Abstract

Resilient modulus (MR), which properly characterizes the load-deformation response of pavement materials under traffic loading, is evaluated. The MR variations due to three different gradations and three different moisture contents were investigated for Richard Spur (RS) aggregate, which is commonly used in Oklahoma as the base material of roadway pavements. The three gradations selected are finer limit, median, and coarser limit, as specified by the Oklahoma Department of Transportation (ODOT) for Type A aggregate. The three moisture contents selected are optimum moisture content (OMC), 2% below and 2% above the OMC. Six duplicate MR tests under identical conditions were conducted for each case by using the AASHTO designation T 294-94. The variabilities of MR values due to the three different gradations and three different moisture contents were found to be within 10 to 50% and 10 to 20%, respectively. Furthermore, the material model coefficients K1 and K2 were calculated, and a multiple linear regression model for predicting the MR values of the aggregate was established in this study. Finally, the effect of MR variation on pavement performance was demonstrated by using one pavement design example.

References

1.
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
,
AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement Structures
,
AASHTO
,
Washington, DC
,
1993
.
2.
Raad
,
L.
,
Minassian
,
G. H.
, and
Gartin
,
S.
, “
Characterization of Saturated Granular Bases Under Repeated Loads
,”
Transportation Research Record
No. 1369,
Transportation Research Board
,
Washington, DC
,
1992
, pp.
73
-
82
.
3.
Rada
,
C.
and
Witczak
,
W. M.
, “
Comprehensive Evaluation of Laboratory Resilient Moduli Results for Granular Material
,”
Transportation Research Record
No. 810,
Transportation Research Board
,
Washington, DC
,
1981
, pp.
23
-
33
.
4.
Zaman
,
M. M.
,
Chen
,
D. H.
, and
Laguros
,
J. G.
, “
Resilient Moduli of Granular Materials
,”
Journal of Transportation Engineering ASCE
, Vol.
120
, No.
6
,
1994
, pp.
967
-
988
.
5.
Thompson
,
M. R.
and
Smith
,
K. L.
, “
Repeated Triaxial Characterization of Granular Bases
,”
Transportation Research Record
No. 1278,
Transportation Research Board
,
Washington, DC
,
1990
, pp.
7
-
17
.
6.
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
, AASHTO Designation T 294-921, “
Interim Method of Test for Resilient Modulus of Unbound Granular Base/Subbase Materials and Subgrade Soils
,”
AASHTO
,
Washington, DC
,
1992
.
7.
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
, AASHTO Designation T 274-82, “
Suggested Method of Test for Resilient Modulus of Subgrade Soils
,”
AASHTO
,
Washington, DC
,
1986
.
8.
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
, AASHTO Designation T 292-911, “
Interim Method of Test for Resilient Modulus of Subgrade Soils and Untreated Base/Subbase Materials
,”
AASHTO
,
Washington, DC
,
1991
.
9.
Mohammad
,
L. N.
,
Puppala
,
A. J.
, and
Alavilli
,
P.
, “
Influence of Testing Procedure and LVDT Location on Resilient Modulus of Soils
,”
Transportation Research Record
No. 1462,
Transportation Research Board
,
Washington, DC
,
1994
, pp.
91
-
101
.
10.
Chen
,
D. H.
,
Zaman
,
M. M.
, and
Laguros
,
J. G.
, “
Resilient Moduli of Aggregate Materials: Variability due to Testing Procedure and Aggregate Type
,”
Transportation Research Record
No. 1462,
Transportation Research Board
,
Washington, DC
,
1994
, pp.
57
-
64
.
11.
Rahman
,
M.
,
Thomas
,
C.
, and
Zaman
,
M. M.
, “
Field Evaluation of Drainable Bases in Oklahoma
,” ORA Report 125-4299,
School of Civil Engineering and Environmental Science, the University of Oklahoma
, Norman, Oklahoma,
1996
.
12.
Burczyk
,
J. M.
,
Saibati
,
K. K.
,
Sprecher
,
R. A.
, and
Farrar
,
M. J.
, “
Factors Influencing Determination of a Subgrade Resilient Modulus Value
,”
Transportation Research Record
No. 1462,
Washington, DC
,
1994
, pp.
72
-
78
.
13.
Elfino
,
M. K.
and
Davidson
,
J. L.
, “
Modeling Field Moisture in Resilient Moduli Testing
,”
Special Technical Publication on Resilient Moduli of Soils: Laboratory Conditions
,
24
,
ASCE
,
New York
,
1989
.
14.
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
, AASHTO Designation T 294-94, “
Standard Method of Test for Resilient Modulus of Unbound Granular Base/Subbase Materials and Subgrade Soils
,”
AASHTO
,
Washington, DC
,
1994
.
15.
Huang
,
Y. H.
,
Pavement Analysis and Design
,
Prentice Hall
,
Englewood, NJ
,
1993
.
16.
Oklahoma Department of Transportation (ODOT)
, “
Standard Specifications for Highway Construction
,”
Oklahoma City
,
1988
.
17.
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
, AASHTO Designation T 180-93, “
Standard Method of Test for Moisture-Density Relations of Soils Using a 10-lb [4.54 kg] Rammer and an 18-in. [457 mm] Drop
,”
AASHTO
,
Washington, DC
,
1993
.
18.
Harichandran
,
R. S.
,
Yeh
,
M. S.
, and
Baladi
,
G. Y.
, “
MICH-PAVE: A Nonlinear Finite Element Program for Analysis of Flexible Pavements
,” Transportation Research Record, No. 1286,
Transportation Research Board
,
Washington, DC
,
1990
, pp.
123
-
131
.
19.
Asphalt Institute
,
Thickness Design-Asphalt Pavements for Highways and Streets
, Manual Series No. 1 (MS-1),
Lexington, KY
,
09
1981
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.