Abstract
Resilient modulus () of subgrade soil is a key input parameter in all three hierarchical levels of the new mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide (MEPDG). A successful implementation of the MEPDG requires a comprehensive evaluation of database(s) for local subgrade soils and its assessment to determine desired input parameters. To this end, a database containing subgrade values, index properties, standard Proctor, and unconfined compressive strengths for 712 soil samples from 39 different counties in Oklahoma was developed. A total of five stress-based regression models were evaluated using a statistical software package (“SPSS,” Version 17), and material constants (k1, k2, and k3) for these soils, categorized in accordance with the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Classification system, were determined. The goodness of fit and the significance of these models were ranked with respect to their R2 and F values, respectively; the MEPDG recommended octahedral model was found to outperform the others. Furthermore, reasonably good correlations of material constants with routine soil properties were established for Level 2 analysis and design. Typical values of common Oklahoma soils for Level 3 analysis and design were also estimated. The findings of this study are expected to help the implementation of the MEPDG in Oklahoma.
Issue Section:
Research Papers
References
1.
Kim
, S.
, Gopalakrishnan
, K.
, and Ceylan
, H.
, “Iowa’s Rubbilized Pavements: Design Properties of Rubbilized PCC layers
,” 88th TRB 2009 Annual Meeting
(CD-ROM), Washington, DC, January 11–15, 2009
, Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C.2.
NCHRP
, Guide for Mechanistic-Empirical Design of Pavement Structures: Part 2—Design Inputs
,” ARA, Inc, ERES Consultants Div
, Champaign, IL
, 2004
.3.
Titi
, H.
, Elias
, M.
, and Helwany
, S.
, “Determination of Typical Resilient Modulus Values for Selected Soils in Wisconsin
,” Final Report, Wisconsin Highway Research Program, Project ID 0092-03-11, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 2006
.4.
Wang
, K.
, “Database Preparation for MEPDG PrepME,” “Presentation Slides
,” 2009 Southeastern Pavement Preservation Partnership (SEPPP) Conference
, New Orleans, LA, May 13–15, 2009
, Federal Highway Administration
, Washington, DC
.5.
ODOT
, “Development of a Flexible Pavement Database for Local Calibration of the MEPDG
,” Item 2209, State Planning and Research Work Program FFY 2010
, Oklahoma Department of Transportation
, Oklahoma City, OK
, 2010
.6.
George
, K. F.
, “Prediction of Resilient Modulus from Soil Index Properties
,” Technical Report No. FHWA/MS-DOT-RD-04-172, Mississippi Department of Transportation, Research Division, Jackson, MS, 2004
.7.
Hopkins
, T. C.
, Bekham
, T. L.
, Sun
, C.
, and Ni
, B.
, “Resilient Modulus Data for Kentucky Soils
,” Research Report KTC-01-07/SPR-163-95-IF, Kentucky Transportation Center, Frankfort, Kentucky, 2004
.8.
Khazanovich
, L.
, Celaro
, C.
, Chadbourn
, B.
, Zollars
, J.
, and Dai
, S.
, “Evaluation of Subgrade Resilient Modulus Predictive Model for Use in Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide
,” Transp. Res. Rec.
0361-1981, Vol. 1947
, 2006
, pp. 155
–166
. https://doi.org/10.3141/1947-159.
Kim
, D.
and Siddiki
, N. Z.
, Simplification of Resilient Modulus Testing for Subgrades, Publication No.: FHWA/IN/JTRP-2005/23, SPR-2633N
, Indiana Department of Transportation, Division of Research
, West Lafayette, IN
, 2006
.10.
Malla
, R. B.
and Joshi
, S.
, “Subgrade Resilient Modulus Prediction Models for Coarse and Fine-Grained Soils Based on Long-Term Pavement Performance Data
,” Int. J. Pavement Eng.
1029-8436, Vol. 9
, No. 6
, 2008
, pp. 431
–444
. https://doi.org/10.1080/1029843080227983511.
SAS Software,
2011
, Version unknown of the SAS System, SAS Institute Inc. Copyright 2011, SAS and all other SAS Institute Inc. product or service names are registered trademarks or trademarks of SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, USA.12.
Hossain
, S.
, “Estimation of Subgrade Resilient Modulus for Virginia Soil
,” 88th Annual Meeting
(CD-ROM), Washington, DC, January 11–15, 2009
, Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C.13.
Richardson
, D. N.
, Petry
, T. M.
, Ge
, L.
, Han
, Y.
, and Lusher
, S. M.
, Final Technical Report No. OR09-016, Missouri Department of Transportation, Resilient Moduli of Typical Missouri Soils and Unbound Granular Base Materials, Jefferson City, MO, 2009
.14.
Baladi
, G.
