This paper presents a quantitative analysis of the fatigue loads in a down wind, yaw-controlled, fixed pitch, two-bladed teetered-rotor wind turbine using proportional-integral, full-state optimal, and fuzzy logic controllers. Time-domain simulation data is generated using the EASY5x/WT software developed at the University of Texas at El Paso. The simulation data reveal that the choice of controller type, or the controller dynamics, can play a very important role in the fatigue life of a wind turbine and should be considered early in the design process of the wind turbine. In summary, the fuzzy logic controller is the most robust controller under a wide regime of wind conditions. It provides the best overall performance in terms of power regulation capability and minimum fatigue loads. The optimal controller with a full-state Kalman filter observer provides a satisfactory performance interms of power regulation capability and loads when the operating condition is close to the design point at which the controller was optimized. It fails to regulate the power output when the actual operating point deviated too far, about 30 percent in our computer simulations, from the designed operating point. The PI controller provided satisfactory performance in power regulation. However, it produced the worst fatigue loads to the wind turbine among the three controllers.

Issue Section:
Research Papers
Topics:
Fatigue, Rotors, Stress, Wind turbines, Control equipment, Design, Fuzzy logic, Simulation, Wind, Computer simulation, Computer software, Dynamics (Mechanics), Fatigue life, Kalman filters, Yaw
1.
Bannantine, J. A., Comer, J. J., and Handrock, J. L., 1990, Fundamentals of Metal Fatigue Analysis, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
2.
Craver, W. L., and Swift, A. H. P., 1991, “Evaluation of the Design Code, ‘TEETER’ for a Two-Bladed Teetered Rotor Using Mod-2 Wind Tunnel Data,” SED-Vol. 11, Wind Energy–1991, ASME, New York, pp. 35–40.
3.
Franklin, G. F., Powell, J. D., and Workman, M. L., 1990, Digital Control of Dynamic Systems, Addison-Wesley.
4.
Friedland, B., 1996, Advanced Control System Design, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, in press.
5.
Klir, G. J., and Yuan, B., 1995, Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic: Theory and Applications, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 11–19.
6.
Kosko, B., 1992, Neural Networks and Fuzzy Systems, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
7.
Leith, D. J., and Leithead, W. E., 1994, “Comparison of Various Control Strategies for a 2-Bladed Wind Turbine,” Proceedings of the 1994 16th BWEA Energy Conference.
8.
Swift, A. H. P., Craver, W. L., Wu, K. C., and Herrera, J. M., 1993, “A Versatile Teetered-Rotor Test Bed Development and Test Results,” Proceedings of the American Wind Energy Association Conference, July.
9.
Swift, A. H. P., Moroz, E. M., and Craver, W. L., 1995, “The Effect of δ3, Angle on the Teeter Response of An Unstalled Wind Turbine Rotor Determined By Analysis, Experiment, and Computer Simulation,” SED-Vol. 16, Wind Energy–1995, ASME, New York, pp. 217–226.
10.
Wu, K. C., and De La Guardia, R., 1995, “Control Design for Teetered Rotor Wind Turbines Using Easy5x Engineering Analysis Tool,” SED-Vol. 16, Wind Energy–1995, ASME, New York, pp. 243–250.
11.
Wu, K. C, 1996, “Fuzzy Interval Control of Mobile Robots,” Journal of Computers in Electrical Engineering, accepted for publication.
This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright © 1996
 by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
You do not currently have access to this content.