Abstract

To address the issues of time-consuming and inaccurate feature fusion in traditional Internet of Things (IoT) communication big data multi-attribute fusion algorithms, a new algorithm based on the ant colony neural network is proposed. Modeling and feature decomposition processing is carried out on IoT communication big data, communication data information and data attribute characteristics are optimized into different data groups according to a data clustering algorithm, and a rough set calculation method is used to calculate information attribute characteristics. The genetic algorithm is used to improve the ant colony neural network, improve the search ability, extract the multi-attribute characteristics of IoT communication big data, filter the current big data’s characteristic attribute demand through the comparison method, and achieve multi-attribute feature fusion of IoT communication big data through the similarity measurement method. The experimental results show that the fusion error of the IoT communication big data multi-attribute feature fusion algorithm based on the ant colony neural network is small and relatively stable. During the 600 MB data fusion process, the data fusion processing time of the method in this paper is 150 ms, and the average energy consumption ratio is below 2 %, which reflects better IoT communication big data multi-attribute feature fusion performance.

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Keywords:
ant colony neural network, IoT communication big data, multi-attribute features, genetic algorithm

References

1.
Sharma
 
S.
,
Roy
 
S. D.
, and
Kundu
 
S.
, “
Secrecy Outage of a Multi-relay Cooperative Communication Network with Accumulation of Harvesting Energy at Relays
,”
IET Communications
 
13
, no. 
18
(November
2019
):
2986
–
2995
, https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-com.2019.0027
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
2.
Sargolzaei Javan
 
M.
 and
Akbari
 
M. K.
, “
SmartData 4.0: A Formal Description Framework for Big Data
,”
The Journal of Supercomputing
 
75
, no. 
7
(July
2019
):
3585
–
3620
, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-018-2705-y
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
3.
Beamish
 
A.
,
Raynolds
 
M. K.
,
Epstein
 
H.
,
Frost
 
G. V.
,
Macander
 
M. J.
,
Bergstadt
 
H.
,
Bartsch
 
A.
, et al., “
Recent Trends and Remaining Challenges for Optical Remote Sensing of Arctic Tundra Vegetation: A Review and Outlook
,”
Remote Sensing of Environment
 
246
(September
2020
): 111872, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.111872
4.
Li
 
H.-B.
 and
Zhou
 
C.-J.
, “
Multi-attribute Features of Communication Big Data under Cloud Computing Guide Fusion Simulation
,”
Computer Simulation
 
38
, no. 
3
(
2021
):
393
–
396
, 455.
5.
Zhang
 
H.
,
Cheng
 
C.
,
Xu
 
Z.
, and
Li
 
J.
, “
Survey of Data Fusion Based on Deep Learning
,”
Computer Engineering and Applications
 
56
, no. 
24
(December
2020
):
1
–
11
, https://doi.org/10.3778/j.issn.1002-8331.2007-0475
6.
Cohen
 
M. L.
,
Kisala
 
P. A.
,
Boulton
 
A. J.
,
Carlozzi
 
N. E.
,
Cook
 
C. V.
, and
Tulsky
 
D. S.
, “
Development and Psychometric Characteristics of the TBI-QOL Communication Item Bank
,”
The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation
 
34
, no. 
5
(September/October
2019
):
326
–
339
, https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000000528
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
PubMed
 
7.
Ait Ou Kharraz
 
M.
,
Picard
 
D.
,
Serhir
 
M.
,
Lavenu
 
C.
, and
Jensen
 
P.
, “
Measurement Methods of Outdoor Low-Voltage Cable Characteristics for Narrowband Power Line Communication
,”
IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery
 
34
, no. 
5
(October
2019
):
1818
–
1826
, https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRD.2018.2876248
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
8.
García-Villegas
 
J. D. D.
,
García-Martínez
 
A.
,
Arriaga-Jordán
 
C. M.
,
Ruiz-Torres
 
M. E.
,
Rayas-Amor
 
A. A.
,
Dorward
 
P.
, and
Martínez-García
 
C. G.
, “
Use of Information and Communication Technologies in Small-Scale Dairy Production Systems in Central Mexico
,”
Experimental Agriculture
 
56
, no. 
5
(October
2020
):
767
–
779
, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479720000319
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
9.
Abdel-Basset
 
M.
,
Ding
 
W.
, and
El-Shahat
 
D.
, “
A Hybrid Harris Hawks Optimization Algorithm with Simulated Annealing for Feature Selection
,”
Artificial Intelligence Review
 
54
, no. 
1
(January
2021
):
593
–
637
, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-020-09860-3
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
10.
Jurczuk
 
K.
,
Czajkowski
 
M.
, and
Kretowski
 
M.
, “
Multi-GPU Approach to Global Induction of Classification Trees for Large-Scale Data Mining
,”
Applied Intelligence
 
51
, no. 
8
(August
2021
):
5683
–
5700
, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-020-01952-5
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
11.
Chen
 
M.
 and
Zhu
 
D.
, “
Data Collection from Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks Based on Optimization Algorithms
,”
Computing
 
102
, no. 
1
(January
2020
):
83
–
104
, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-019-00731-6
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
12.
Saleh
 
A. I.
,
Elkasas
 
M. S.
, and
Hamza
 
A. A.
, “
Ant Colony Prediction by Using Sectorized Diurnal Mobility Model for Handover Management in PCS Networks
,”
Wireless Networks
 
25
, no. 
2
(February
2019
):
765
–
775
, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-017-1590-2
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
13.
Siraj
 
A.
,
Vaughn
 
R. B.
, and
Bridges
 
S. M.
, “
Decision Making for Network Health Assessment in an Intelligent Intrusion Detection System Architecture
,”
International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making
 
3
, no. 
2
(June
2004
):
281
–
306
, https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622004001057
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
14.
Laskar
 
M. A.
 and
Laskar
 
R. H.
, “
HiLAM-State Discriminative Multi-task Deep Neural Network in Dynamic Time Warping Framework for Text-Dependent Speaker Verification
,”
Speech Communication
 
121
(August
2020
):
29
–
43
, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2020.03.007
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
15.
Zhang
 
Y.
,
Cao
 
K.
,
Liang
 
K.
, and
Zeng
 
Y.
, “
Study on the Evaluation Model of Serialized Civil Aircraft Commonality Index Based on Fuzzy Set Theory
,”
Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems
 
40
, no. 
6
(
2021
):
11539
–
11558
, https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-202749
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
16.
Li
 
R.
,
Wang
 
X.
,
Liu
 
Y.
, and
Zhang
 
S.
, “
Improved Technology Similarity Measurement in the Medical Field Based on Subject-Action-Object Semantic Structure: A Case Study of Alzheimer’s Disease
,”
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
 
70
, no. 
1
(January
2023
):
280
–
293
, https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2020.3047370
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
This content is only available via PDF.
All rights reserved. This material may not be reproduced or copied, in whole or part, in any printed, mechanical, electronic, film, or other distribution and storage media, without the written consent of ASTM International.
You do not currently have access to this content.