The objective of this wind-tunnel test was to verify the predictions of the Eppler Airfoil Design and Analysis Code for a very thick airfoil having a high maximum lift coefficient designed to be largely insensitive to leading-edge roughness effects. The 24 percent thick S814 airfoil was designed with these characteristics to accommodate aerodynamic and structural considerations for the root region of a wind-turbine blade. In addition, the airfoil’s maximum lift-to-drag ratio was designed to occur at a high lift coefficient. To accomplish the objective, a two-dimensional wind tunnel test of the S814 thick root airfoil was conducted in January 1994 in the low-turbulence wind tunnel of the Delft University of Technology Low Speed Laboratory, The Netherlands. Data were obtained with transition free and transition fixed for Reynolds numbers of 0.7, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, and 3.0 × 106. For the design Reynolds number of 1.5 × 106, the maximum lift coefficient with transition free is 1.32, which satisfies the design specification. However, this value is significantly lower than the predicted maximum lift coefficient of almost 1.6. With transition fixed at the leading edge, the maximum lift coefficient is 1.22. The small difference in maximum lift coefficient between the transition-free and transition-fixed conditions demonstrates the airfoil’s minimal sensitivity to roughness effects. The S814 root airfoil was designed to complement existing NREL low maximum-lift-coefficient tip-region airfoils for rotor blades 10 to 15 meters in length.

Issue Section:
Research Papers
Topics:
Airfoils, Wind tunnels, Design, Blades, Reynolds number, Surface roughness, Drag (Fluid dynamics), Rotors, Turbulence, Wind turbines
1.
Abbott, I. H., Von Doenhoff, A. E., and Stivers, L. S., Jr., 1945, “Summary of Airfoil Data,” NACA Rep. 824, (Supersedes NACA WR L-560).
2.
Braslow, Albert L., at al., 1958, “Simplified Method for Determination of Critical Height of Distributed Roughness Particles for Boundary-Layer Transition at Mach Numbers From 0 to 5,” NACA TN 4363.
3.
Eppler, R., 1993, “Airfoil Program System. User’s Guide,” R. Eppler.
4.
Quast, A., 1987, “Detection of Transition by Infrared Image Technique,” ICIASF’87 Record, pp. 125–133.
5.
Somers, Dan M., 1988, “Design and Experimental Results for the S805 Airfoil,” (available from NREL).
6.
Somers, Dan M., 1989, “Design and Experimental Results for the S809 Airfoil,” (available from NREL).
7.
Somers, Dan M., 1992, “The S814 and S815 Airfoil,” (available from NREL).
8.
Somers, Dan M., 1994, “Design and Experimental Results for the S814 Airfoil,” (available from NREL).
9.
Tangler, J. L., et al., 1990, “Atmospheric Performance of the Special-Purpose SERI Thin-Airfoil Family: Final Results,” European Wind Energy Conference, Madrid, Spain.
This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright © 1996
 by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
You do not currently have access to this content.