uconn.edu
Manuscript received September 8, 2015; final manuscript received January 29, 2016; published online March 22, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Abraham Quan Wang.
J. Nanotechnol. Eng. Med. Aug 2015, 6(3): 034601 (24 pages)
Published Online: March 22, 2016
Article history
Received:
September 8, 2015
Revised:
January 29, 2016
Citation
Tavousi, P., Behandish, M., Ilieş, H. T., and Kazerounian, K. (March 22, 2016). "Protofold II: Enhanced Model and Implementation for Kinetostatic Protein Folding." ASME. J. Nanotechnol. Eng. Med. August 2015; 6(3): 034601. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4032759
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
DNA-Based Bulk Hydrogel Materials and Biomedical Application
J. Nanotechnol. Eng. Med (November 2015)
Transient Low-Temperature Effects on Propidium Iodide Uptake in Lance Array Nanoinjected HeLa Cells
J. Nanotechnol. Eng. Med (November 2015)
Engineering Embryonic Stem Cell Microenvironments for Tailored Cellular Differentiation
J. Nanotechnol. Eng. Med (November 2015)
Related Articles
From Mechanisms and Robotics to Protein Conformation and Drug Design
J. Mech. Des (January,2004)
On Centrioles, Microtubules, and Cellular Electromagnetism
J. Nanotechnol. Eng. Med (August,2014)
Protofold: A Successive Kinetostatic Compliance Method for Protein Conformation Prediction
J. Mech. Des (July,2005)
Development of a Nanoparticle-Embedded Chitosan Sponge for Topical and Local Administration of Chemotherapeutic Agents
J. Nanotechnol. Eng. Med (November,2014)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Conclusions
Biocompatible Nanomaterials for Targeted and Controlled Delivery of Biomacromolecules
Introduction
Bacteriophage T4 Tail Fibers as a Basis for Structured Assemblies
Chitosan-Based Drug Delivery Systems
Chitosan and Its Derivatives as Promising Drug Delivery Carriers