, Tyler
, D.
, and Sessions
, C.
, “Pavement Subgrade MR Design Values for Michigan’s Seasonal Changes
,” Technical Report RC-1531, Michigan Department of Transportation, Construction and Technology Division, Lansing, MI 48909, 2009
.15.
Souliman
, M.
, Mamlouk
, M.
, El-Basyouny
, M.
, and Zapata
, C.
“Calibration of The AASHTO MEPDG For Flexible Pavement for Arizona Conditions
,” 89th TRB Annual Meeting
(CD-ROM), Washington, DC, January 10–14, 2010
, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.16.
Ebrahimi
, A.,
2006
, “Regression and Neural Network Modeling of Resilient Modulus Based on Routine Soil Properties and Stress States
,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Oklahoma
, Norman, OK.17.
ODOT
, 2009
, “CD Containing Resilient Modulus Data for ODOT Projects from 2007 to 2009
,” Personal Communication with Christopher Clarke, Materials Engineer, Oklahoma Department of Transportation, Oklahoma City, OK.18.
Burgess,
2009
, “Resilient Modulus Test Data in 2007-2009
,” Personal Contact with Mr. Cheong Fung Ting, Burgess Engineering and Testing, Moore, Oklahoma.19.
Terracon,
2009
, “Resilient Modulus Testing Data According to AASHTO T 307
,” Personal Contact with Dr. Norman K. Tan, Terracon Consulting, Oklahoma City, OK.20.
Norusis
, M. J.
, SPSS 11.0 Guide to Data Analysis
, Chapter 22 on Analyzing Residuals, Prentice Hall
, NJ
, 2002
.21.
Osborne
, J.
and Walters
, E.
, 2002
, “Four Assumptions of Multiple Regression That Researchers Should Always Test
,” J. Pract. Assess. Res. Eval.
, Vol. 8
, No. 2
, 7 p.22.
Moosazadeh
, J.
, and Witczak
, M. W.
, 1981
, “Prediction of Subgrade Moduli for Soil That Exhibits Nonlinear Behavior
,” Transportation Research Record. 810, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., pp. 9
–17
.23.
Dunlap
, W. S.
, “A Report on a Mathematical Model Describing the Deformation Characteristics of Granular Materials
,” Technical Report 1, Project 2-8-62-27, TTI, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 1963
.24.
Andrei
, D.
, Witczak
, M. W.
, Schwartz
, C. W.
, and Uzan
, J.
, 2004
, “Harmonized Resilient Modulus Test 50 Method for Unbound Pavement Materials
,” Transportation Research Record. 1874, Washington, D.C., pp. 29
–37
.25.
Von Quintus
, H. L.
and Killingsworth
, B.
, Analyses Relating to Pavement Material Characterizations and Their Effects on Pavement Performance
,” Publication Number FHWA-RD-97-085, Federal Highway Administration
, Washington, D.C.
, 1997
.26.
Yau
, A.
and Von Quintus
, H. L.
, 2002
, “Study of Laboratory Resilient Modulus Test Data and Response Characteristics, Final Report
,” Final Report, Publication No. FHWA-RD-02–051, Federal Highway Administration, McLean, VA.27.
Solanki
, P.
, Ebrahimi
, A.
, and Zaman
, M.
, “Statistical Models for Determining Resilient Modulus for Subgrade Soils
,” Int. J. Pavement Res. Technol.
, Vol. 1
, No. 3
, 2009
, pp. 85
–93
.28.
Lee
, W.
, Bohra
, N. C.
, Altschaeffl
, A. G.
, and White
, T. D.
, “Resilient Modulus of Cohesive Soils
,” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng.
1090-0241, Vol. 123
, No. 2
, 1977
, pp. 131
–135
. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1997)123:2(131)29.
Jones
, M. P.
and Witczak
, M. W.
, “Subgrade Modulus on the San Diego 1 Test Road
,” Transportation Research Record. 641, TRB, Washington, D.C., 1977
, pp. 1
–6
.30.
Ping
, W. V.
, Zenghai
, Y.
, Chunshui
, L.
, and Bruce
, D.
, “Measuring Resilient Modulus of Granular Materials in Flexible Pavements
,” Transportation Research Record. 1778, Washington, D.C., pp. 81
–90
, 2001
.31.
Taylor
, A. J.
and Timm
, D. H.
, “Mechanistic Characterization of Resilient Moduli for Unbound Pavement Layer Materials
,” NCAT Report 09-06, National Center for Asphalt Technology, Auburn University, AL, October 2009
.
This content is only available via PDF.
All rights reserved. This material may not be reproduced or copied, in whole or in part, in any printed, mechanical, electronic, film, or other distribution and storage media, without the written consent of ASTM International.
You do not currently have access to this content.
